speeding fines to possibly go up by £5..
#1
just listening to the news on radio 1 , it says the government is looking to increase speeding fines by £5 to raise cash for the fight against crime.
Wonderful news ...
brett
Wonderful news ...
brett
Trending Topics
#9
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 4,496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So if everybody kept under the speed limits for 6 months or so, does that mean this government / country / police force would be shafted because they have no money? If that is indeed true then it is a sad fcuked up state of affairs
#10
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: A powerslide near you
Posts: 10,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So the message being sent out is...
to fund the ongoing fight against crime, we need more people to commit a crime to fund the fight.
That's what I called joined up government thinking
to fund the ongoing fight against crime, we need more people to commit a crime to fund the fight.
That's what I called joined up government thinking
#11
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I thought the money was going to a victims of crime fund?
Anyway yet again the motorist will foot the bill.
Why - because it is easy to extract money from the motorist rather than a druggie with no fixed abode.
Scumbags commit the crimes like robbery or rape and the motorist pays their way for them - This sucks but then again it a new labour way of doing things.
Victims should be compensated, no argument but by the perpertator(s) of the crimes.
Another example of this governments inability to fix the problem.
Also Labour are thinking about an extra tax on alcohol to go into a fund for the crimes commited by drunkards - yet again the responsibility is taken away from the criminal and put elsewhere.
With this logic then the extra money for speeding should come from the car manufacturers or retailers as they sold a car capable of breaking the law.
What a farce
New Labour - MY ****!
[Edited by Paul Habgood - 1/12/2004 5:34:03 PM]
Anyway yet again the motorist will foot the bill.
Why - because it is easy to extract money from the motorist rather than a druggie with no fixed abode.
Scumbags commit the crimes like robbery or rape and the motorist pays their way for them - This sucks but then again it a new labour way of doing things.
Victims should be compensated, no argument but by the perpertator(s) of the crimes.
Another example of this governments inability to fix the problem.
Also Labour are thinking about an extra tax on alcohol to go into a fund for the crimes commited by drunkards - yet again the responsibility is taken away from the criminal and put elsewhere.
With this logic then the extra money for speeding should come from the car manufacturers or retailers as they sold a car capable of breaking the law.
What a farce
New Labour - MY ****!
[Edited by Paul Habgood - 1/12/2004 5:34:03 PM]
#12
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Kent, England
Posts: 619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I almost got a free toaster with the points I had a few years ago!
Outrageous that the government can even consider this in light of how much they are currently robbing from the average motorist.
Outrageous that the government can even consider this in light of how much they are currently robbing from the average motorist.
#13
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Talk to the hand....
Posts: 13,331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This new proposal is just sickening.[img]images/smilies/mad.gif[/img] God, I loathe this Politically Correct government. They are just so feckin' cynical.[img]images/smilies/mad.gif[/img]
Gotta vote them out asap. Or, I must the hell out of this ruined country.
UB[img]images/smilies/mad.gif[/img]
Gotta vote them out asap. Or, I must the hell out of this ruined country.
UB[img]images/smilies/mad.gif[/img]
#18
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2000
Location: MY00,MY01,RX-8, Alfa 147 & Focus ST :-)
Posts: 10,371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Some forces do offer you the choice of paying £95 (and no points) if you attend a 'speed awareness course' - only 6 or 7 forces currently doing it though.
Instead of increasing the fine, why not direct £5 from the £60 they already get? Afterall, surely these cameras haven't been used to purely generate revenue? Have they? Therefore it would seem right to redirect some of the money.
Chris (with his tongue firmly in his cheek )
Instead of increasing the fine, why not direct £5 from the £60 they already get? Afterall, surely these cameras haven't been used to purely generate revenue? Have they? Therefore it would seem right to redirect some of the money.
Chris (with his tongue firmly in his cheek )
#19
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: God's promised land
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ah, but Chris, this is a "surcharge", not a fine.
BIG difference, apparently!
The Home Office Minister on Newsnight last night was hopeless, in my opinion. Won't be marking her down for a glittering Ministerial career...
BIG difference, apparently!
The Home Office Minister on Newsnight last night was hopeless, in my opinion. Won't be marking her down for a glittering Ministerial career...
#20
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: http://www.facebook.com
Posts: 15,233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'd rather not get caught speeding in the 1st place
Even insurance companies now only increase premiums minimally for 3 points because it's the norm now. If they didn't they'd be un competitive.
Mikey
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post