Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

No charges for shooting burglar

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26 October 2004, 01:58 PM
  #1  
Brendan Hughes
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Brendan Hughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: same time, different place
Posts: 11,313
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Thumbs up No charges for shooting burglar

As NSR is normally full of rants at the state of, well, life really, here's some news to show you it ain't all bad.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/d...re/3954033.stm
Old 26 October 2004, 02:06 PM
  #2  
De Warrenne
Scooby Regular
 
De Warrenne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

careful mentioning guns - threads suddenly disappear.......
Old 26 October 2004, 02:11 PM
  #3  
boxst
Scooby Regular
 
boxst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Posts: 11,905
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hello

I think it's ridiculous that you cannot protect your own home. I've been working in Atlanta recently where they actually carry handguns (I couldn't believe half of my staff were wearing guns) anyway and they just laughed when I told them that I have absolutely no right to attack a burglar in my house.

This should change, and if anyone enters my house illegally they deserve whatever they get.

Steve.
Old 26 October 2004, 02:13 PM
  #4  
ajm
Scooby Regular
 
ajm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Definately good news! Would-be burglars read it and take note!

(not that I am suggesting any of you would be on the steal! )
Old 26 October 2004, 02:20 PM
  #5  
popeye
Scooby Regular
 
popeye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: cuddly wobbly jelly land
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

Originally Posted by boxst
Hello

I think it's ridiculous that you cannot protect your own home. I've been working in Atlanta recently where they actually carry handguns (I couldn't believe half of my staff were wearing guns) anyway and they just laughed when I told them that I have absolutely no right to attack a burglar in my house.

This should change, and if anyone enters my house illegally they deserve whatever they get.

Steve.
I wonder how many people were killed by handguns in Derbyshire last year, compared to Atlanta?
Old 26 October 2004, 02:24 PM
  #6  
ajm
Scooby Regular
 
ajm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by popeye
I wonder how many people were killed by handguns in Derbyshire last year, compared to Atlanta?
Probably more people shot in Derbyshire than Sweden, what's your point?

p.s. with our unsolved burglary rate we need a good culling. If it were legal to shoot them there would be an inevitable "spike" in gun fatalities. So long as the right people are being shot what's the problem?

Last edited by ajm; 26 October 2004 at 02:26 PM.
Old 26 October 2004, 02:26 PM
  #7  
popeye
Scooby Regular
 
popeye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: cuddly wobbly jelly land
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Originally Posted by ajm
Probably more people shot in Derbyshire than Sweden, what's your point?
Just interested as Atlanta is obviously a crime-free paradise because everyone can own a gun there.
Old 26 October 2004, 02:30 PM
  #8  
Jye
Scooby Regular
 
Jye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Dumbartonshire
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

And probably more people knifed to death in Glasgow in the past six months than people shot in Atlanta in the past year. Obviously where there is a will there is a way
Old 26 October 2004, 02:33 PM
  #9  
boxst
Scooby Regular
 
boxst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Posts: 11,905
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by popeye
Just interested as Atlanta is obviously a crime-free paradise because everyone can own a gun there.
Hello

You are taking me out of context. I do not believe in handguns, and do not like American society at all. Which is why I travel back and forth but live in England.

I am of course talking about the right to defend your home, with a rather blunt rolling pin if that is your preference, which is a must.

Steve.
Old 26 October 2004, 02:38 PM
  #10  
Iwan
Scooby Regular
 
Iwan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Interestingly, saw a program on BBC once where they were interviewing people in Switzerland about national service. Apparently Switzerland has the highest amount of privately owned firearms per head of population of any country, and most of those are assault weapons (AK47's etc).

They also have one of the lowest crime rates, especially gun crime which is apparently very low indeed.
Old 26 October 2004, 02:38 PM
  #11  
popeye
Scooby Regular
 
popeye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: cuddly wobbly jelly land
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Originally Posted by boxst
Hello

You are taking me out of context. I do not believe in handguns, and do not like American society at all. Which is why I travel back and forth but live in England.

I am of course talking about the right to defend your home, with a rather blunt rolling pin if that is your preference, which is a must.

Steve.
Fair enough, but I wouldn't put up with Americans "laughing" on this subject, if they honestly believe the correct way to deal with a burglar is to engage them in a gun battle. I've never understood why shooting someone or getting shot yourself is the best way to deal with that situation.
Old 26 October 2004, 02:41 PM
  #12  
DJ Dunk
Moderator
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (5)
 
DJ Dunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Not all those who wander are lost
Posts: 17,863
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Group buy on Tec9's anyone ?
Old 26 October 2004, 04:05 PM
  #13  
Geezer
Scooby Senior
 
Geezer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: North Wales
Posts: 5,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Top result! I only wish all judges were this sensible. The farmer shold get an award!

I can't helpl feeling there will be a civil case against the farmer by this scumbag for compensation. And he will probably get it.

Geezer
Old 26 October 2004, 04:09 PM
  #14  
Comper100
Scooby Regular
 
Comper100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Somewhere in a Subaru Legacy Turbo
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yep Top result, man the man a hero, and let that be a example to the scum out there, might make them think twice now!

I recon a 40% reduction atleast would be achived if the burgulars new that they wen't on the property at there own risk!

Good on him

Comper100
Old 26 October 2004, 04:19 PM
  #15  
Petem95
Scooby Regular
 
Petem95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Scoobynet
Posts: 5,387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Couldnt believe that outcome - with the Uk's current legal system you'd expect the victim to have to pay 10k compensation to the burglar, and the burglar to be sent on a fully expensed holiday to recover, while the victim is jailed for using a firearm.

No denying its a difficult area however, dont want to end up having people armed. Burglar should have no rights when breaking into someones house.
Old 26 October 2004, 04:19 PM
  #16  
Kieran_Burns
Scooby Regular
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (1)
 
Kieran_Burns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: There on the stair
Posts: 10,208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Those people that consider the applause for such an action an invitation to own guns and "if they honestly believe the correct way to deal with a burglar is to engage them in a gun battle" are mis-understanding the point being made.

If someone attempts to burgle your property they should be considered OUTSIDE THE LAW. This is where the term "Out-Law" comes from.

It is MEANT to be a cornerstone of our legal system, that people who commit crimes place themselves outside of its' protection.

This is a VERY important point to consider. It means if you tackle a burglar in your house you are within YOUR rights to defend that property, and if the OUTLAW is injured then that's their own stupid fault for putting themselves outside the law in the first place.

This does not advocate murdering people when they commit crimes against you or your property, just that you should be able to use reasonable force to defend the same.

THIS IS WHY THE HOUSE CRIME IS SO LOW in the States... burglars KNOW that they can be killed when entering peoples property, and move onto other areas.....
Old 26 October 2004, 04:21 PM
  #17  
Kieran_Burns
Scooby Regular
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (1)
 
Kieran_Burns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: There on the stair
Posts: 10,208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Petem95
Couldnt believe that outcome - with the Uk's current legal system you'd expect the victim to have to pay 10k compensation to the burglar, and the burglar to be sent on a fully expensed holiday to recover, while the victim is jailed for using a firearm.

No denying its a difficult area however, dont want to end up having people armed. Burglar should have no rights when breaking into someones house.
The local paper does state that the police DID intend to prosecute, but under the circumstances chose not to as he did not go armed with intent to wound, just to scare - that and the fact that he was scared for his life justified him carrying the weapon in the first place.
Old 26 October 2004, 04:29 PM
  #18  
GaryK
Scooby Regular
 
GaryK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Bedfordshire
Posts: 4,037
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

extremely well put kieran!
Old 26 October 2004, 04:29 PM
  #19  
De Warrenne
Scooby Regular
 
De Warrenne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

very difficult one this

Tony Martin imprisoned for shooting burglar in back as the burglar was trying to leave

This chap gets off as he shot bloke in leg inside his house and claims it was a 'warning'

My understanding is that reasonable force is determined by the threat to the hgouseholder - any force used as someone is leaving a property is deemed unreasonable.

I suspect a lot more 'warning' shots will be fired in the future
Old 26 October 2004, 04:32 PM
  #20  
Kieran_Burns
Scooby Regular
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (1)
 
Kieran_Burns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: There on the stair
Posts: 10,208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just to clarify - this was the THIRD time the victim had been burgled by the SAME man in a month.

and the burglar was on probation, AND had just been 'let off' another burglary crime!!

(and just to add insult to injury - he, he, he - he asked for another £20,000 worth burgled goods to be taken into account)
Old 26 October 2004, 04:47 PM
  #21  
billythekid
Scooby Regular
 
billythekid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by De Warrenne
careful mentioning guns - threads suddenly disappear.......
See this is what I don’t get. People see guns as a bad thing. The govt did the same thing in 1997 by bringing in the small arms ban. A very bad decision as they now have the problem of rising gun crime in the uk.

I dont see any problem with any place that allows concealed carry of firearms. These places are often the safest and the people who carry the firearms are often much more mentally stable and further more much better trained and informed about their rights and the law.
Old 26 October 2004, 05:18 PM
  #22  
Markus
Scooby Regular
 
Markus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: The Great White North
Posts: 25,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Lets say or gun laws changed, to echo the way they are in the US. Do you think the UK would turn into the same kinda of mess that the US has?

Personally I think not. Part of the reason is the 'fear' put into people in the US by the media. Ok, so mr moore isn't totally accurate, but bowling for columbine does have some interesting points about guns and associated things.

As for the story, excellent result! We should be able to protect our homes and familes. If somone is illegally on my property, I should be able to use whatever force I deem reasonable (and it's MY defitition, not that of the law) to protect my property and family. If that means gunning down some little chav in the back, then so be it, little git should not be there in the first place.
Old 26 October 2004, 05:58 PM
  #23  
tiggers
Scooby Regular
 
tiggers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Lots of different places! (Thank you Mr. Lambert)
Posts: 3,037
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Markus,

Where do you get this idea of the US being in this big mess. I am currently sitting here typing this from Arizona. There is less petty crime here in one of the US's major cities than in many of the UK's provincial towns.

As for the UK having a gun law like the US don't make me laugh. The majority of US citizens have grown up in a gun culture and most have been taught to respect firearms and what they can do. If the laws were changed in the UK the place would erupt on a wave of gun violence the likes of which you can't imagine.

You've only got to look at the levels of violence in a major town in the UK on any Friday or Saturday night to imagine the carnage there would be if half of them had a gun.

tiggers.
Old 26 October 2004, 06:55 PM
  #24  
billythekid
Scooby Regular
 
billythekid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tiggers
You've only got to look at the levels of violence in a major town in the UK on any Friday or Saturday night to imagine the carnage there would be if half of them had a gun.
The US is no different mate. They have brawls in the pub and on the streets in the cities. But guns very rarely come into the equation.

It is highly unlikely that the UK will adopt anything like the same levels of gun control and laws surrounding firearms and the use of. We banned small arms in 1997 and they won’t be coming back. Be that a good or bad thing.

If there is a small change in the law that means you can use pre-emptive force on an intruder then that’s fine by me, but I cant see it to be honest.
Old 26 October 2004, 07:26 PM
  #25  
tiggers
Scooby Regular
 
tiggers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Lots of different places! (Thank you Mr. Lambert)
Posts: 3,037
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by billythekid
The US is no different mate. They have brawls in the pub and on the streets in the cities. But guns very rarely come into the equation.
Sorry, but in my experience they don't. Well not to anywhere near the same extent we do in the UK anyway. Come to that the problem is nowhere near as bad anywhere else in Europe either - the 'go out to get drunk and fight' issue is very much a UK problem IMO.

Originally Posted by billythekid
If there is a small change in the law that means you can use pre-emptive force on an intruder then that’s fine by me, but I cant see it to be honest.
Couldn't agree more, like you say it won't happen though.
Old 27 October 2004, 12:03 AM
  #26  
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Leslie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Good to see a Judge who is prepared to do a bit of real "judging" for once instead of following the PC party line.

Les
Old 27 October 2004, 01:46 AM
  #27  
Lum
Scooby Regular
 
Lum's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: South Wales
Posts: 1,386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So long as any such amendment to the law allows you to defend your car as well as your house.

I wonder if it's worth keeping my granddads old stilson wrench near the bed, the one he used to use to install petrol pumps. I could get all Half Life Opposing Force on the chav with an item that just happened to be lying around
Old 27 October 2004, 08:26 AM
  #28  
Iwan
Scooby Regular
 
Iwan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm not sure if anyones mentioned it yet but the guy did only shoot the burglar with an air rifle didn't he?

If so then that's nowhere near the level of force used by Tony Martin with his shotgun, i think i'd rank an air rifle lower down the scale than a carving knife or a baseball bat. If the bloke had used anything bigger then i don't think he'd have got off with it.
Old 27 October 2004, 09:33 AM
  #29  
popeye
Scooby Regular
 
popeye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: cuddly wobbly jelly land
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Originally Posted by Kieran_Burns
Those people that consider the applause for such an action an invitation to own guns and "if they honestly believe the correct way to deal with a burglar is to engage them in a gun battle" are mis-understanding the point being made.

If someone attempts to burgle your property they should be considered OUTSIDE THE LAW. This is where the term "Out-Law" comes from.

It is MEANT to be a cornerstone of our legal system, that people who commit crimes place themselves outside of its' protection.

This is a VERY important point to consider. It means if you tackle a burglar in your house you are within YOUR rights to defend that property, and if the OUTLAW is injured then that's their own stupid fault for putting themselves outside the law in the first place.

This does not advocate murdering people when they commit crimes against you or your property, just that you should be able to use reasonable force to defend the same.

THIS IS WHY THE HOUSE CRIME IS SO LOW in the States... burglars KNOW that they can be killed when entering peoples property, and move onto other areas.....
What does all this have to do with the point I was making? Of couse you're entitled to have a go at someone breaking into your house, I was merely stating that I don't believe this gun-owning utopia that the handgun-lobbiests are demanding is the right way to go about things.

I tried searching for some stats on this "THIS IS WHY THE HOUSE CRIME IS SO LOW in the States" claim, but couldn't find any. I'm not disputing it, but I'm a little sceptical, so could you point me to where you got this from? Thanks.
Old 27 October 2004, 09:51 AM
  #30  
boxst
Scooby Regular
 
boxst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Posts: 11,905
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hello Popeye

I don't think that people should really have guns. It probably does reduce the number of burglaries, if only by the fact that some of them do get killed and injured so they wont be "going to work" for a while if at all. The not very good statistic is that 1 child a day gains access to their parents' gun and kills themselves (from television adverts I see whilst in America).

I do think that the Police should have guns and that the number of innocent people shot outweighs the advantage of armed Police. One of my favourite Robin Williams jokes: "A Policeman in England sees a burglar running away, so he shouts 'STOP! Or I'm going to shout stop again!'".

Steve.


Quick Reply: No charges for shooting burglar



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:23 AM.