SQL and ports query
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Bore Knee Muff
Posts: 3,666
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ah, the wonders of the Scoobynet IT community...
Todays question is:
If a machine is running SQLserver 2000 what would cause a certain port to be unaccessible.
We are sure it 'used' to work and there are no rules in the Firewall stopping it.
Where should I look to find what is blocking this port.
Is it possible that something else is using the same port? We have recently installed some software called NowPlanner. Is there any easy way to find out if that software is using that port?
Any help gratefully received, I'm just a simply Mac user who knows nothing about windoze etc.
Rich.
Todays question is:
If a machine is running SQLserver 2000 what would cause a certain port to be unaccessible.
We are sure it 'used' to work and there are no rules in the Firewall stopping it.
Where should I look to find what is blocking this port.
Is it possible that something else is using the same port? We have recently installed some software called NowPlanner. Is there any easy way to find out if that software is using that port?
Any help gratefully received, I'm just a simply Mac user who knows nothing about windoze etc.
Rich.
#2
Is the port on the server actually active ???
Run netstat -n on the server to see if it is...
If it is you "could" run a port scan against the bix to see if the service/app that is using it responds in some way.. That might give you a clue
Run netstat -n on the server to see if it is...
If it is you "could" run a port scan against the bix to see if the service/app that is using it responds in some way.. That might give you a clue
#4
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Hi,
Most firewalls need to be configured to permit traffic in both directions... be sure that you are open in both directions.
What port is it that is conflicting??
David
Most firewalls need to be configured to permit traffic in both directions... be sure that you are open in both directions.
What port is it that is conflicting??
David
#6
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Posts: 3,105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
netstat -a will show all listening ports.
Are all of the sql services running? What event log entries?
Are you *sure* it used to work? Back out the changes if so.
Richard
Are all of the sql services running? What event log entries?
Are you *sure* it used to work? Back out the changes if so.
Richard
#7
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Start the SQL Server Network Utility in SQL Server 2000. Select TCP, click Properties, and then enter the additional port separated by a comma; for example: 1433,5000.
Stop and then restart the SQL Server server, and review the errorlog. Your errorlog should resemble the following:
SQL server listening on TCP, Shared Memory, Named Pipes.<BR/>
SQL server listening on 157.54.178.42:1433, 157.54.178.42:5000, 127.0.0.1:1433, 127.0.0.1:5000.
Use the SQL Server Client Network Utility to modify your clients to spread the load accross the TCP ports. For example, two Web servers, both connecting to the same SQL Server on port 1433, can now split the load across 1433 and 5000. This allows the administrator to separate the traffic across multiple ports and increases the connection throughput.
Stop and then restart the SQL Server server, and review the errorlog. Your errorlog should resemble the following:
SQL server listening on TCP, Shared Memory, Named Pipes.<BR/>
SQL server listening on 157.54.178.42:1433, 157.54.178.42:5000, 127.0.0.1:1433, 127.0.0.1:5000.
Use the SQL Server Client Network Utility to modify your clients to spread the load accross the TCP ports. For example, two Web servers, both connecting to the same SQL Server on port 1433, can now split the load across 1433 and 5000. This allows the administrator to separate the traffic across multiple ports and increases the connection throughput.
Trending Topics
#9
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Bore Knee Muff
Posts: 3,666
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for the info guys.
David - Did what you said:
Start the SQL Server Network Utility in SQL Server 2000. Select TCP, click Properties, and then enter the additional port separated by a comma; for example: 1433,5000.
Stop and then restart the SQL Server server, and review the errorlog. Your errorlog should resemble the following:
SQL server listening on TCP, Shared Memory, Named Pipes.<BR/>
SQL server listening on 157.54.178.42:1433, 157.54.178.42:5000, 127.0.0.1:1433, 127.0.0.1:5000.
All of that I did but the port seems to revert back to 2433 when I definatley typed in 1433. It said listening on 2433.
There were no errors in the event log viewer. This machine is running Windows98.
Arrrghhh. Any more ideas?
David - Did what you said:
Start the SQL Server Network Utility in SQL Server 2000. Select TCP, click Properties, and then enter the additional port separated by a comma; for example: 1433,5000.
Stop and then restart the SQL Server server, and review the errorlog. Your errorlog should resemble the following:
SQL server listening on TCP, Shared Memory, Named Pipes.<BR/>
SQL server listening on 157.54.178.42:1433, 157.54.178.42:5000, 127.0.0.1:1433, 127.0.0.1:5000.
All of that I did but the port seems to revert back to 2433 when I definatley typed in 1433. It said listening on 2433.
There were no errors in the event log viewer. This machine is running Windows98.
Arrrghhh. Any more ideas?
#10
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Bore Knee Muff
Posts: 3,666
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OK, so what does the hide server check box actually do?
After turning that off that doing it all again the port is now open.
Thanks for the info guys.
After turning that off that doing it all again the port is now open.
Thanks for the info guys.
#13
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
eh... do you mean the computer you are trying to connect to it with is running windows 98??
Mail me direct at work if you want david dot wallis at ventura dash uk dot com.. (sorry dont want junk mail!)
David
Mail me direct at work if you want david dot wallis at ventura dash uk dot com.. (sorry dont want junk mail!)
David
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
28 December 2015 11:07 PM