OK, So I asked Stephen Hawking this and never gotta reply so it's does anyone know?..
#1
OK, So I asked Stephen Hawking this and never gotta reply so it's does anyone know?..
Go with me on this....
You're driving through space at lightspeed in you car. (yes it's theoretical)
You switch your headlights on
Do you see the light from them?
You're driving through space at lightspeed in you car. (yes it's theoretical)
You switch your headlights on
Do you see the light from them?
#2
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Holder of six fairy tokens, from the land of green ginger
Posts: 1,420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by papascooby
Go with me on this....
You're driving through space at lightspeed in you car. (yes it's theoretical)
You switch your headlights on
Do you see the light from them?
You're driving through space at lightspeed in you car. (yes it's theoretical)
You switch your headlights on
Do you see the light from them?
#5
You can't move at lightspeed as your car becomes infinitely heavy and you therefore require infinite amounts of energy as you approach C. Hawking didn't answer 'cos it's a stupid question
Cman
Cman
#6
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: God's promised land
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by papascooby
You're driving through space at lightspeed in you car. (yes it's theoretical)
#7
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Never do names esp. Joey, spaz or Mong
Posts: 39,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Holder of six fairy tokens, from the land of green ginger
Posts: 1,420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Old_Fart
You can't move at lightspeed as your car becomes infinitely heavy and you therefore require infinite amounts of energy as you approach C. Hawking didn't answer 'cos it's a stupid question
Cman
Cman
#9
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Lots of different places! (Thank you Mr. Lambert)
Posts: 3,037
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by papascooby
You're driving through space at lightspeed in you car.
#11
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Scotchland
Posts: 6,566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes you would - the light from your lights is travelling at the speed of light away from you - So you would see just the same as if you were stationary. Tail-lights / rear fogs becomes a little tricky in your rear view mirror
#12
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Never do names esp. Joey, spaz or Mong
Posts: 39,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In Newtonian physics, time is a constant. Time is experienced by all people at the same rate. Also forces are propogated instantly. Gravitational effects are felt instantly at all points in the universe. Einsteins special theory of relativity had shown that cannot be true. Nothing can break the light speed barrier, due to the infinite energy and the time for object at lightspeed being zero, so greater than light speed would mean negative time! This contradicts Newton, so Einstein needed a new view of gravity. This he brought out in 1915, and it was called the general theory of relativity.
Newton described gravity as a force. Einstein described it as a form of geometry. To picture this, imagine a rubber sheet stretched out and suspended. That is the universe without any objects, and so without gravity.
If a ball is dropped onto the sheet, a depression is made, and that is what gravity is, a warping of the geometry of space. When light from a distant star is observed passing another star, it looks like it is bent by gravity. The fact is it is going in a straight line through Einsteins geometry, and it is only from our viewpoint does it look bent
Newton described gravity as a force. Einstein described it as a form of geometry. To picture this, imagine a rubber sheet stretched out and suspended. That is the universe without any objects, and so without gravity.
If a ball is dropped onto the sheet, a depression is made, and that is what gravity is, a warping of the geometry of space. When light from a distant star is observed passing another star, it looks like it is bent by gravity. The fact is it is going in a straight line through Einsteins geometry, and it is only from our viewpoint does it look bent
#14
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Scotchland
Posts: 6,566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by lightning101
In Newtonian physics, time is a constant. Time is experienced by all people at the same rate. Also forces are propogated instantly. Gravitational effects are felt instantly at all points in the universe. Einsteins special theory of relativity had shown that cannot be true. Nothing can break the light speed barrier, due to the infinite energy and the time for object at lightspeed being zero, so greater than light speed would mean negative time! This contradicts Newton, so Einstein needed a new view of gravity. This he brought out in 1915, and it was called the general theory of relativity.
Newton described gravity as a force. Einstein described it as a form of geometry. To picture this, imagine a rubber sheet stretched out and suspended. That is the universe without any objects, and so without gravity.
If a ball is dropped onto the sheet, a depression is made, and that is what gravity is, a warping of the geometry of space. When light from a distant star is observed passing another star, it looks like it is bent by gravity. The fact is it is going in a straight line through Einsteins geometry, and it is only from our viewpoint does it look bent
Newton described gravity as a force. Einstein described it as a form of geometry. To picture this, imagine a rubber sheet stretched out and suspended. That is the universe without any objects, and so without gravity.
If a ball is dropped onto the sheet, a depression is made, and that is what gravity is, a warping of the geometry of space. When light from a distant star is observed passing another star, it looks like it is bent by gravity. The fact is it is going in a straight line through Einsteins geometry, and it is only from our viewpoint does it look bent
#16
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: North Wales
Posts: 5,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jasey
Yes you would - the light from your lights is travelling at the speed of light away from you - So you would see just the same as if you were stationary. Tail-lights / rear fogs becomes a little tricky in your rear view mirror
No, light speed is finite, no matter how fast the object emitting it is moving. It's a pointless question, you cannot travel at the speed of light. It's like what would happen if an irresistable force met an immovable object? It just cannot be.
Geezer
#22
Mass appears to increase as you approach the speed of light so if you have any mass at all you cannot reach it, if you have no mass eg a photon then you can reach the speed of light. Courtesy of Einstein’s theory of special relativity
#23
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Never do names esp. Joey, spaz or Mong
Posts: 39,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
(AP) -- Scientists have apparently broken the universe's speed limit.
For generations, physicists believed there is nothing faster than light moving through a vacuum -- a speed of 186,000 miles per second.
But in an experiment in Princeton, New Jersey, physicists sent a pulse of laser light through cesium vapor so quickly that it left the chamber before it had even finished entering.
The pulse traveled 310 times the distance it would have covered if the chamber had contained a vacuum.
Researchers say it is the most convincing demonstration yet that the speed of light -- supposedly an ironclad rule of nature -- can be pushed beyond known boundaries, at least under certain laboratory circumstances.
For generations, physicists believed there is nothing faster than light moving through a vacuum -- a speed of 186,000 miles per second.
But in an experiment in Princeton, New Jersey, physicists sent a pulse of laser light through cesium vapor so quickly that it left the chamber before it had even finished entering.
The pulse traveled 310 times the distance it would have covered if the chamber had contained a vacuum.
Researchers say it is the most convincing demonstration yet that the speed of light -- supposedly an ironclad rule of nature -- can be pushed beyond known boundaries, at least under certain laboratory circumstances.
#24
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: North Wales
Posts: 5,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by suprabeast
light particles travel at the speed of light though dont they??
Geezer
#25
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Never do names esp. Joey, spaz or Mong
Posts: 39,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
According to the special theory of relativity, the speed of particles of light in a vacuum, such as outer space, is the only absolute measurement in the universe. The speed of everything else -- rockets or inchworms -- is relative to the observer, Einstein and others explained
#26
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Scotchland
Posts: 6,566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by lightning101
But in an experiment in Princeton, New Jersey, physicists sent a pulse of laser light through cesium vapor so quickly that it left the chamber before it had even finished entering.
#28
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Class record holder at Pembrey Llandow Goodwood MIRA Hethel Blyton Curborough Lydden and Snetterton
Posts: 8,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by lightning101
Stephen Hawking would of just said eeeeennnnnnggggghhhhh
"since the car is travelling at the speed of light, and the light emitted from the headlight is travelling at the speed of light, their speed relative to each other (assuming the car is travelling in the same direction as the headlight beam) is zero, hence the light emitted would just sit in the bulb and never escape. Nurse could you change my bag please?"
or something like that
#29
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Never do names esp. Joey, spaz or Mong
Posts: 39,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes, anthing that is not a complete vacuum would affect lightspeed.
Even space is not a complete vaccuum, but it is closest thing we can perceive
Even space is not a complete vaccuum, but it is closest thing we can perceive