Brainteaser/mathmatical question
#1
Scooby Senior
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Next door to the WiFi connection
Posts: 16,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Brainteaser/mathmatical question
its an old 1.... some1 will know the answer and my brain aint up to the job today so hoping scoobynet will work its magic for me...
its the 1 where 3 people chip in £10 each for a room = £30.... guy at the counter realises hes over charged the room was only £25 so send the porter up with £5 who pockets £2 and gives the guys a pound each back. theyve all paid £9 each 9x3=27 and the porter has 2 quid wheres the missing pound?
Ive owrked this out no end of times but not today I really cant be bothered using the head
thanks
its the 1 where 3 people chip in £10 each for a room = £30.... guy at the counter realises hes over charged the room was only £25 so send the porter up with £5 who pockets £2 and gives the guys a pound each back. theyve all paid £9 each 9x3=27 and the porter has 2 quid wheres the missing pound?
Ive owrked this out no end of times but not today I really cant be bothered using the head
thanks
#4
Scooby Senior
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Next door to the WiFi connection
Posts: 16,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Carter, not sure if I understand what your saying although think Ive just worked it out again, if theyve all only paid £9 each then they've only paid £27 in total and £2 of that is in the porters pocket, so the answer is there is no missing pound its just twisted the way its worded with the maths involved, correct?
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Never do names esp. Joey, spaz or Mong
Posts: 39,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The muddle creeps in here because you end up counting the same money more than once, and not counting other money!
Consider the following transaction:
If you were to make the same mistake as in the original problem above, you would say "Bobby has paid two pounds, and Sally has kept two pounds, making a total of four pounds, so where did the other six pounds from the original ten pounds go?"
What if Bobby originally gave Sally twenty pounds, and she again kept only two and gave back eighteen? Would we then be missing sixteen pounds from the original twenty?!
The problem here is that you're counting the same money twice - the two pounds that Bobby paid to Sally is the same money as the two pounds that Sally has. Adding these two values together doesn't tell you anything meaningful. If you add up the actual moneys held at the end of the transaction - the two pounds that Sally keeps and the eight pounds that Bobby gets back - you get ten pounds, as expected.
Now, in your problem there were thirty pounds in cash originally received by the hotel. At the end of the transaction, the total amount of cash in the "system" (25 + 2 + 1 + 1 + 1) still adds up to thirty, so there is no missing pound. In other words, all the different chunks of money add up to the original total of thirty pounds.
The fallacious missing pound creeps in when you start adding up the same money more than once.
In the story, it says that "each employee paid 9 pounds each for their room, costing them 27 pounds in total. Together with the 2 pounds that their porter has kept that makes a total of 29 pounds."
However, the two pounds that the porter has kept is part of the 27 pounds the employees have paid - it is not different money, so it can't be added to the employees' 27 pounds. You're counting it twice, just like with Bobby and Sally.
The fact that this meaningless value adds up to one less than thirty, which causes the "missing pound", is pure coincidence. If the employees had overpaid by fifteen pounds rather than five, and their boss had still kept two pounds, then by this argument you would now have eleven missing pounds:
Consider the following transaction:
- Bobby gives Sally ten pounds.
- Sally gives Bobby back eight pounds.
If you were to make the same mistake as in the original problem above, you would say "Bobby has paid two pounds, and Sally has kept two pounds, making a total of four pounds, so where did the other six pounds from the original ten pounds go?"
What if Bobby originally gave Sally twenty pounds, and she again kept only two and gave back eighteen? Would we then be missing sixteen pounds from the original twenty?!
The problem here is that you're counting the same money twice - the two pounds that Bobby paid to Sally is the same money as the two pounds that Sally has. Adding these two values together doesn't tell you anything meaningful. If you add up the actual moneys held at the end of the transaction - the two pounds that Sally keeps and the eight pounds that Bobby gets back - you get ten pounds, as expected.
Now, in your problem there were thirty pounds in cash originally received by the hotel. At the end of the transaction, the total amount of cash in the "system" (25 + 2 + 1 + 1 + 1) still adds up to thirty, so there is no missing pound. In other words, all the different chunks of money add up to the original total of thirty pounds.
The fallacious missing pound creeps in when you start adding up the same money more than once.
In the story, it says that "each employee paid 9 pounds each for their room, costing them 27 pounds in total. Together with the 2 pounds that their porter has kept that makes a total of 29 pounds."
However, the two pounds that the porter has kept is part of the 27 pounds the employees have paid - it is not different money, so it can't be added to the employees' 27 pounds. You're counting it twice, just like with Bobby and Sally.
The fact that this meaningless value adds up to one less than thirty, which causes the "missing pound", is pure coincidence. If the employees had overpaid by fifteen pounds rather than five, and their boss had still kept two pounds, then by this argument you would now have eleven missing pounds:
- Employees pay 40 pounds
- Shopkeeper gives boss 15 pounds back
- Boss keeps 2 pounds, gives employees 13
- Net result: Employees have paid 27 pounds, boss keeps 2, sum 29.
- Where's the other 11?
Last edited by lightning101; 13 October 2004 at 12:59 PM.
#9
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Midlands - between notts and derby !
Posts: 4,997
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They had £30
They have paid £27
The b&b has £25 and the porter has £2
Its not £9 x 3 = £27 + £2 = £29
the £2 is already used in the 3 x £9.
It should be the £27 + the £3 ie £25 room, £2 porter and £3 change
Dave.
They have paid £27
The b&b has £25 and the porter has £2
Its not £9 x 3 = £27 + £2 = £29
the £2 is already used in the 3 x £9.
It should be the £27 + the £3 ie £25 room, £2 porter and £3 change
Dave.
#10
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sunny Dorset
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's all in the wording
If the room cost £25, then this would have cost £8.33 each, so the porter should have given them £1.66 each, as it is he only gave them £1 so he stole 66/7p of each of them. This equates to his £2.
Mike
If the room cost £25, then this would have cost £8.33 each, so the porter should have given them £1.66 each, as it is he only gave them £1 so he stole 66/7p of each of them. This equates to his £2.
Mike
#11
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Swilling coffee at my lab bench
Posts: 9,096
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
theyve all paid £9 each 9x3=27 and the porter has 2 quid wheres the missing pound?
They've paid £9 each, total £27, which equates to £25 for the room plus the £2 stolen by the porter.
Or, to look at it another way, the original £30 goes as £25 for the room, £2 for the porter and £3 refunded.
The problem is just in the assertion that for some reason the £2 should be added to the £27. This is nonsense - the £2 has already been included in the £27.
#13
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Warrington
Posts: 4,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Alternatively
3 people chip in £10 each for a room = £30.... guy at the counter realises hes over charged the room was only £25 so send the porter up with £5 who pockets £3 and gives the guys 66p each back. theyve all paid £9.33 each 9.33x3=28 and the porter has 3 quid, generating a pound from thin air Keep doing this and you'll soon be a rich man
Last edited by speedking; 13 October 2004 at 01:44 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Brzoza
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
1
02 October 2015 05:26 PM