ScoobyNet.com - Subaru Enthusiast Forum

ScoobyNet.com - Subaru Enthusiast Forum (https://www.scoobynet.com/)
-   Non Scooby Related (https://www.scoobynet.com/non-scooby-related-4/)
-   -   Long words (https://www.scoobynet.com/non-scooby-related-4/353574-long-words.html)

Senior_AP 16 August 2004 11:43 AM

Long words
 
Ever had an argument on this site?? Have you ever noticed that when people get all defensive and panic cos they feel they are losing the argument they resort to using long, unnecessary words to make them self sound clever thus correct??

I've noticed it a few times.

It is inexorably funny.....

Faire D'Income 16 August 2004 11:45 AM

It's even funnier when they can't spell the aforementioned word.

Senior_AP 16 August 2004 11:47 AM


Originally Posted by Faire D'Income
It's even funnier when they can't spell the aforementioned word.

Paste the word inexerably into google. It is correct.

Brendan Hughes 16 August 2004 11:47 AM

...or write "them self" instead of "themselves"...

ProperCharlie 16 August 2004 11:48 AM

can't say i've noticed it myself :p

maybe i am the exception that proves the ontological rule.

:)

ProperCharlie 16 August 2004 11:51 AM

i would favour the conventional spelling:

inexorably.

i think the context of use is incorrect in any case. :)

Senior_AP 16 August 2004 11:51 AM


Originally Posted by Brendan Hughes
...or write "them self" instead of "themselves"...


Prime example. SN is not an English lesson is it. You knew what I meant.

Anyway, I've noticed it....and it is funny. Someone else must have?

Senior_AP 16 August 2004 11:52 AM


Originally Posted by ProperCharlie
i would favour the conventional spelling:

inexorably.

i think the context of use is incorrect in any case. :)


I put that and google had a go at me, said I was fick!!

It said "do you mean inexerably". I accepted my error and accepted google as right.

Faire D'Income 16 August 2004 11:54 AM


Originally Posted by Senior_AP
Paste the word inexerably into google. It is correct.

As Brendan said. Unless you're American you would spell it this way:

inexorably.

Senior_AP 16 August 2004 11:55 AM


Originally Posted by Faire D'Income
As Brendan said. Unless you're American you would spell it this way:

inexorably.

See my first post edited......

TelBoy 16 August 2004 11:57 AM

pneumonoultramicroscopicilicovolcanoconiosis, ffs. :mad:



:D

Faire D'Income 16 August 2004 11:58 AM


Originally Posted by Senior_AP
See my first post edited......

Irrelevant. It's still out of context.

Senior_AP 16 August 2004 11:58 AM


Originally Posted by TelBoy
pneumonoultramicroscopicilicovolcanoconiosis, ffs. :mad:



:D


I've seen similar.

"You're wrong senior, I think you'll find that pneumonoultramicroscopicilicovolcanoconiosis is the term to which you inexOrably refer".

Cracks me up.

Brendan Hughes 16 August 2004 12:00 PM

Must be something to do with the declining standards in this country.

the moose 16 August 2004 12:03 PM

What, those inexorably declining standards? Blair's fault, I'd say, though perhaps we need a poll of 30 people to prove it.

Faire D'Income 16 August 2004 12:03 PM


Originally Posted by Brendan Hughes
Must be something to do with the declining standards in this country.

Which? The spelling or using long words?

shamrock 16 August 2004 12:04 PM

I find it supercalafragalisticexpialadocious when people enter a discussion just so they can disagree and then try to put over some qualification they've got to back themselves up.

BTW all you're spellings are incorrect, I should know because I came 2nd in a Weetabix spelling competetion when I was 7. ;)

the moose 16 August 2004 12:05 PM


Originally Posted by shamrock

BTW all you're spellings are incorrect, I should know because I came 2nd in a Weetabix spelling competetion when I was 7. ;)

PMSL

Senior_AP 16 August 2004 12:05 PM


Originally Posted by the moose
What, those inexorably declining standards? Blair's fault, I'd say, though perhaps we need a poll of 30 people to prove it.

Or 70.

92% agree. Maybe they are all wrong and you are right??

davegtt 16 August 2004 12:07 PM

aii noticed it a few times, certain people use words that the average person would probably have to look up to understand where they was coming from. probably to make themselves look better :rolleyes:

imlach 16 August 2004 12:07 PM

Another common grammatical mistake....

"I should of done it"

NO NO NO!

It is :

"I should have done it"

Common error comes from people writing it as they think it sounds....must be a term for that, but don't know what it is.

lightning101 16 August 2004 12:08 PM

My god, the antidisestablishmentarianism are out in there droves today.

TelBoy 16 August 2004 12:09 PM

I never knowingly use a long word when a short one is commensurate. :)

Senior_AP 16 August 2004 12:09 PM


Originally Posted by davegtt
aii noticed it a few times, certain people use words that the average person would probably have to look up to understand where they was coming from. probably to make themselves look better :rolleyes:


Cheers. I had noticed it but it seems more and more common recently.

the moose 16 August 2004 12:10 PM


Originally Posted by Senior_AP
Or 70.

92% agree. Maybe they are all wrong and you are right??

Silly old me. I didn't realise that 70 people was a statistically significant sample, given a registered user goup of approximately 40,000. But then I'm just an old duffer who doesn't understand this sort of stuff.

I'll be off to find some long words then .......

imlach 16 August 2004 12:12 PM

Shame - if it wasn't for the Olympics, I'm sure Call My Muff is usually on BBC2 about now.

Senior_AP 16 August 2004 12:12 PM


Originally Posted by the moose
Silly old me. I didn't realise that 70 people was a statistically significant sample, given a registered user goup of approximately 40,000. But then I'm just an old duffer who doesn't understand this sort of stuff.

I'll be off to find some long words then .......


I'd say 92% of 72 people on a poll gives a fair indication of what a general feeling is.

Good luck with finding the words.

Senior_AP 16 August 2004 12:13 PM


Originally Posted by imlach
Another common grammatical mistake....

"I should of done it"

NO NO NO!

It is :

"I should have done it"

Common error comes from people writing it as they think it sounds....must be a term for that, but don't know what it is.

That was the fault of that talking bloke on the Amiga 500 software called "Workbench" !!!


hel low my naym iz c nee or a.p.


:D

lightning101 16 August 2004 12:15 PM

How do you fit this into a scoobynet thread


(1,185) ACETYL­SERYL­TYROSYL­SERYL­ISO­LEUCYL­THREONYL­SER YL­PROLYL­SERYL­GLUTAMINYL­PHENYL­ALANYL­VALYL­PHE NYL­ALANYL­LEUCYL­SERYL­SERYL­VALYL­TRYPTOPHYL­ALA NYL­ASPARTYL­PROLYL­ISOLEUCYL­GLUTAMYL­LEUCYL­LEUC YL­ASPARAGINYL­VALYL­CYSTEINYL­THREONYL­SERYL­SERY L­LEUCYL­GLYCYL­ASPARAGINYL­GLUTAMINYL­PHENYL­ALAN YL­GLUTAMINYL­THREONYL­GLUTAMINYL­GLUTAMINYL­ALANY L­ARGINYL­THREONYL­THREONYL­GLUTAMINYL­VALYL­GLUTA MINYL­GLUTAMINYL­PHENYL­ALANYL­SERYL­GLUTAMINYL­VA LYL­TRYPTOPHYL­LYSYL­PROLYL­PHENYL­ALANYL­PROLYL­G LUTAMINYL­SERYL­THREONYL­VALYL­ARGINYL­PHENYL­ALAN YL­PROLYL­GLYCYL­ASPARTYL­VALYL­TYROSYL­LYSYL­VALY L­TYROSYL­ARGINYL­TYROSYL­ASPARAGINYL­ALANYL­VALYL ­LEUCYL­ASPARTYL­PROLYL­LEUCYL­ISOLEUCYL­THREONYL­ ALANYL­LEUCYL­LEUCYL­GLYCYL­THREONYL­PHENYL­ALANYL ­ASPARTYL­THREONYL­ARGINYL­ASPARAGINYL­ARGINYL­ISO LEUCYL­ISOLEUCYL­GLUTAMYL­VALYL­GLUTAMYL­ASPARAGIN YL­GLUTAMINYL­GLUTAMINYL­SERYL­PROLYL­THREONYL­THR EONYL­ALANYL­GLUTAMYL­THREONYL­LEUCYL­ASPARTYL­ALA NYL­THREONYL­ARGINYL­ARGINYL­VALYL­ASPARTYL­ASPART YL­ALANYL­THREONYL­VALYL­ALANYL­ISOLEUCYL­ARGINYL­ SERYL­ALANYL­ASPARAGINYL­ISOLEUCYL­ASPARAGINYL­LEU CYL­VALYL­ASPARAGINYL­GLUTAMYL­LEUCYL­VALYL­ARGINY L­GLYCYL­THREONYL­GLYCYL­LEUCYL­TYROSYL­ASPARAGINY L­GLUTAMINYL­ASPARAGINYL­THREONYL­PHENYL­ALANYL­GL UTAMYL­SERYL­METHIONYL­SERYL­GLYCYL­LEUCYL­VALYL­T RYPTOPHYL­THREONYL­SERYL­ALANYL­PROLYL­ALANYL­SERI NE = Tobacco Mosaic Virus, Dahlemense Strain.
This word has appeared in the American Chemical Society's Chemical Abstracts and is thus considered by some to be the longest real word.

shamrock 16 August 2004 12:17 PM

Thank god for spelling and grammer cheque tools or I'd make loads of mistakes.:)


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:30 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands