Real cause of Concorde flight 4590 flight on 25th July 2000
11 February 2013, 01:16 AM
#1
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Real cause of Concorde flight 4590 flight on 25th July 2000
This message has been sent to Julian Assange:
Here is some text regarding the crash of Concorde flight 4590 on 25th July 2000,
if anything happens to me I would like you to have the text so you can publish it if necessary, the reason my life is in Danger is that it was the US and Boeing that brought the Concorde aircraft down and killed 113 people, but they don't want to face up to what they did, and are now trying to blame me for events
that were outside my control, I may publish the text on various web forum sites
... around the world anyway, it is in html format so you can just copy and paste the text into your web page: I encourage everyone around the world to copy and paste the text into web sites around the world.
<p align="center"><b>It appears now that the Concorde crash of flight 4590 in France on 25th July 2000 was not an accident at all,<br>
but that the aircraft was cleverly sabotaged to make it look like an accident.<br>
The full details are unclear but the basics of the event involved a device located under the port wing that blew a large hole in it<br>
and caused a massive fuel leak, it is also likely that the device ignited the fuel. The undercarriage spacer that was 'missing' caused<br>
the aircraft to veer off the runway during the takeoff run, this forced the pilot to take off at a low airspeed, engines 1&2 then<br>
failed at around the critical point of lift off, this all happened when it was too late to avoid the take off run as there was<br>
insufficient runway left to stop the aircraft. The aircraft was also overloaded with extra luggage that didn't belong to any of<br>
the passengers. Regardless of the effects of the intense fire, the lack of airspeed and the resulting assymmetic thrust caused<br>
by the failure of the engines on the port wing, which meant the aircraft never reached a safe controllable airspeed.As the effects<br>
of the assymmetric thrust took hold the port wing started to drop due to the lack of lift at the low airspeed,the aircraft<br>
effectively stalled and crashed into the hotel killing 113 people. It is quite likely if it hadn't been for all these<br>
additional factors designed to bring the aircraft down that even with the severe fire it might have been possible to make<br>
the remaining 3km to the runway at Le Bourget, but in the end the Pilots were betrayed and never stood a chance.<br>
</p>
Here is some text regarding the crash of Concorde flight 4590 on 25th July 2000,
if anything happens to me I would like you to have the text so you can publish it if necessary, the reason my life is in Danger is that it was the US and Boeing that brought the Concorde aircraft down and killed 113 people, but they don't want to face up to what they did, and are now trying to blame me for events
that were outside my control, I may publish the text on various web forum sites
... around the world anyway, it is in html format so you can just copy and paste the text into your web page: I encourage everyone around the world to copy and paste the text into web sites around the world.
<p align="center"><b>It appears now that the Concorde crash of flight 4590 in France on 25th July 2000 was not an accident at all,<br>
but that the aircraft was cleverly sabotaged to make it look like an accident.<br>
The full details are unclear but the basics of the event involved a device located under the port wing that blew a large hole in it<br>
and caused a massive fuel leak, it is also likely that the device ignited the fuel. The undercarriage spacer that was 'missing' caused<br>
the aircraft to veer off the runway during the takeoff run, this forced the pilot to take off at a low airspeed, engines 1&2 then<br>
failed at around the critical point of lift off, this all happened when it was too late to avoid the take off run as there was<br>
insufficient runway left to stop the aircraft. The aircraft was also overloaded with extra luggage that didn't belong to any of<br>
the passengers. Regardless of the effects of the intense fire, the lack of airspeed and the resulting assymmetic thrust caused<br>
by the failure of the engines on the port wing, which meant the aircraft never reached a safe controllable airspeed.As the effects<br>
of the assymmetric thrust took hold the port wing started to drop due to the lack of lift at the low airspeed,the aircraft<br>
effectively stalled and crashed into the hotel killing 113 people. It is quite likely if it hadn't been for all these<br>
additional factors designed to bring the aircraft down that even with the severe fire it might have been possible to make<br>
the remaining 3km to the runway at Le Bourget, but in the end the Pilots were betrayed and never stood a chance.<br>
</p>
11 February 2013, 07:19 AM
#2
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Coventry
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Probably the same person who sent me a message saying I won't the Ugandan lottery... I don't believe everything I read.
Conspiracy theorists really need to get lives
Conspiracy theorists really need to get lives
11 February 2013, 10:51 AM
#6
What a load of ****. Probably the words of a disgruntled X boeing employee! As if air crash investigators would not find this evidence or even keep it quiet if they had!
Trending Topics
11 February 2013, 04:34 PM
#11
Not one I've ever heard of but you lot slagging conspiracy theorists really need to take a long hard look at some of the facts. People worried about the effects of asbestos were called conspiracy theorists in the 50/60s as where people suspicious that America was building an atomic bomb during ww2 (manhattan project), well we know how that turned out. If you believe things like accident reports or government reports cannot be corrupted/rigged then you are very much mistaken. Look at the 911 report, 6 of the original panel have now openly admitted they flat lied in the report FACT. Yet not a sniff of the US taking another look at it or even admitting somethings wrong. No ones asking you to walk around with tin foil on your head but just try to pay more attention to what you are told by government/media and question it critically. You will find lots of things that don't add up.
11 February 2013, 04:53 PM
#12
Not one I've ever heard of but you lot slagging conspiracy theorists really need to take a long hard look at some of the facts. People worried about the effects of asbestos were called conspiracy theorists in the 50/60s as where people suspicious that America was building an atomic bomb during ww2 (manhattan project), well we know how that turned out. If you believe things like accident reports or government reports cannot be corrupted/rigged then you are very much mistaken. Look at the 911 report, 6 of the original panel have now openly admitted they flat lied in the report FACT. Yet not a sniff of the US taking another look at it or even admitting somethings wrong. No ones asking you to walk around with tin foil on your head but just try to pay more attention to what you are told by government/media and question it critically. You will find lots of things that don't add up.
I'm not saying the Concorde thing is true but I've been around long enough to realise that the powers that be will 'adjust, re-word, make secret or just plain lie' about things they don't want you to be in full knowledge of, and if you think otherwise, you're living in cloud cuckoo land.
JohnD
11 February 2013, 05:33 PM
#13
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Newcastle upon tyne
Posts: 2,750
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Certain amount of truth there.
I'm not saying the Concorde thing is true but I've been around long enough to realise that the powers that be will 'adjust, re-word, make secret or just plain lie' about things they don't want you to be in full knowledge of, and if you think otherwise, you're living in cloud cuckoo land.
JohnD
I'm not saying the Concorde thing is true but I've been around long enough to realise that the powers that be will 'adjust, re-word, make secret or just plain lie' about things they don't want you to be in full knowledge of, and if you think otherwise, you're living in cloud cuckoo land.
JohnD
11 February 2013, 07:00 PM
#14
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Newcastle upon tyne
Posts: 2,750
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Relax guys am jst havin a laugh
But seriously , it's old news & am sure the family's won't be interested
In all this clap trap air France settled 10m euro I think the sum was to each deceased
If this were true - they would be in court fighting for it back I'm bloody sure of that
But seriously , it's old news & am sure the family's won't be interested
In all this clap trap air France settled 10m euro I think the sum was to each deceased
If this were true - they would be in court fighting for it back I'm bloody sure of that
11 February 2013, 07:20 PM
#15
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: north of the south border
Posts: 4,510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Certain amount of truth there.
I'm not saying the Concorde thing is true but I've been around long enough to realise that the powers that be will 'adjust, re-word, make secret or just plain lie' about things they don't want you to be in full knowledge of, and if you think otherwise, you're living in cloud cuckoo land.
JohnD
I'm not saying the Concorde thing is true but I've been around long enough to realise that the powers that be will 'adjust, re-word, make secret or just plain lie' about things they don't want you to be in full knowledge of, and if you think otherwise, you're living in cloud cuckoo land.
JohnD
11 February 2013, 10:13 PM
#16
I'm not saying that at all but I do know there's a bloke who looks suspiciuosly like Elvis working in the kebab house in North St Romford!
JohnD
PS WTF is this thread doing in General Technical
JohnD
PS WTF is this thread doing in General Technical
Last edited by JohnD; 11 February 2013 at 10:17 PM.
12 February 2013, 12:06 AM
#17
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: west midlands
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not one I've ever heard of but you lot slagging conspiracy theorists really need to take a long hard look at some of the facts. People worried about the effects of asbestos were called conspiracy theorists in the 50/60s as where people suspicious that America was building an atomic bomb during ww2 (manhattan project), well we know how that turned out. If you believe things like accident reports or government reports cannot be corrupted/rigged then you are very much mistaken. Look at the 911 report, 6 of the original panel have now openly admitted they flat lied in the report FACT. Yet not a sniff of the US taking another look at it or even admitting somethings wrong. No ones asking you to walk around with tin foil on your head but just try to pay more attention to what you are told by government/media and question it critically. You will find lots of things that don't add up.
12 February 2013, 05:05 AM
#18
Conspiracy theory???
Go travel the world.... read a few books on cultural politics.....
The world is dirty.... were all corrupt!
Theres no conspiracy.... just stupid people who cant see past their rose coloured tv sets....
911...? conspiracy...? of course it was "conspiracy"
a bunch of highly trained suicidal political activists killed loads of guilty westeners!!!
turn your TV off and go outside!!!
Go travel the world.... read a few books on cultural politics.....
The world is dirty.... were all corrupt!
Theres no conspiracy.... just stupid people who cant see past their rose coloured tv sets....
911...? conspiracy...? of course it was "conspiracy"
a bunch of highly trained suicidal political activists killed loads of guilty westeners!!!
turn your TV off and go outside!!!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sam Witwicky
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
17
13 November 2015 10:49 AM
