Well Done, Canada!
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Co Durham
Posts: 1,659
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well Done, Canada!
So the canadians are in the midst of slaughtering 300,000 harp seals to preserve fish stocks!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3618901.stm
Well, here's a thought - how about not over-fishing the seas in the first instance. About time that the fishing industry and governments took responsibility for our ever-dwindling fish stocks and not resort to the carnage that we are seeing at present!
As for fur coming back into fashion - what's the justification?? Arrggh! Perhaps, public skinning of a fashion designer is called for!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3618901.stm
Well, here's a thought - how about not over-fishing the seas in the first instance. About time that the fishing industry and governments took responsibility for our ever-dwindling fish stocks and not resort to the carnage that we are seeing at present!
As for fur coming back into fashion - what's the justification?? Arrggh! Perhaps, public skinning of a fashion designer is called for!
#3
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Kingston ( Surrey, not Jamaica )
Posts: 4,670
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
not condoning it in any way, but I thought that it was interesting that it was the spanish and portugese factory ships that had in a large part decimated the cod stocks.
Steve
Steve
#4
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Harsh as it may seem, if they don't cull them the seals will end up starving to death anyway when the fish stocks deplete. Even if we fished less the seal numbers would continue to grow until curtailed by food shortage.
#6
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Even if we fished less the seal numbers would continue to grow until curtailed by food shortage.
#7
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by OllyK
TaaDaa...nature and natural selection at work!!! So why do we feel the need to interfere? Coz we are greedy and want more than our fair share of the fish!
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
we harvest all the fish we can (just like the seals or any other animal would) until we are curtailed, and I'm sure nature has something in store for us, but thats another discussion...
Yes we will be curtailed, when all the fish runs out, then we will move on to something else, and something else until there is nothing left.
#9
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Founder of surreyscoobies.co.uk
Posts: 2,889
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by drumsterphil
So the canadians are in the midst of slaughtering 300,000 harp seals to preserve fish stocks!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3618901.stm
Well, here's a thought - how about not over-fishing the seas in the first instance. About time that the fishing industry and governments took responsibility for our ever-dwindling fish stocks and not resort to the carnage that we are seeing at present!
As for fur coming back into fashion - what's the justification?? Arrggh! Perhaps, public skinning of a fashion designer is called for!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3618901.stm
Well, here's a thought - how about not over-fishing the seas in the first instance. About time that the fishing industry and governments took responsibility for our ever-dwindling fish stocks and not resort to the carnage that we are seeing at present!
As for fur coming back into fashion - what's the justification?? Arrggh! Perhaps, public skinning of a fashion designer is called for!
#11
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Founder of surreyscoobies.co.uk
Posts: 2,889
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by drumsterphil
Upset? - no, just embarrassed!
How about a national 'Club A Canadian' day??
How about a national 'Club A Canadian' day??
#13
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Some country and western
Posts: 13,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by j4mou
im not a green peace fanatic or owt, but how cute are them little fellas! sick *****!
It wasn't long ago that humans had to interfere with nature due to foot and mouth, but then, cows and sheep are a bit minging aren't they
#14
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Co Durham
Posts: 1,659
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by davyboy
Unfortunately, we can't choose to keep animals could they look all cuddley!
It wasn't long ago that humans had to interfere with nature due to foot and mouth, but then, cows and sheep are a bit minging aren't they
It wasn't long ago that humans had to interfere with nature due to foot and mouth, but then, cows and sheep are a bit minging aren't they
#17
Can't we just slaughter the human fish eaters.
I don't eat fish and have tried to encourage others not to eat cod, but to choose an alternative fish.
So with all the seal culls, will there be 'cheaper' fur coats?
This topic makes me really angry. Why don't those with power look for alternatives and pay that little extra. More 'fish farms' perhaps.
I don't eat fish and have tried to encourage others not to eat cod, but to choose an alternative fish.
So with all the seal culls, will there be 'cheaper' fur coats?
This topic makes me really angry. Why don't those with power look for alternatives and pay that little extra. More 'fish farms' perhaps.
#18
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Co Durham
Posts: 1,659
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Nicci
Can't we just slaughter the human fish eaters.
I don't eat fish and have tried to encourage others not to eat cod, but to choose an alternative fish.
So with all the seal culls, will there be 'cheaper' fur coats?
This topic makes me really angry. Why don't those with power look for alternatives and pay that little extra. More 'fish farms' perhaps.
I don't eat fish and have tried to encourage others not to eat cod, but to choose an alternative fish.
So with all the seal culls, will there be 'cheaper' fur coats?
This topic makes me really angry. Why don't those with power look for alternatives and pay that little extra. More 'fish farms' perhaps.
FYI - over 100 million sharks are killed each year for a number of reasons, finning, sports etc Not very wise to be destroying the natural balance of the oceans just because mankind can't cap it's greed.
#19
All the sharks getting killed...
Lots of other creatures disappearing in the driftnets too. I don't want to get started on the ignorant Tuna eaters.
Why can't people adapt their tastes?
I think magazines etc should use their influence to encourage the fish eaters to try something new.
Lots of other creatures disappearing in the driftnets too. I don't want to get started on the ignorant Tuna eaters.
Why can't people adapt their tastes?
I think magazines etc should use their influence to encourage the fish eaters to try something new.
#20
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hmmm - but how much of the fish we catch is wasted? Thrown back as it is too small etc?? How much do the seals waste? Don't see them sitting on stock piles of fish on the beach do you?
Originally Posted by drumsterphil
IIRC - Birdseye were marketing a fish called Haki as a great substitute for Cod - thats great until we fish all the Haki stock as well!
FYI - over 100 million sharks are killed each year for a number of reasons, finning, sports etc Not very wise to be destroying the natural balance of the oceans just because mankind can't cap it's greed.
FYI - over 100 million sharks are killed each year for a number of reasons, finning, sports etc Not very wise to be destroying the natural balance of the oceans just because mankind can't cap it's greed.
We shouldn't feel guilty for affecting population levels of species so long as it is done sustainably as that is our function as a top predator. Predators affect the levels of their prey, until such a time the availability of prey affects the levels of the predator. If its sustainable the cycle will go on indefinately with neither predator or prey becoming extinct.
Sustainability is the key.
The most realistic answer is not to make people starve, or to cull humans (although this would be effective if only it were allowed ) but to create sustainable fishing by leaving areas "fallow", creation of artificial reefs and breeding grounds, fry release programmes and strict adherance and rigid enforcement of the rules.
#21
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Talk to the hand....
Posts: 13,331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's a disgrace. The 'fish stocks' argument is apparently bogus. The truth is they see it as a 'tradition' and 'a way of life' At least they shoot them now instead of clubbing them to death in front of the mother. It's disgusting.
UB
UB
#22
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: A.K.A RAIDEN, Watford & Tidworth. V7 STI Type RA Spec C, V2 STI,97JDM WRX, Daytona 675R
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i was a bit rude appologies
Last edited by wrxtankie; 13 April 2004 at 09:18 PM. Reason: i was a little out of order
#24
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Co Durham
Posts: 1,659
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Eh?
What is it with people shouting racism? Where is the racism in any part of this thread?
Unclebuck - if only they were all shot - seems like there's a fair amount of clubbing being done - and the sealers think it's a humane way of killing the creatures!
What is it with people shouting racism? Where is the racism in any part of this thread?
Unclebuck - if only they were all shot - seems like there's a fair amount of clubbing being done - and the sealers think it's a humane way of killing the creatures!
#25
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: A.K.A RAIDEN, Watford & Tidworth. V7 STI Type RA Spec C, V2 STI,97JDM WRX, Daytona 675R
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
erm clubbing some canadians,
dont u think peeps would be offended if you said clubbing some pakistani´s
I know its not to do with this thread but you could have been a little more subtle,
At least stating it was meant in light fun,
dont u think peeps would be offended if you said clubbing some pakistani´s
I know its not to do with this thread but you could have been a little more subtle,
At least stating it was meant in light fun,
#26
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Co Durham
Posts: 1,659
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, suggest you could have phrased it like that rather than calling us a bunch of ******!
Still not racism, nationalistic perhaps, but not racist!
Suggest you read the thread properly. There's potentially a number of interesting discussions to be had about this subject and I'm sure than 99% of readers would have seen the underlying humour in 'Club a Canadian' but I guess not all
Still not racism, nationalistic perhaps, but not racist!
Suggest you read the thread properly. There's potentially a number of interesting discussions to be had about this subject and I'm sure than 99% of readers would have seen the underlying humour in 'Club a Canadian' but I guess not all
#27
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: A.K.A RAIDEN, Watford & Tidworth. V7 STI Type RA Spec C, V2 STI,97JDM WRX, Daytona 675R
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just making a point. I thought id use some colourfull language so i could get a fast reply
Last edited by wrxtankie; 13 April 2004 at 09:20 PM. Reason: still sorry
#28
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Co Durham
Posts: 1,659
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by wrxtankie
I think my missus was probably the one pc then m8
Just making a point. I thought id use some colourfull language so i could get a fast reply
Just making a point. I thought id use some colourfull language so i could get a fast reply
#29
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by unclebuck
It's a disgrace. The 'fish stocks' argument is apparently bogus. The truth is they see it as a 'tradition' and 'a way of life' At least they shoot them now instead of clubbing them to death in front of the mother. It's disgusting.
UB
UB
What people seem to forget is that humans are animals as well. We play our part in the natural order of things and it is arrogant to set us aside from the rest and assume that we must make no footprint on nature, as if we were aliens studying another world... look but don't touch. Our input is needed.
The seals have been hunted since prehistoric time and the hunting is embedded in the natural cycle - removing the hunting upsets the cycle just as much as OVER hunting, which is the real issue.
Sustainable hunting, however cruel it may seem to you, is part of the natural order of life. The Canadians say what they are doing IS sustainable - do you have any facts to disprove that? It's their country, and I think its fair to say that they some experience in hunting, over hunting and the effects it has from their past mistakes. Is it not feasible that they may actually have got the level right this time?
Last edited by ajm; 13 April 2004 at 08:43 PM.
#30
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Co Durham
Posts: 1,659
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sorry, don't see much hunting going on - hunting implies sport to me; not very sporting when your prey can't get away or isn't old enough to realise what a threat is.
Just because something is a tradition does not give it the right to be carried on regardless of a changing world. It used to traditon to bait bears for example but it doesn't happen now. Why?, because the world has changed.
The bottom line to me appears to be that mankind has over-fished the oceans to the point of crisis and yet appears to be doing very little constructively to sort the problem other than go on a bloody slaughter.
I agree that sustainable hunting is a necessity on occasions butnot at the expense of tackling the under-lying route of the problem.
Just because something is a tradition does not give it the right to be carried on regardless of a changing world. It used to traditon to bait bears for example but it doesn't happen now. Why?, because the world has changed.
The bottom line to me appears to be that mankind has over-fished the oceans to the point of crisis and yet appears to be doing very little constructively to sort the problem other than go on a bloody slaughter.
I agree that sustainable hunting is a necessity on occasions butnot at the expense of tackling the under-lying route of the problem.