Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Bugger, where did i put that Plutonium?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17 February 2005, 08:53 AM
  #2  
brickboy
Scooby Regular
 
brickboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,965
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Don't worry, you only need 4kg of plutonium for a fission device of around 20 kiloton yield
Old 17 February 2005, 08:55 AM
  #3  
David Lock
Scooby Regular
 
David Lock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Weston Super Mare, Somerset.
Posts: 14,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

e-bay?
Old 17 February 2005, 08:56 AM
  #4  
boxst
Scooby Regular
 
boxst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Posts: 11,905
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hello

I did wonder about that. If I mis-place a few pence in my budget I have people all over me so quite how they can get away with mislaying plutonium is beyond me.

As an idea of how much Plutonium is required to make a bomb:

Plutonium would probably be less attractive to terrorists than uranium. Although far smaller quantities of it are necessary to build a bomb, plutonium does not occur naturally and must be synthesized in nuclear reactors. Plutonium is also harder to work with, extremely harmful to humans when inhaled, and tens of thousands of times more radioactive than uranium, presenting a far greater danger to the bomb designers who would have to shape and handle it. The original U.S. plutonium weapon, used on Nagasaki in 1945, used approximately 13 pounds of plutonium, and modern U.S. weapons require less.
From: http://www.terrorismanswers.org/weap...ing_print.html

Steve.
Old 17 February 2005, 09:07 AM
  #5  
ajm
Scooby Regular
 
ajm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Reading between the lines somewhat, I don't think this means they have dropped a 30kg lump of plutonium somewhere "Homer style" . Rather it means that they measure the amounts of plutonium coming into the plant and the depleated waste that comes out of the plant and try and match the two. The way I understand it this is limited in accuracy and the 30kg discrepancy has come about after hundreds of tonnes of throughput and spread across a lengthy period of time, so statistically it is insignificant and, apparently, well within specified limits set by the authorities.

Either that or pslewis nicked it!
Old 17 February 2005, 09:13 AM
  #6  
Belmondo
Scooby Regular
 
Belmondo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

I did wonder about that. If I mis-place a few pence in my budget I have people all over me so quite how they can get away with mislaying plutonium is beyond me.
Me too. I've had to spend whole days looking for sums like 12 Hongkong cents and 4p on accounts that total tens of millions, just because someone thinks it looks untidy if you write it off .
This is just typical of anything the government has any hand in....
Old 17 February 2005, 09:23 AM
  #7  
David Lock
Scooby Regular
 
David Lock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Weston Super Mare, Somerset.
Posts: 14,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Belmondo
Me too. I've had to spend whole days looking for sums like 12 Hongkong cents and 4p on accounts that total tens of millions, just because someone thinks it looks untidy if you write it off .
This is just typical of anything the government has any hand in....

The analogy is your bank melting down several tons of coins and using material to make a new coin. There will be a theoretically "correct" number of new coins minted but the end result is bound to be slightly out because of the process. DL.

On the other hand no one can be CERTAIN that the stuff hasn't gone missing!

Trending Topics

Old 17 February 2005, 11:27 AM
  #8  
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Leslie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Despite the huge tonnage involved, 60 kg of plutonium is a signifcant amount when you consider how many nukes you could produce from it.

It looks like a pretty lackadaisical system they use and bearing in mind the importance attached its about time they got it down to a much more accurate system.

Les
Old 17 February 2005, 11:31 AM
  #9  
Brendan Hughes
Scooby Regular
 
Brendan Hughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: same time, different place
Posts: 11,313
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Presumably we can expect to be invaded by the US any time soon then?
Old 17 February 2005, 11:32 AM
  #10  
ozzy
Scooby Regular
 
ozzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Scotland, UK
Posts: 10,504
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

here we go again, typical media scare mongering. I'm sure the Tony brigade will launch a full enquiry at tax payers expense and we'll then feel nice and safe and vote them in for another term

Every industry that produces industrial waste has descrepencies between what's "physically" accounted for a what the paper chase says should be there.

If it did go "missing" (and it happens every year), just where are all these home-made nuclear bombs????

Are people so paranoid these days that they'll believe any old rubbish?
Old 17 February 2005, 11:46 AM
  #11  
SJ_Skyline
Scooby Senior
 
SJ_Skyline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Limbo
Posts: 21,922
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Red face

Didn't pslewis say in the hunting thread yesterday that he was going to be away for a few days....


edit:


Originally Posted by pslewis
I'm off for a few days now ........

Argue amongst yourselves!

Pete
Old 17 February 2005, 11:58 AM
  #12  
Brendan Hughes
Scooby Regular
 
Brendan Hughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: same time, different place
Posts: 11,313
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

"I'm just going outside - I might be some time..."
Old 17 February 2005, 12:02 PM
  #13  
David Lock
Scooby Regular
 
David Lock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Weston Super Mare, Somerset.
Posts: 14,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Leslie
Despite the huge tonnage involved, 60 kg of plutonium ........Les
Les,
Do you know something we don't? It was 30 kgs last time I looked. Oh well what's a few nukes between friends?
Old 17 February 2005, 06:31 PM
  #14  
hades
Scooby Regular
 
hades's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: From Kent to Gloucestershire to Berkshire
Posts: 2,905
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'd be worried if the only thing preventing plutonium leaving site is the inventory. However, it isn't even nearly the case. The monitoring procedure for anyone or anything going in and out of these sort of buildings will pick up stupidly small amounts of radioactive material. I've worked at power stations and seen major enquiries about invisibly small specs of contaminated steel or graphite, with much smaller total radioactivity than a jar of brazillian coffee. You would not get out carrying a milligram of plutonium without a lot of people knowing about it.

You do have to remember just how tightly regulated the UK nuclear industry is. Aforementioned jar of coffee would have to be packaged and processed as low level waste if it found it's way into certain bits of plant.

Unless anyone actually knows a lot more than is written in the report, we really aren't in a position to determine whether the system or operators need improvement. It wouldn't be the first instance of press sensationalism of something which is no different to any other industry but can grab headlines because of the word "nuclear".
Old 17 February 2005, 06:53 PM
  #15  
Jap2Scrap
Scooby Regular
 
Jap2Scrap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

"nuclear".
<Homer mode>It's pronounced nucular boy, n-u-c-u-l-a-r </Homer mode>
Old 17 February 2005, 07:01 PM
  #16  
Diesel
Scooby Regular
 
Diesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Forget to pay a £60 speeding fine chaps - THAT is considered serious in this country! Plutonium Schplootonium
Old 18 February 2005, 12:29 PM
  #17  
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Leslie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My mistake, I must have been thinking in pounds, like I usually do.

Les
Old 18 February 2005, 12:31 PM
  #18  
Patt@firstime
Scooby Regular
 
Patt@firstime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by David Lock
e-bay?
PMSL
Old 18 February 2005, 04:43 PM
  #19  
Neil Smalley
Scooby Senior
 
Neil Smalley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 8,204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

"I'm sure that in 1985 Plutonium is available from every corner store, but here in 1955 it's a bit more difficult to obtain..."

1.21 Gigawatts!!!
Old 18 February 2005, 04:57 PM
  #20  
SJ_Skyline
Scooby Senior
 
SJ_Skyline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Limbo
Posts: 21,922
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Talking

Originally Posted by Neil Smalley
"I'm sure that in 1985 Plutonium is available from every corner store, but here in 1955 it's a bit more difficult to obtain..."

1.21 Gigawatts!!!
PMSL!!

"You built a time machine out of a DeLorean!?!?"
"I figure if you're gonna build a time machine, do it with style!"

Old 18 February 2005, 05:11 PM
  #21  
16vmarc
Scooby Regular
 
16vmarc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Shell Garage, York
Posts: 10,059
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default



Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frizzle-Dee
Essex Subaru Owners Club
13
09 March 2019 07:35 PM
scoobhunter722
ScoobyNet General
52
20 October 2015 04:32 PM
dpb
Non Scooby Related
14
03 October 2015 10:37 AM
the shreksta
Other Marques
26
01 October 2015 02:30 PM
IAN WR1
ScoobyNet General
8
28 September 2015 08:14 PM



Quick Reply: Bugger, where did i put that Plutonium?



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:20 AM.