LMAO we all know what his defence should have been
25 May 2005, 02:19 PM
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LMAO we all know what his defence should have been
25 May 2005, 03:07 PM
#3
"Ferdinand, who is currently in Africa doing charity work"
Unacceptable. All the charity work he does is clearly going to suffer now that he's banned.
Seriously though, the comments of the judge really got up my nose - what a condescending twit. 
Suresh
Unacceptable. All the charity work he does is clearly going to suffer now that he's banned.
Seriously though, the comments of the judge really got up my nose - what a condescending twit. Suresh
25 May 2005, 03:19 PM
#4
Originally Posted by Suresh
"Ferdinand, who is currently in Africa doing charity work"
Unacceptable. All the charity work he does is clearly going to suffer now that he's banned. Seriously though, the comments of the judge really got up my nose - what a condescending twit.
Suresh
Unacceptable. All the charity work he does is clearly going to suffer now that he's banned.
Seriously though, the comments of the judge really got up my nose - what a condescending twit. Suresh
In fact why hasnt he been banned for longer? What kind of deterrent is a 28day ban
25 May 2005, 05:40 PM
#5
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: South Bucks
Posts: 3,213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The ban sounds about right to me... The fines should be more variable though. I mean, he probably earns £1500 in the time it'd take him to have a slash.
I wonder if ordinary members of Joe Public would be treated the same?
I suppose a lot of it is having a lawyer who knows how to dial up the right scenario in the Magistrates' mind(s).
J.
I wonder if ordinary members of Joe Public would be treated the same?
I suppose a lot of it is having a lawyer who knows how to dial up the right scenario in the Magistrates' mind(s).
J.
25 May 2005, 08:26 PM
#6
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"This court views speeding on local highways most seriously, particularly when the speed is more than 100mph"
Isn't it a shame the Ludlow Magistrates at PC Mark Milton's trial didn't feel the same...
Isn't it a shame the Ludlow Magistrates at PC Mark Milton's trial didn't feel the same...
Last edited by chris's scooby; 25 May 2005 at 09:26 PM. Reason: Spelling
25 May 2005, 08:41 PM
#7
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ecosse
Posts: 1,156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FFS !!!!! 28days and its his fourth ban, one for drink and a previous two for speeding.
I got banned a few years ago for speeding when I was younger, similar speed empty road clean licence at the time and I got a 4 month ban, jumped up w*nker springs to mind
John.
28days and its his fourth ban, one for drink and a previous two for speeding.I got banned a few years ago for speeding when I was younger, similar speed empty road clean licence at the time and I got a 4 month ban, jumped up w*nker springs to mind
John.
Trending Topics
26 May 2005, 03:31 PM
#8
Originally Posted by vindaloo
The ban sounds about right to me... The fines should be more variable though. I mean, he probably earns £1500 in the time it'd take him to have a slash.
26 May 2005, 05:17 PM
#9
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tellins, Home of Super Leagues finest, and where a "split" is not all it seems.
Posts: 5,504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why didnt he just say he was testing the limits of the car? Works for off duty policemen so why not one of the gods of football?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post