alcazar

iTrader: (2)

Apparently, now, a new law has come in which states that, if you work with children, or vulnerable adults, and live with anyone who has anything on their CRB that would preclude them doing the same, YOU must be suspended???

How the fukc has THAT got onto the statute book????

So now we will punish innocent people because of something their partners might have done...and already paid for?????

WTF is this country coming to?????

pflowers

CRB checks went a while ago - now DBS checks.

The Trooper 1815

iTrader: (31)

Tomatoes - Tomatos. Or Disclosure Scotland depending if you are a thistle muncher.

dpb

Guilt by association?

Raptorman

iTrader: (1)

Makes sense to me.

Example.

Mrs.Smith works at nursery school, her husband Mr.Smith is a convicted
paedophile and as such he would have more chance of contact with kids.

Would you be happy if your kids were being taught by someone in
that situation?

Miniman

iTrader: (2)

No, plus I'm also not happy that they are placing peado's in the community. They have access to my kids too. I think they should be run out of town or lynched. Or nuked from orbit - that would solve it.

Though that won't happen so I'm going to lock my kids in their rooms instead until the are 18.

Shaid

My wife works with vulnerable folk.

If I had a 'record' for an incident of assault or canabis would this = suspension?

dpb

And what about car driving infringements

alcazar

iTrader: (2)

Dunno the answer to the above two. I'll find out later this week.

Are you serious?

What does Mrs Smith's partner's previous life have to do with the way Mrs Smith treats the kids???
How does her working there get HIM access?

It's lunacy.

CrisPDuk

Really

How does Mrs smith working at a school give Mr Smith access

I can't speak for you, but I've never spent any time at my wife's place of work, I spend too much at my own

wayne9t9

Does operation yewtree know about mr Smith? he sounds like a perv to me.

dpb

Why exactly would he have MORE access to children as a result of being a peado

Chip

Link?

alcazar

iTrader: (2)

Can't yet...it's something from the education community in N.Lincs.

Turbohot

Valid query. You do get an occasional brain wave sometimes.

Raptorman

iTrader: (1)

My example was just that, an example.

But, it's not a million miles away from the female nursery worker
who was taking inappropriate images of children in her care and
sending them to a paedophile she met online.

alcazar

iTrader: (2)

Ah, but then SHE is the paedo too........

Raptorman

iTrader: (1)

Yes, but you can see how it's possible that someone
can be influenced by another into doing something
even when two people haven't even met in the flesh.

alcazar

iTrader: (2)

Could be, yes.

But then, they don't need to be partners, so how is the law any good?

Raptorman

iTrader: (1)

Is this a actual law or some regional ruling type of thing?

alcazar

iTrader: (2)

I'm unsure as yet....my contact finds out later this month.

IF, and only if, it's as I've said, I cannot see it getting past the ECHR?

I mean: your partner or your job????