No charges for shooting burglar
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: same time, different place
Posts: 11,313
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
2 Posts
No charges for shooting burglar
As NSR is normally full of rants at the state of, well, life really, here's some news to show you it ain't all bad.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/d...re/3954033.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/d...re/3954033.stm
#3
Hello
I think it's ridiculous that you cannot protect your own home. I've been working in Atlanta recently where they actually carry handguns (I couldn't believe half of my staff were wearing guns) anyway and they just laughed when I told them that I have absolutely no right to attack a burglar in my house.
This should change, and if anyone enters my house illegally they deserve whatever they get.
Steve.
I think it's ridiculous that you cannot protect your own home. I've been working in Atlanta recently where they actually carry handguns (I couldn't believe half of my staff were wearing guns) anyway and they just laughed when I told them that I have absolutely no right to attack a burglar in my house.
This should change, and if anyone enters my house illegally they deserve whatever they get.
Steve.
#5
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: cuddly wobbly jelly land
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by boxst
Hello
I think it's ridiculous that you cannot protect your own home. I've been working in Atlanta recently where they actually carry handguns (I couldn't believe half of my staff were wearing guns) anyway and they just laughed when I told them that I have absolutely no right to attack a burglar in my house.
This should change, and if anyone enters my house illegally they deserve whatever they get.
Steve.
I think it's ridiculous that you cannot protect your own home. I've been working in Atlanta recently where they actually carry handguns (I couldn't believe half of my staff were wearing guns) anyway and they just laughed when I told them that I have absolutely no right to attack a burglar in my house.
This should change, and if anyone enters my house illegally they deserve whatever they get.
Steve.
#6
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by popeye
I wonder how many people were killed by handguns in Derbyshire last year, compared to Atlanta?
p.s. with our unsolved burglary rate we need a good culling. If it were legal to shoot them there would be an inevitable "spike" in gun fatalities. So long as the right people are being shot what's the problem?
Last edited by ajm; 26 October 2004 at 02:26 PM.
#7
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: cuddly wobbly jelly land
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ajm
Probably more people shot in Derbyshire than Sweden, what's your point?
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Dumbartonshire
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And probably more people knifed to death in Glasgow in the past six months than people shot in Atlanta in the past year. Obviously where there is a will there is a way
#9
Originally Posted by popeye
Just interested as Atlanta is obviously a crime-free paradise because everyone can own a gun there.
You are taking me out of context. I do not believe in handguns, and do not like American society at all. Which is why I travel back and forth but live in England.
I am of course talking about the right to defend your home, with a rather blunt rolling pin if that is your preference, which is a must.
Steve.
#10
Interestingly, saw a program on BBC once where they were interviewing people in Switzerland about national service. Apparently Switzerland has the highest amount of privately owned firearms per head of population of any country, and most of those are assault weapons (AK47's etc).
They also have one of the lowest crime rates, especially gun crime which is apparently very low indeed.
They also have one of the lowest crime rates, especially gun crime which is apparently very low indeed.
#11
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: cuddly wobbly jelly land
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by boxst
Hello
You are taking me out of context. I do not believe in handguns, and do not like American society at all. Which is why I travel back and forth but live in England.
I am of course talking about the right to defend your home, with a rather blunt rolling pin if that is your preference, which is a must.
Steve.
You are taking me out of context. I do not believe in handguns, and do not like American society at all. Which is why I travel back and forth but live in England.
I am of course talking about the right to defend your home, with a rather blunt rolling pin if that is your preference, which is a must.
Steve.
#13
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: North Wales
Posts: 5,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Top result! I only wish all judges were this sensible. The farmer shold get an award!
I can't helpl feeling there will be a civil case against the farmer by this scumbag for compensation. And he will probably get it.
Geezer
I can't helpl feeling there will be a civil case against the farmer by this scumbag for compensation. And he will probably get it.
Geezer
#14
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Somewhere in a Subaru Legacy Turbo
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yep Top result, man the man a hero, and let that be a example to the scum out there, might make them think twice now!
I recon a 40% reduction atleast would be achived if the burgulars new that they wen't on the property at there own risk!
Good on him
Comper100
I recon a 40% reduction atleast would be achived if the burgulars new that they wen't on the property at there own risk!
Good on him
Comper100
#15
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Scoobynet
Posts: 5,387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Couldnt believe that outcome - with the Uk's current legal system you'd expect the victim to have to pay 10k compensation to the burglar, and the burglar to be sent on a fully expensed holiday to recover, while the victim is jailed for using a firearm.
No denying its a difficult area however, dont want to end up having people armed. Burglar should have no rights when breaking into someones house.
No denying its a difficult area however, dont want to end up having people armed. Burglar should have no rights when breaking into someones house.
#16
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: There on the stair
Posts: 10,208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Those people that consider the applause for such an action an invitation to own guns and "if they honestly believe the correct way to deal with a burglar is to engage them in a gun battle" are mis-understanding the point being made.
If someone attempts to burgle your property they should be considered OUTSIDE THE LAW. This is where the term "Out-Law" comes from.
It is MEANT to be a cornerstone of our legal system, that people who commit crimes place themselves outside of its' protection.
This is a VERY important point to consider. It means if you tackle a burglar in your house you are within YOUR rights to defend that property, and if the OUTLAW is injured then that's their own stupid fault for putting themselves outside the law in the first place.
This does not advocate murdering people when they commit crimes against you or your property, just that you should be able to use reasonable force to defend the same.
THIS IS WHY THE HOUSE CRIME IS SO LOW in the States... burglars KNOW that they can be killed when entering peoples property, and move onto other areas.....
If someone attempts to burgle your property they should be considered OUTSIDE THE LAW. This is where the term "Out-Law" comes from.
It is MEANT to be a cornerstone of our legal system, that people who commit crimes place themselves outside of its' protection.
This is a VERY important point to consider. It means if you tackle a burglar in your house you are within YOUR rights to defend that property, and if the OUTLAW is injured then that's their own stupid fault for putting themselves outside the law in the first place.
This does not advocate murdering people when they commit crimes against you or your property, just that you should be able to use reasonable force to defend the same.
THIS IS WHY THE HOUSE CRIME IS SO LOW in the States... burglars KNOW that they can be killed when entering peoples property, and move onto other areas.....
#17
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: There on the stair
Posts: 10,208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Petem95
Couldnt believe that outcome - with the Uk's current legal system you'd expect the victim to have to pay 10k compensation to the burglar, and the burglar to be sent on a fully expensed holiday to recover, while the victim is jailed for using a firearm.
No denying its a difficult area however, dont want to end up having people armed. Burglar should have no rights when breaking into someones house.
No denying its a difficult area however, dont want to end up having people armed. Burglar should have no rights when breaking into someones house.
#19
very difficult one this
Tony Martin imprisoned for shooting burglar in back as the burglar was trying to leave
This chap gets off as he shot bloke in leg inside his house and claims it was a 'warning'
My understanding is that reasonable force is determined by the threat to the hgouseholder - any force used as someone is leaving a property is deemed unreasonable.
I suspect a lot more 'warning' shots will be fired in the future
Tony Martin imprisoned for shooting burglar in back as the burglar was trying to leave
This chap gets off as he shot bloke in leg inside his house and claims it was a 'warning'
My understanding is that reasonable force is determined by the threat to the hgouseholder - any force used as someone is leaving a property is deemed unreasonable.
I suspect a lot more 'warning' shots will be fired in the future
#20
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: There on the stair
Posts: 10,208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just to clarify - this was the THIRD time the victim had been burgled by the SAME man in a month.
and the burglar was on probation, AND had just been 'let off' another burglary crime!!
(and just to add insult to injury - he, he, he - he asked for another £20,000 worth burgled goods to be taken into account)
and the burglar was on probation, AND had just been 'let off' another burglary crime!!
(and just to add insult to injury - he, he, he - he asked for another £20,000 worth burgled goods to be taken into account)
#21
Originally Posted by De Warrenne
careful mentioning guns - threads suddenly disappear.......
I dont see any problem with any place that allows concealed carry of firearms. These places are often the safest and the people who carry the firearms are often much more mentally stable and further more much better trained and informed about their rights and the law.
#22
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: The Great White North
Posts: 25,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lets say or gun laws changed, to echo the way they are in the US. Do you think the UK would turn into the same kinda of mess that the US has?
Personally I think not. Part of the reason is the 'fear' put into people in the US by the media. Ok, so mr moore isn't totally accurate, but bowling for columbine does have some interesting points about guns and associated things.
As for the story, excellent result! We should be able to protect our homes and familes. If somone is illegally on my property, I should be able to use whatever force I deem reasonable (and it's MY defitition, not that of the law) to protect my property and family. If that means gunning down some little chav in the back, then so be it, little git should not be there in the first place.
Personally I think not. Part of the reason is the 'fear' put into people in the US by the media. Ok, so mr moore isn't totally accurate, but bowling for columbine does have some interesting points about guns and associated things.
As for the story, excellent result! We should be able to protect our homes and familes. If somone is illegally on my property, I should be able to use whatever force I deem reasonable (and it's MY defitition, not that of the law) to protect my property and family. If that means gunning down some little chav in the back, then so be it, little git should not be there in the first place.
#23
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Lots of different places! (Thank you Mr. Lambert)
Posts: 3,037
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Markus,
Where do you get this idea of the US being in this big mess. I am currently sitting here typing this from Arizona. There is less petty crime here in one of the US's major cities than in many of the UK's provincial towns.
As for the UK having a gun law like the US don't make me laugh. The majority of US citizens have grown up in a gun culture and most have been taught to respect firearms and what they can do. If the laws were changed in the UK the place would erupt on a wave of gun violence the likes of which you can't imagine.
You've only got to look at the levels of violence in a major town in the UK on any Friday or Saturday night to imagine the carnage there would be if half of them had a gun.
tiggers.
Where do you get this idea of the US being in this big mess. I am currently sitting here typing this from Arizona. There is less petty crime here in one of the US's major cities than in many of the UK's provincial towns.
As for the UK having a gun law like the US don't make me laugh. The majority of US citizens have grown up in a gun culture and most have been taught to respect firearms and what they can do. If the laws were changed in the UK the place would erupt on a wave of gun violence the likes of which you can't imagine.
You've only got to look at the levels of violence in a major town in the UK on any Friday or Saturday night to imagine the carnage there would be if half of them had a gun.
tiggers.
#24
Originally Posted by tiggers
You've only got to look at the levels of violence in a major town in the UK on any Friday or Saturday night to imagine the carnage there would be if half of them had a gun.
It is highly unlikely that the UK will adopt anything like the same levels of gun control and laws surrounding firearms and the use of. We banned small arms in 1997 and they won’t be coming back. Be that a good or bad thing.
If there is a small change in the law that means you can use pre-emptive force on an intruder then that’s fine by me, but I cant see it to be honest.
#25
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Lots of different places! (Thank you Mr. Lambert)
Posts: 3,037
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by billythekid
The US is no different mate. They have brawls in the pub and on the streets in the cities. But guns very rarely come into the equation.
Originally Posted by billythekid
If there is a small change in the law that means you can use pre-emptive force on an intruder then that’s fine by me, but I cant see it to be honest.
#27
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2004
Location: South Wales
Posts: 1,386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So long as any such amendment to the law allows you to defend your car as well as your house.
I wonder if it's worth keeping my granddads old stilson wrench near the bed, the one he used to use to install petrol pumps. I could get all Half Life Opposing Force on the chav with an item that just happened to be lying around
I wonder if it's worth keeping my granddads old stilson wrench near the bed, the one he used to use to install petrol pumps. I could get all Half Life Opposing Force on the chav with an item that just happened to be lying around
#28
I'm not sure if anyones mentioned it yet but the guy did only shoot the burglar with an air rifle didn't he?
If so then that's nowhere near the level of force used by Tony Martin with his shotgun, i think i'd rank an air rifle lower down the scale than a carving knife or a baseball bat. If the bloke had used anything bigger then i don't think he'd have got off with it.
If so then that's nowhere near the level of force used by Tony Martin with his shotgun, i think i'd rank an air rifle lower down the scale than a carving knife or a baseball bat. If the bloke had used anything bigger then i don't think he'd have got off with it.
#29
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: cuddly wobbly jelly land
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kieran_Burns
Those people that consider the applause for such an action an invitation to own guns and "if they honestly believe the correct way to deal with a burglar is to engage them in a gun battle" are mis-understanding the point being made.
If someone attempts to burgle your property they should be considered OUTSIDE THE LAW. This is where the term "Out-Law" comes from.
It is MEANT to be a cornerstone of our legal system, that people who commit crimes place themselves outside of its' protection.
This is a VERY important point to consider. It means if you tackle a burglar in your house you are within YOUR rights to defend that property, and if the OUTLAW is injured then that's their own stupid fault for putting themselves outside the law in the first place.
This does not advocate murdering people when they commit crimes against you or your property, just that you should be able to use reasonable force to defend the same.
THIS IS WHY THE HOUSE CRIME IS SO LOW in the States... burglars KNOW that they can be killed when entering peoples property, and move onto other areas.....
If someone attempts to burgle your property they should be considered OUTSIDE THE LAW. This is where the term "Out-Law" comes from.
It is MEANT to be a cornerstone of our legal system, that people who commit crimes place themselves outside of its' protection.
This is a VERY important point to consider. It means if you tackle a burglar in your house you are within YOUR rights to defend that property, and if the OUTLAW is injured then that's their own stupid fault for putting themselves outside the law in the first place.
This does not advocate murdering people when they commit crimes against you or your property, just that you should be able to use reasonable force to defend the same.
THIS IS WHY THE HOUSE CRIME IS SO LOW in the States... burglars KNOW that they can be killed when entering peoples property, and move onto other areas.....
I tried searching for some stats on this "THIS IS WHY THE HOUSE CRIME IS SO LOW in the States" claim, but couldn't find any. I'm not disputing it, but I'm a little sceptical, so could you point me to where you got this from? Thanks.
#30
Hello Popeye
I don't think that people should really have guns. It probably does reduce the number of burglaries, if only by the fact that some of them do get killed and injured so they wont be "going to work" for a while if at all. The not very good statistic is that 1 child a day gains access to their parents' gun and kills themselves (from television adverts I see whilst in America).
I do think that the Police should have guns and that the number of innocent people shot outweighs the advantage of armed Police. One of my favourite Robin Williams jokes: "A Policeman in England sees a burglar running away, so he shouts 'STOP! Or I'm going to shout stop again!'".
Steve.
I don't think that people should really have guns. It probably does reduce the number of burglaries, if only by the fact that some of them do get killed and injured so they wont be "going to work" for a while if at all. The not very good statistic is that 1 child a day gains access to their parents' gun and kills themselves (from television adverts I see whilst in America).
I do think that the Police should have guns and that the number of innocent people shot outweighs the advantage of armed Police. One of my favourite Robin Williams jokes: "A Policeman in England sees a burglar running away, so he shouts 'STOP! Or I'm going to shout stop again!'".
Steve.