TurboKitty

When have I ever had anything to say on the topic of who is, or who is not a "social out cast" or a "propper dead beat", or where such people might shop?

I am curious to know why anyone would think I would care about Kilroy, especially since, as I have now pointed out, I don't watch television.

IMO locking a thread before you know whether is going to be negative or not, is jumping the gun somewhat. Are you going to lock all my threads now just in case some antagonistic idiot happens to comment and I happen to react?

And don't tell me I should be mailing you about this, because I am at work and can't.

dsmith

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

TurboKitty

dsmith, tell me you're bored when you've had a thread locked within seconds and without a single reply, just on the basis of what people *might* say on it.

Til then, this thread was for the attention of Diablo, not you, so don't poke your nose in.

mj

can anybody smell pre-menstrual tension in the air?

cue luke..................

krankyd

The thread about drug abuse was locked when people started recounting their `not really that bad` experiances..

TurboKitty

A thread about drug abuse and a thread with a reasonable question about why someone would expect me to comment on the Kilroy guests, are a tad different, no?

Apart from anything else, Kilroy is not illegal, as far as I am aware.

krankyd

mabey because these sort of discussions are like **** on a scooby wheel.

keeps coming around again, and again, till someone scrapes it off

ps. Drug abuse is NOT illegal. Drug possessions is, although. :P

[Edited by krankyd - 3/13/2003 1:41:23 PM]

TurboKitty

Seriously, if threads are going to be locked on the basis of what might be said, the mods should just lock all the threads now.

krankyd

RTM!

lock this thread then!

that'll serve you right

Diablo

TK,

I am not suggesting for one moment that you would have anything to comment one way or the other.

I locked the thread because you had made you point and it was not going anywhere. Its not a case of what might or might not have been said.

NSR is not a forum for personal "issues" between posters.

Witness this thread, already it has degenerated

Please people, and that applies to anyone "involved" keep it in muppets.

Thanks

D

[Edited by diablo - 3/13/2003 1:45:16 PM]

RaZe-=Buzz=-

if you are going to turn up in all of them arguing with everyone about everything, then they might as well..

I suppose you are going to argue with me that you dont argue with everyone now, or are you going to argue that you wont argue about arguing??



PS Keep up the good work, sometime there are two sides to the arguement and I know you can be trusted to ensure they will be aired. I agree with you about thread locking, but I tend to believe the moderators have a reason.

TurboKitty

I'd have FAO'd him in muppets if there was any chance he'd have seen it in there.

I accept the point that I'd said what I have to say though.

TurboKitty

Buzz,

I asked a question. Where was I arguing??

Because I have been know to argue in the past, and could possibly be called argumentative, I can't say anything without it being an argument?

My whole point here is that I won't argue about anything. I have no interest whatsoever in the subject of the Kilroy thread. I haven't seen the programme. I don't have an opinion. I am not getting involved. Where's the argument?

image doctor

Kilroy rocks, whoooo hoooooo!!!!!!

Don't ever diss the man.

TurboKitty

Anyway, I've accepted Diablo's point and I have nothing more to add here, so you'll have to carry on without me.

Diablo

Well if he isn't he probably should be

Can I lock this one now please

D

image doctor

ohh one more post before it does.

Diablo

OK