anyone run an APS SR50 turbo on 2L
#1
anyone run an APS SR50 turbo on 2L
as above anyone running one of these aps sr50 turbos on a 2L engine?
done a search but does not really bring too much up about it, would be interested to hear what supporting mods, what figures bhp and lb what spool and what boost etc etc
engine will be sti7 with avcs and will have supporting mods tmic only at this time, may be changed to fmic though, the usual decat etc, running a vf35 at 340bhp currently.
Grant
done a search but does not really bring too much up about it, would be interested to hear what supporting mods, what figures bhp and lb what spool and what boost etc etc
engine will be sti7 with avcs and will have supporting mods tmic only at this time, may be changed to fmic though, the usual decat etc, running a vf35 at 340bhp currently.
Grant
#2
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
Hi Grant
this will help
https://www.scoobynet.com/drivetrain...w-much-hp.html
Depends how much for this turbo,because from reports making around 400-440bhp+
Jura
this will help
https://www.scoobynet.com/drivetrain...w-much-hp.html
Depends how much for this turbo,because from reports making around 400-440bhp+
Jura
#6
i have an SR40 and it compares to an 18g turbo, you need to really push it to get 400bhp it would seem, most make anywhere between 360-380. i think the 50 is better suited to the 2.5 but will be quite laggy on a 2.0. out of interest why are you choosing this turbo when there are far better options available? do you already have it or is it going cheap?
#7
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Littlehampton
Posts: 2,427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Don't do it!!
I have the APS SR40 on my 2.5 (405BHP - the most JGM has seen from one of these historically under-performing turbos) and it does spool pretty well (AVCS Heads ported headers, Harvey custom up-pipe), when it was on the 2.0 it was sh*t!
Only 1 bar at 4250rpm and only 370BHP - remember that APS quote this as a 440BHP turbo!!! The SR50 will be even more laggy and you'll be lucky to see much over 400 on a 2.0.
Graph from when it was on the 2.0 lower figures were without ported headers and on std manifold/inlet pie.
I'd get in touch with AET turbos, or just buy an off the shelf MD321, MD555 or SC turbo!
I have the APS SR40 on my 2.5 (405BHP - the most JGM has seen from one of these historically under-performing turbos) and it does spool pretty well (AVCS Heads ported headers, Harvey custom up-pipe), when it was on the 2.0 it was sh*t!
Only 1 bar at 4250rpm and only 370BHP - remember that APS quote this as a 440BHP turbo!!! The SR50 will be even more laggy and you'll be lucky to see much over 400 on a 2.0.
Graph from when it was on the 2.0 lower figures were without ported headers and on std manifold/inlet pie.
I'd get in touch with AET turbos, or just buy an off the shelf MD321, MD555 or SC turbo!
Last edited by BlueBugEye; 03 July 2011 at 02:12 PM. Reason: Posted wrong graph!
Trending Topics
#11
ah now thats better yes i think 370 odd is the rough figure which these turbos seem to get, but just so i understand better, how much bar were you running to get 370 on the sr40?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Scott@ScoobySpares
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
61
11 January 2021 03:08 PM
aaron_ions
General Technical
1
17 September 2015 10:42 AM