Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Long words

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16 August 2004, 11:43 AM
  #1  
Senior_AP
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Senior_AP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Long words

Ever had an argument on this site?? Have you ever noticed that when people get all defensive and panic cos they feel they are losing the argument they resort to using long, unnecessary words to make them self sound clever thus correct??

I've noticed it a few times.

It is inexorably funny.....

Last edited by Senior_AP; 16 August 2004 at 11:56 AM.
Old 16 August 2004, 11:45 AM
  #2  
Faire D'Income
Scooby Regular
 
Faire D'Income's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Surrey
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It's even funnier when they can't spell the aforementioned word.
Old 16 August 2004, 11:47 AM
  #3  
Senior_AP
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Senior_AP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Faire D'Income
It's even funnier when they can't spell the aforementioned word.
Paste the word inexerably into google. It is correct.
Old 16 August 2004, 11:47 AM
  #4  
Brendan Hughes
Scooby Regular
 
Brendan Hughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: same time, different place
Posts: 11,313
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

...or write "them self" instead of "themselves"...
Old 16 August 2004, 11:48 AM
  #5  
ProperCharlie
Scooby Regular
 
ProperCharlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London
Posts: 4,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

can't say i've noticed it myself

maybe i am the exception that proves the ontological rule.

Old 16 August 2004, 11:51 AM
  #6  
ProperCharlie
Scooby Regular
 
ProperCharlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London
Posts: 4,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i would favour the conventional spelling:

inexorably.

i think the context of use is incorrect in any case.
Old 16 August 2004, 11:51 AM
  #7  
Senior_AP
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Senior_AP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Brendan Hughes
...or write "them self" instead of "themselves"...

Prime example. SN is not an English lesson is it. You knew what I meant.

Anyway, I've noticed it....and it is funny. Someone else must have?
Old 16 August 2004, 11:52 AM
  #8  
Senior_AP
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Senior_AP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

Originally Posted by ProperCharlie
i would favour the conventional spelling:

inexorably.

i think the context of use is incorrect in any case.

I put that and google had a go at me, said I was fick!!

It said "do you mean inexerably". I accepted my error and accepted google as right.

Last edited by Senior_AP; 16 August 2004 at 11:54 AM.
Old 16 August 2004, 11:54 AM
  #9  
Faire D'Income
Scooby Regular
 
Faire D'Income's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Surrey
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Senior_AP
Paste the word inexerably into google. It is correct.
As Brendan said. Unless you're American you would spell it this way:

inexorably.
Old 16 August 2004, 11:55 AM
  #10  
Senior_AP
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Senior_AP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Faire D'Income
As Brendan said. Unless you're American you would spell it this way:

inexorably.
See my first post edited......
Old 16 August 2004, 11:57 AM
  #11  
TelBoy
Scooby Regular
 
TelBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: God's promised land
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

pneumonoultramicroscopicilicovolcanoconiosis, ffs.



Old 16 August 2004, 11:58 AM
  #12  
Faire D'Income
Scooby Regular
 
Faire D'Income's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Surrey
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Senior_AP
See my first post edited......
Irrelevant. It's still out of context.
Old 16 August 2004, 11:58 AM
  #13  
Senior_AP
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Senior_AP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TelBoy
pneumonoultramicroscopicilicovolcanoconiosis, ffs.




I've seen similar.

"You're wrong senior, I think you'll find that pneumonoultramicroscopicilicovolcanoconiosis is the term to which you inexOrably refer".

Cracks me up.
Old 16 August 2004, 12:00 PM
  #14  
Brendan Hughes
Scooby Regular
 
Brendan Hughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: same time, different place
Posts: 11,313
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Must be something to do with the declining standards in this country.
Old 16 August 2004, 12:03 PM
  #15  
the moose
Scooby Regular
 
the moose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What, those inexorably declining standards? Blair's fault, I'd say, though perhaps we need a poll of 30 people to prove it.
Old 16 August 2004, 12:03 PM
  #16  
Faire D'Income
Scooby Regular
 
Faire D'Income's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Surrey
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Brendan Hughes
Must be something to do with the declining standards in this country.
Which? The spelling or using long words?
Old 16 August 2004, 12:04 PM
  #17  
shamrock
Scooby Regular
 
shamrock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I find it supercalafragalisticexpialadocious when people enter a discussion just so they can disagree and then try to put over some qualification they've got to back themselves up.

BTW all you're spellings are incorrect, I should know because I came 2nd in a Weetabix spelling competetion when I was 7.
Old 16 August 2004, 12:05 PM
  #18  
the moose
Scooby Regular
 
the moose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by shamrock

BTW all you're spellings are incorrect, I should know because I came 2nd in a Weetabix spelling competetion when I was 7.
PMSL
Old 16 August 2004, 12:05 PM
  #19  
Senior_AP
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Senior_AP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by the moose
What, those inexorably declining standards? Blair's fault, I'd say, though perhaps we need a poll of 30 people to prove it.
Or 70.

92% agree. Maybe they are all wrong and you are right??
Old 16 August 2004, 12:07 PM
  #20  
davegtt
Scooby Senior
 
davegtt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Next door to the WiFi connection
Posts: 16,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

aii noticed it a few times, certain people use words that the average person would probably have to look up to understand where they was coming from. probably to make themselves look better
Old 16 August 2004, 12:07 PM
  #21  
imlach
Scooby Regular
 
imlach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Posts: 5,786
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Another common grammatical mistake....

"I should of done it"

NO NO NO!

It is :

"I should have done it"

Common error comes from people writing it as they think it sounds....must be a term for that, but don't know what it is.
Old 16 August 2004, 12:08 PM
  #22  
lightning101
Scooby Regular
 
lightning101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Never do names esp. Joey, spaz or Mong
Posts: 39,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My god, the antidisestablishmentarianism are out in there droves today.
Old 16 August 2004, 12:09 PM
  #23  
TelBoy
Scooby Regular
 
TelBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: God's promised land
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I never knowingly use a long word when a short one is commensurate.
Old 16 August 2004, 12:09 PM
  #24  
Senior_AP
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Senior_AP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by davegtt
aii noticed it a few times, certain people use words that the average person would probably have to look up to understand where they was coming from. probably to make themselves look better

Cheers. I had noticed it but it seems more and more common recently.
Old 16 August 2004, 12:10 PM
  #25  
the moose
Scooby Regular
 
the moose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Senior_AP
Or 70.

92% agree. Maybe they are all wrong and you are right??
Silly old me. I didn't realise that 70 people was a statistically significant sample, given a registered user goup of approximately 40,000. But then I'm just an old duffer who doesn't understand this sort of stuff.

I'll be off to find some long words then .......
Old 16 August 2004, 12:12 PM
  #26  
imlach
Scooby Regular
 
imlach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Posts: 5,786
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Shame - if it wasn't for the Olympics, I'm sure Call My Muff is usually on BBC2 about now.
Old 16 August 2004, 12:12 PM
  #27  
Senior_AP
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Senior_AP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by the moose
Silly old me. I didn't realise that 70 people was a statistically significant sample, given a registered user goup of approximately 40,000. But then I'm just an old duffer who doesn't understand this sort of stuff.

I'll be off to find some long words then .......

I'd say 92% of 72 people on a poll gives a fair indication of what a general feeling is.

Good luck with finding the words.
Old 16 August 2004, 12:13 PM
  #28  
Senior_AP
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Senior_AP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by imlach
Another common grammatical mistake....

"I should of done it"

NO NO NO!

It is :

"I should have done it"

Common error comes from people writing it as they think it sounds....must be a term for that, but don't know what it is.
That was the fault of that talking bloke on the Amiga 500 software called "Workbench" !!!


hel low my naym iz c nee or a.p.


Old 16 August 2004, 12:15 PM
  #29  
lightning101
Scooby Regular
 
lightning101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Never do names esp. Joey, spaz or Mong
Posts: 39,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

How do you fit this into a scoobynet thread


(1,185) ACETYL­SERYL­TYROSYL­SERYL­ISO­LEUCYL­THREONYL­SER YL­PROLYL­SERYL­GLUTAMINYL­PHENYL­ALANYL­VALYL­PHE NYL­ALANYL­LEUCYL­SERYL­SERYL­VALYL­TRYPTOPHYL­ALA NYL­ASPARTYL­PROLYL­ISOLEUCYL­GLUTAMYL­LEUCYL­LEUC YL­ASPARAGINYL­VALYL­CYSTEINYL­THREONYL­SERYL­SERY L­LEUCYL­GLYCYL­ASPARAGINYL­GLUTAMINYL­PHENYL­ALAN YL­GLUTAMINYL­THREONYL­GLUTAMINYL­GLUTAMINYL­ALANY L­ARGINYL­THREONYL­THREONYL­GLUTAMINYL­VALYL­GLUTA MINYL­GLUTAMINYL­PHENYL­ALANYL­SERYL­GLUTAMINYL­VA LYL­TRYPTOPHYL­LYSYL­PROLYL­PHENYL­ALANYL­PROLYL­G LUTAMINYL­SERYL­THREONYL­VALYL­ARGINYL­PHENYL­ALAN YL­PROLYL­GLYCYL­ASPARTYL­VALYL­TYROSYL­LYSYL­VALY L­TYROSYL­ARGINYL­TYROSYL­ASPARAGINYL­ALANYL­VALYL ­LEUCYL­ASPARTYL­PROLYL­LEUCYL­ISOLEUCYL­THREONYL­ ALANYL­LEUCYL­LEUCYL­GLYCYL­THREONYL­PHENYL­ALANYL ­ASPARTYL­THREONYL­ARGINYL­ASPARAGINYL­ARGINYL­ISO LEUCYL­ISOLEUCYL­GLUTAMYL­VALYL­GLUTAMYL­ASPARAGIN YL­GLUTAMINYL­GLUTAMINYL­SERYL­PROLYL­THREONYL­THR EONYL­ALANYL­GLUTAMYL­THREONYL­LEUCYL­ASPARTYL­ALA NYL­THREONYL­ARGINYL­ARGINYL­VALYL­ASPARTYL­ASPART YL­ALANYL­THREONYL­VALYL­ALANYL­ISOLEUCYL­ARGINYL­ SERYL­ALANYL­ASPARAGINYL­ISOLEUCYL­ASPARAGINYL­LEU CYL­VALYL­ASPARAGINYL­GLUTAMYL­LEUCYL­VALYL­ARGINY L­GLYCYL­THREONYL­GLYCYL­LEUCYL­TYROSYL­ASPARAGINY L­GLUTAMINYL­ASPARAGINYL­THREONYL­PHENYL­ALANYL­GL UTAMYL­SERYL­METHIONYL­SERYL­GLYCYL­LEUCYL­VALYL­T RYPTOPHYL­THREONYL­SERYL­ALANYL­PROLYL­ALANYL­SERI NE = Tobacco Mosaic Virus, Dahlemense Strain.
This word has appeared in the American Chemical Society's Chemical Abstracts and is thus considered by some to be the longest real word.
Old 16 August 2004, 12:17 PM
  #30  
shamrock
Scooby Regular
 
shamrock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thank god for spelling and grammer cheque tools or I'd make loads of mistakes.


Quick Reply: Long words



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:57 PM.