Notices

2.5L CDB from Litchfield - opinions?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18 January 2012, 12:35 PM
  #1  
MadUsa1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
MadUsa1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Default 2.5L CDB from Litchfield - opinions?

Just seen these on their website, seems like a new product from them.

Anyone tried one yet? Looks like a nice set up:

http://www.litchfieldimports.co.uk/s...7_upgrades.asp
Old 18 January 2012, 01:25 PM
  #2  
MOTORS S GT
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
MOTORS S GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Northampton
Posts: 1,253
Likes: 0
Received 34 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Read through Bob Rawle's project in the projects section, you will find it includes what your looking for.

Last edited by MOTORS S GT; 18 January 2012 at 01:27 PM.
Old 18 January 2012, 01:45 PM
  #3  
joz8968
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
 
joz8968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Leicester
Posts: 23,761
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Surely this is the holy grail of 2.5s?!

Ringland issues no more (given a decent ECU map of course)?!
Old 18 January 2012, 01:57 PM
  #4  
Turbovin
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Turbovin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sweden
Posts: 678
Received 37 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

I'm guessing it's even more expensive than a CDB 2.35l?
Old 18 January 2012, 02:02 PM
  #5  
beliblisk
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (16)
 
beliblisk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Ljubljana,Slovenia
Posts: 1,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Turbovin
I'm guessing it's even more expensive than a CDB 2.35l?
...and 2,35s aint exactly cheap:S
Old 18 January 2012, 02:08 PM
  #6  
rickya
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (18)
 
rickya's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Herts/Middx
Posts: 6,322
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

It looks good
Old 18 January 2012, 02:19 PM
  #7  
Billet
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (60)
 
Billet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: West Mids
Posts: 2,567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Can't you achieve the same result as in the picture, if you rebored a CDB to a 2.5 or had some deck plates put into a S-CDB OR ODB 2.5, converting it to a CDB 2.5?
Old 18 January 2012, 02:28 PM
  #8  
MadUsa1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
MadUsa1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Thanks for the responses folks. I noticed the Bob Rawle has been using one of these for a while, I was wondering if there are any others.

I've asked Litchfield for some prices but haven't heard anything back yet.

I'm not sure how the insert actually works, it looks like a single piece that gets somehow secured to the deck. It might still be that a bored out EJ22 CDB would be stronger since it's a solid closed deck rather than an insert.

I was actually sort of hoping this would be a cheaper option than a 2.35, but I could be wrong...
Old 18 January 2012, 02:28 PM
  #9  
Alan Jeffery
Scooby Regular
 
Alan Jeffery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by joz8968
Surely this is the holy grail of 2.5s?!

Ringland issues no more (given a decent ECU map of course)?!
Being fair, strictly speaking the ringland issues with the 2.5 are more to do with piston quality than open/closed deck.
We'd all like to think this is a fix for the issue, as always, time will tell!
It's certainly a neat piece of engineering.
Old 18 January 2012, 02:29 PM
  #10  
MadUsa1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
MadUsa1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tazz
Can't you achieve the same result as in the picture, if you rebored a CDB to a 2.5 or had some deck plates put into a S-CDB OR ODB 2.5, converting it to a CDB 2.5?
I think that's exactly what Litchfield have done: they've taken a standard 2.5 block and used an insert to close the deck.

I'm just not sure how the insert is actually bonded to the block, I could imagine the insert lifting from the deck under changes in temperature, which could be trouble.
Old 18 January 2012, 02:33 PM
  #11  
MadUsa1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
MadUsa1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Jeffery
Being fair, strictly speaking the ringland issues with the 2.5 are more to do with piston quality than open/closed deck.
We'd all like to think this is a fix for the issue, as always, time will tell!
It's certainly a neat piece of engineering.
I guess the main benefits of converting the 2.5 to a CDB are:

1) To secure the headgasket more firmly (larger area for it to mate to)
2) To provide more support for the tops of the cylinders, to stop them distorting under high pressure

But I'm just guessing here...
Old 19 January 2012, 10:25 AM
  #12  
Alan Jeffery
Scooby Regular
 
Alan Jeffery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MadUsa1
I guess the main benefits of converting the 2.5 to a CDB are:

1) To secure the headgasket more firmly (larger area for it to mate to)
2) To provide more support for the tops of the cylinders, to stop them distorting under high pressure

But I'm just guessing here...
It's 2) rather than 1)
I think we all wish Subaru made them strong to start with. Somewhere there's an executive with a lot to answer for!
Old 19 January 2012, 10:36 AM
  #13  
New_scooby_04
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
New_scooby_04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Jeffery
I think we all wish Subaru made them strong to start with. Somewhere there's an executive with a lot to answer for!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JXh4xf49hYk

Old 19 January 2012, 12:45 PM
  #14  
MadUsa1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
MadUsa1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Jeffery
It's 2) rather than 1)
I think we all wish Subaru made them strong to start with. Somewhere there's an executive with a lot to answer for!
Thanks Alan. I always thought the CDB helped to seat the HG better than the ODB so there's less chance of blow through.

You're right about the exec though - imagine the money they've spent replacing all those broken 2.5L engines, not to mention the reputation damage. Would it not have been cheaper in the long run to use a CDB 2.5 and a set of forged pistons?
Old 19 January 2012, 01:31 PM
  #15  
matt-c
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
matt-c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Essex
Posts: 1,531
Received 118 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

Did we find out how much these blocks cost?
Old 19 January 2012, 03:47 PM
  #16  
Alan Jeffery
Scooby Regular
 
Alan Jeffery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MadUsa1
Thanks Alan. I always thought the CDB helped to seat the HG better than the ODB so there's less chance of blow through.

You're right about the exec though - imagine the money they've spent replacing all those broken 2.5L engines, not to mention the reputation damage. Would it not have been cheaper in the long run to use a CDB 2.5 and a set of forged pistons?
It would, and then some I think. It's a classic case of college educated idiots overruling engineers.

Subaru are by no means the only manufacturers making expensive mistakes.
We have a 55 plate Audi A4 diesel in now with a broken oil pump drive. It's a single row chain and wouldn't look out of place on your toddler's pedal car.
Apparently these cars are dying like flies with only 70/80 thousand on the clock. Worse, the parts are back order, and haven't been available for three months at least due to demand!
Old 19 January 2012, 06:01 PM
  #17  
MOTORS S GT
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
MOTORS S GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Northampton
Posts: 1,253
Likes: 0
Received 34 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Jeffery
It would, and then some I think. It's a classic case of college educated idiots overruling engineers.

Subaru are by no means the only manufacturers making expensive mistakes.
We have a 55 plate Audi A4 diesel in now with a broken oil pump drive. It's a single row chain and wouldn't look out of place on your toddler's pedal car.
Apparently these cars are dying like flies with only 70/80 thousand on the clock. Worse, the parts are back order, and haven't been available for three months at least due to demand!
I have done a few of these Audi / VW oil pump failures, i agree totally Alan, although i think if you fitted a childs bike sprocket, it would be classed as an upgrade.
Old 19 January 2012, 06:55 PM
  #18  
toyney83
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
toyney83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: grimsby
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i thought main failures with 2.5 were liners ballooning and/or moving? would a custom linered 2.5 not do a job?
Old 19 January 2012, 08:13 PM
  #19  
bigarf
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (67)
 
bigarf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: w,yorkshire
Posts: 4,061
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by toyney83
i thought main failures with 2.5 were liners ballooning and/or moving? would a custom linered 2.5 not do a job?
depends on who did the liners.many claim they can fit stronger liners but the truth is,many have failed.miserably.
Old 19 January 2012, 09:31 PM
  #20  
jazzyjembreaze
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
jazzyjembreaze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Newcastle upon tyne
Posts: 2,750
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Fitting new liners is very expensive
Back to this Lichfield CDB if u follow bobs project he had the block chemically treated to stop movement of the heads so not sure if it is just a liner prob creating movement ? Anybody
Old 19 January 2012, 09:48 PM
  #21  
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Andy.F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Alyn at ASPerformance is also doing a similar closed deck block modification, price is circa £500-£600 I believe.

http://bbs.22b.com/cgi-bin/ultimateb...=001901#000009
Old 20 January 2012, 12:17 PM
  #22  
MadUsa1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
MadUsa1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

How do these inserts actually woke though? Are they welded into the block or do they just sit there? Is there any concern about different rates of expansion between the two different materials?
Old 20 January 2012, 10:28 PM
  #23  
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Andy.F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Just a light interference fit from a material with similar expansion rates to the block.

Will let you know how it performs when I get my closed deck EG33 block fitted shortly, anything under 1300bhp will be considered a 'fail' !
Old 20 January 2012, 10:32 PM
  #24  
g7prs
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
g7prs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,197
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Andy.F
Just a light interference fit from a material with similar expansion rates to the block.

Will let you know how it performs when I get my closed deck EG33 block fitted shortly, anything under 1300bhp will be considered a 'fail' !

Holy $hit 1300 I hope you have bigger brakes on it since the last time i saw them
Old 21 January 2012, 07:45 AM
  #25  
MadUsa1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
MadUsa1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Andy.F
Just a light interference fit from a material with similar expansion rates to the block.

Will let you know how it performs when I get my closed deck EG33 block fitted shortly, anything under 1300bhp will be considered a 'fail' !
Interference fit?

Not sure i like the sound of that, particularly since they machine away the standard cylinder strengtheners to fit these.
Old 21 January 2012, 07:49 PM
  #26  
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Andy.F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

If it has any clearance it will fret due to the combustion pressure causing movement at the interface. Don't see a problem with a light interference fit considering the liners will be rebored and honed after plate fitment.
Old 13 October 2012, 09:59 PM
  #27  
kb1
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
kb1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Any up date guys?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KAS35RSTI
Subaru
27
04 November 2021 07:12 PM
bluebullet29
General Technical
9
05 October 2015 02:17 PM
type-ra
Member's Gallery
14
27 September 2015 10:29 PM
bluebullet29
General Technical
2
27 September 2015 07:52 PM
ossett2k2
General Technical
1
17 September 2015 04:55 PM



Quick Reply: 2.5L CDB from Litchfield - opinions?



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:41 PM.