Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

one for the mathematicians

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15 December 2003, 07:05 PM
  #1  
scooby stu!!
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
scooby stu!!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

if the following drawings are sections through two tubes
I need a formula to work out the value of Y if we know the value of
X. to make the second tube the same mass as the first

hope it makes sense

Stu
Old 15 December 2003, 07:26 PM
  #2  
hades
Scooby Regular
 
hades's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: From Kent to Gloucestershire to Berkshire
Posts: 2,905
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Need to know the wall thickness too, if you want a precise answer.
Old 15 December 2003, 07:30 PM
  #3  
scooby stu!!
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
scooby stu!!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

will know the wall thickness we will call that Z

cheers

Stu
Old 15 December 2003, 07:39 PM
  #4  
ajm
Scooby Regular
 
ajm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Is the overall length the same between the two?

If the wall thickness is also the same in both then the mass can never be the same for a fixed length because there is more material in the second tube.
Old 15 December 2003, 07:43 PM
  #5  
AndyC_772
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
AndyC_772's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Swilling coffee at my lab bench
Posts: 9,096
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

No there isn't - the second tube has a smaller diameter, so for a given wall thickness, there's less material in it.
Old 15 December 2003, 07:43 PM
  #6  
scooby stu!!
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
scooby stu!!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

The length is the same. The smaller dia in the middle of the second tube gives up matierial as there is less in a smaller dia
than a bigger dia.

stu
Old 15 December 2003, 07:45 PM
  #7  
ajm
Scooby Regular
 
ajm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

doh! good point!
Old 15 December 2003, 08:11 PM
  #8  
AndyC_772
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
AndyC_772's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Swilling coffee at my lab bench
Posts: 9,096
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

I've had a quick go at this, and it's not a simple problem. I end up with an awfully long quadratic equation that doesn't look as though it's going to simplify much. Here it is:

L(R^2-(R-z)^2)=Y((R-x)^2-(R-z-x)^2)+2z(R^2-(R-z-x)^2)+(L-Y-2z)(R^2-(R-z)^2)

where L is the overall length of the tube and z is the wall thickness.

Expanding this out gives: LR^2-L(R^2-2zr+z^2)=Y(R^2-2xR+x^2-(R^2wib-ble-barF^Ine-eee-ed.a+beeR^4....

Where's this problem come from, anyway?
Old 15 December 2003, 08:22 PM
  #9  
ajm
Scooby Regular
 
ajm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

ha ha!

I have an expression (after a page of algebra) that:-

a) I can't be arsed to simplify
b) Is probably grotesquely wrong anyway!

L(t²-2rt)=(L-Y-2t)(t²-2rt)+2t(r²-(r-t-x)²)+Y((r-x)²-(r-x-t)²)

where t is the tude thickness

had too much wine to think about this any further! If it is really important to you it can probably be solved iteratively with a program (sorry maths geeks! )

[Edited by ajm - 12/15/2003 8:24:23 PM]
Old 15 December 2003, 09:07 PM
  #10  
mj
Scooby Regular
 
mj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The poliotical wing of Chip Sengravy.
Posts: 6,129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post





...it can't be done from only one dimension "X"... you need V,W,Z.

what are you trying to work out - in layman's terms ?.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
astraboy
Non Scooby Related
16
05 November 2009 10:21 PM



Quick Reply: one for the mathematicians



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:25 PM.