Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Galloway wins against Telegraph

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02 December 2004, 12:38 PM
  #1  
Brendan Hughes
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Brendan Hughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: same time, different place
Posts: 11,313
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Galloway wins against Telegraph

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4061165.stm
Old 02 December 2004, 12:46 PM
  #2  
Senior_AP
Scooby Regular
 
Senior_AP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The Telelgraph will be laughing!! £150'000....lol. Pittence.

Galloway is a ****.
Old 02 December 2004, 12:49 PM
  #3  
gsm1
Scooby Regular
 
gsm1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: New Jack City
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The newspaper said it was in the public interest to publish the claims, based on documents found in Baghdad.
What a joke The Telegraph is. They should have been fined a lot more. You must be from stupidsville if you really believe such documents could be so conveniently found in a burning baghdad building.
Old 02 December 2004, 01:14 PM
  #4  
geeva
Scooby Regular
 
geeva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

'Galloway is a ****.'

why is that then ? because he had the cheek to disagree with b-liar and the rest of his zionist warmongering chums ?
Old 02 December 2004, 01:16 PM
  #5  
Senior_AP
Scooby Regular
 
Senior_AP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by geeva
'Galloway is a ****.'

why is that then ? because he had the cheek to disagree with b-liar and the rest of his zionist warmongering chums ?

Cos he publically aligned himself with a mass murdering dictator.

Regarding the case - I don't know, however above is fact. Went to dinner together etc.

Therefore - he's a ****.
Old 02 December 2004, 01:24 PM
  #6  
mattstant
Scooby Regular
 
mattstant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Senior_AP
The Telelgraph will be laughing!! £150'000....lol. Pittence.

Galloway is a ****.
Your forgetting the 1.25 million in costs yet to be awarded hardly a pittance

Yes Galloway has some seriously flawed politics and on the balance probably does more harm than good but the telegraph were more than a little stupid to print unsubstantiated documents of a higly dubious nature.
Old 02 December 2004, 01:25 PM
  #7  
Senior_AP
Scooby Regular
 
Senior_AP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mattstant
Your forgetting the 1.25 million in costs yet to be awarded hardly a pittance

Yes Galloway has some seriously flawed politics and on the balance probably does more harm than good but the telegraph were more than a little stupid to print unsubstantiated documents of a higly dubious nature.

Yes - but that's how the media operates.

Behind closed doors they are laughing - guaranteed.
Old 02 December 2004, 01:44 PM
  #8  
Jye
Scooby Regular
 
Jye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Dumbartonshire
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

Stroll on gorgeous. Yet another win to add to your scalp collection

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article...044031,00.html
Old 02 December 2004, 01:46 PM
  #9  
Senior_AP
Scooby Regular
 
Senior_AP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightbulb

Originally Posted by Jye
Stroll on gorgeous. Yet another win to add to your scalp collection

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article...044031,00.html

Public apologies, agree to settle.

lol - the damage was already done, they got loads of media coverage and sold loads of newspapers!!

PMSL.
Old 02 December 2004, 01:49 PM
  #10  
Jye
Scooby Regular
 
Jye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Dumbartonshire
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Senior_AP
Public apologies, agree to settle.

lol - the damage was already done, they got loads of media coverage and sold loads of newspapers!!

PMSL.
The Christian Science Monitor, yeah I bet they sold shed loads of em
Old 02 December 2004, 01:53 PM
  #11  
Senior_AP
Scooby Regular
 
Senior_AP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jye
The Christian Science Monitor, yeah I bet they sold shed loads of em
You REALLY think they're bothered?? They would have preferred to have won yes. Publically they're all somber and apologetic but behind closed dooors they don't care as they've had massive media publicity over a huge period of time.

The cost?? The money they lost?? To them, relatively nothing.
Old 02 December 2004, 01:54 PM
  #12  
Jye
Scooby Regular
 
Jye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Dumbartonshire
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Stroll on that man

Mr Galloway has now earned an estimated £350,000 in damages from legal actions, some of which have been settled out of court. His most notable success was in 1992, a £150,000 pay-out after the Daily Mirror and Daily Record accused him of abusing his parliamentary privilege by stating that Robert Maxwell, the papers’ former owner, had links with Israeli intelligence.

COURT CRUSADE

GEORGE Galloway’s libel crusade through the courts has proved to be extremely successful.

His first and biggest pay-out came in December 1992, when he successfully sued the Daily Mirror and the Daily Record or £250,000, after they printed editorials accusing him of exploiting and abusing parliamentary privilege and alleging that he had links with an Arab terrorist organisation.

The award included £155,000 in damages, plus costs.

In March 1996, Mr Galloway received an unreserved apology and undisclosed libel damages from the publishers of the London Evening Standard over an article that questioned his financial affairs. The newspaper accepted the article, which appeared under the headline Do tell us how you do it, George, had made allegations which were without foundation.
And btw, he got nearly £100K from the CSM, I guess that's nothing to a man of your means SAP
Old 02 December 2004, 02:01 PM
  #13  
Senior_AP
Scooby Regular
 
Senior_AP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jye
Stroll on that man


And btw, he got nearly £100K from the CSM, I guess that's nothing to a man of your means SAP

Have I ever said Galloway didn't get a shed of cash?????????

'No' I believe is the word you're after.
Old 02 December 2004, 02:05 PM
  #14  
Jye
Scooby Regular
 
Jye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Dumbartonshire
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Never said you didn't, and?
Old 02 December 2004, 02:18 PM
  #15  
Senior_AP
Scooby Regular
 
Senior_AP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jye
Never said you didn't, and?

The link had no relevance to our debate.....

Bizarre.
Old 02 December 2004, 02:22 PM
  #16  
Jye
Scooby Regular
 
Jye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Dumbartonshire
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Our debate? Bizarre.

Last edited by Jye; 02 December 2004 at 02:24 PM.
Old 02 December 2004, 02:28 PM
  #17  
Senior_AP
Scooby Regular
 
Senior_AP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightbulb

Originally Posted by Jye
Our debate? Bizarre.

Yes, Jye. Our debate.
Old 02 December 2004, 02:34 PM
  #18  
Jye
Scooby Regular
 
Jye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Dumbartonshire
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A link posting Galloways 'last' triumph over the press has no relation to his 'latest' triumph over the press?

Bizarre

Debate? You saying he is a ****?

Bizarre
Old 02 December 2004, 02:38 PM
  #19  
Senior_AP
Scooby Regular
 
Senior_AP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jye
A link posting Galloways 'last' triumph over the press has no relation to his 'latest' triumph over the press?

Bizarre

Debate? You saying he is a ****?

Bizarre

I was under the impression our debate ended up being "does the paper actuallly care".
Old 02 December 2004, 02:39 PM
  #20  
paulr
Scooby Regular
 
paulr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 15,623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Senior_AP
Yes - but that's how the media operates.

Behind closed doors they are laughing - guaranteed.
wouldnt think so,doesnt do their reputation much good for seriuos journalism.
Old 02 December 2004, 02:41 PM
  #22  
Jye
Scooby Regular
 
Jye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Dumbartonshire
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Conspicuously or grossly unconventional or unusual.

Bizzare

There was no debate.
Old 02 December 2004, 02:45 PM
  #23  
Jye
Scooby Regular
 
Jye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Dumbartonshire
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ah yes Bob, but the UK and US have shook hands with Saddam more times that you can imagine, Donald Rumsfeld even shook hands with him ffs. And what about Jack Straw and Mugabe, similar thing imo. The thing is Galloway said the war was illegal and it was, the popular press then went to town, yaddayadda.

Now the 'debate' might begin


Old 02 December 2004, 03:05 PM
  #24  
gsm1
Scooby Regular
 
gsm1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: New Jack City
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Not the first time for The Telegraph either. There was a Telegraph reporter in the past who was supplied crap by the intelligence agencies to spread other misinformation.

And I wonder what The Telegraph reported all those years ago when a British journalist was hanged for spying in Iraq? They were probably the first to print the story about how Bazoft had a previous conviction - something the Tory government of the day conveniently leaked to play the whole matter down. But of course we were all great mates back then.
Old 02 December 2004, 03:25 PM
  #25  
Diablo
Scooby Regular
 
Diablo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: £1.785m reasons not to be here :)
Posts: 6,095
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Oi, less use of offensive language please
Old 02 December 2004, 03:30 PM
  #26  
Jye
Scooby Regular
 
Jye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Dumbartonshire
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Diablo
Oi, less use of offensive language please
G****e G******y
Old 02 December 2004, 03:41 PM
  #27  
Diablo
Scooby Regular
 
Diablo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: £1.785m reasons not to be here :)
Posts: 6,095
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

LOL

was referring to the continued use of the banned word Tw*t
Old 02 December 2004, 03:56 PM
  #28  
Senior_AP
Scooby Regular
 
Senior_AP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by paulr
wouldnt think so,doesnt do their reputation much good for seriuos journalism.

They have a first class reputation already. It's a glitch.

This is NOT a tabloid.
Old 02 December 2004, 03:59 PM
  #29  
Senior_AP
Scooby Regular
 
Senior_AP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jye
Ah yes Bob, but the UK and US have shook hands with Saddam more times that you can imagine, Donald Rumsfeld even shook hands with him ffs. And what about Jack Straw and Mugabe, similar thing imo. The thing is Galloway said the war was illegal and it was, the popular press then went to town, yaddayadda.

Now the 'debate' might begin


lol - you dumbass (sorry for that word but it's relevant).

Rumsfeld shook hands for Political reasons. Galloway "liked" SH!!

Ok, if we weren't debating ; it was an argument or a discussion or an exchange of posts. Whatever. Stop being so pedantic.


Last edited by Senior_AP; 02 December 2004 at 04:02 PM.
Old 02 December 2004, 05:02 PM
  #30  
jk100
Scooby Regular
 
jk100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

At least the Telegraph represents the interests of the average Impreza owner...


Quick Reply: Galloway wins against Telegraph



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:27 AM.