Best turbo upgrade for hawkeye 2.0 sti JDM
#1
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Tividale, near Dudley, West Mids
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Best turbo upgrade for hawkeye 2.0 sti JDM
Anyone got any advise on the best turbo upgrade for my 55 reg sti JDM Hawkeye? Currently has twin scroll as standard. And what intercooler do you recommend, top mount or front? Looking for around 400-450 bhp!
#3
Personally I would talk to Ian at Litchfields and see what he says, but I can highly recommend the 420 with 800cc injectors, induction kit and other bits n bobs and then mapped by Richard Bulmer
#4
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Tividale, near Dudley, West Mids
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Agreed, I have the LM420 S60 with supporting mods and I am well chuffed with this set up. There is another thread on here by Shaun (Starting again with a Hawkeye) and he has gone for the LM400.
Personally I would talk to Ian at Litchfields and see what he says, but I can highly recommend the 420 with 800cc injectors, induction kit and other bits n bobs and then mapped by Richard Bulmer
Personally I would talk to Ian at Litchfields and see what he says, but I can highly recommend the 420 with 800cc injectors, induction kit and other bits n bobs and then mapped by Richard Bulmer
#5
Yes they do mate, I live up North so I went for a local chap to fit it and then mapped by RB, but if I could wind back the clock I would have had the installtion at Litchfields, not sure who he uses for mapping but they will be very good. (I will now always use Richard Bulmer though> dont want to turn this into who's the best mapper )
#7
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Prices are on their website, your looking at 3.5-4k all in for everything, the lm420 loses a bit down low but gives a bit more bhp at the top, the 400 is meant to be similar to the vf37 but stronger at the top end.
Tony
Tony
Trending Topics
#8
I think you will be looking at 3.5k all in, I had a few other things done at the same time so I cant remember to be honest, but my car is running 420bhp/400torx now that RB has mapped it.
My car has obviously been driven by RB who also mapped Shaun's, RB reckoned my car is spot on and is a great option. I have never driven Shauns or a car with the LM400 so I cant say.
It would be worth calling Ian Litchfield and possibly Richard at Tracktive Solutions for there advice first hand
My car has obviously been driven by RB who also mapped Shaun's, RB reckoned my car is spot on and is a great option. I have never driven Shauns or a car with the LM400 so I cant say.
It would be worth calling Ian Litchfield and possibly Richard at Tracktive Solutions for there advice first hand
#14
I believe if you run the LM400 you can do it a lot cheaper> £2500?
I wanted to get the very most out of my turbo so I fitted uprated injectors and induction kit. Again if you speak to Richard Bulmer at Tracktive Solutions you can here it from the horses mouth > he said my LM420 was "brutal" compared to the LM400, and I quote "you wouldnt believe how much more powerful the 420 is compared to the 400" the difference in lag is very little, but hey I have the 420 so my opinion will probably be biased even when trying not to be I LOVE IT
#15
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Tividale, near Dudley, West Mids
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Have a look at Shauns thread (Starting again with a Hawkeye)
I believe if you run the LM400 you can do it a lot cheaper> £2500?
I wanted to get the very most out of my turbo so I fitted uprated injectors and induction kit. Again if you speak to Richard Bulmer at Tracktive Solutions you can here it from the horses mouth > he said my LM420 was "brutal" compared to the LM400, and I quote "you wouldnt believe how much more powerful the 420 is compared to the 400" the difference in lag is very little, but hey I have the 420 so my opinion will probably be biased even when trying not to be I LOVE IT
I believe if you run the LM400 you can do it a lot cheaper> £2500?
I wanted to get the very most out of my turbo so I fitted uprated injectors and induction kit. Again if you speak to Richard Bulmer at Tracktive Solutions you can here it from the horses mouth > he said my LM420 was "brutal" compared to the LM400, and I quote "you wouldnt believe how much more powerful the 420 is compared to the 400" the difference in lag is very little, but hey I have the 420 so my opinion will probably be biased even when trying not to be I LOVE IT
#16
Scooby Regular
#21
Yep I am still on the standard 2006 Spec C TMIC and when I asked Richard if it needed a FMIC? he replied no he has mapped it correctly for the parts it has
There are other parts like 3 port boost valve but I am not that technical myself mate, I know there were uprated braided oil lines and a few more bits, but at the time I simply asked Ian Litchfield what should I buy to get the very most out of the turbo and I bought the parts.
The one part I did buy which in hind sight I may have bought differently is the induction kit, I went for the RCM engine bay cone type, I know a lot of others go for the inner wing type? personally I dont like the look of them and my car goes very well as it is but you may be better off with the inner wing kit?
#24
I am sure you would agree that Dave is best talking to Ian or Richard Bulmer for best advice (dont even know what exhaust Dave is running or anything?)
#25
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Tividale, near Dudley, West Mids
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Shaun, I would honestly bow to your superior knowledge on most technical things, but Ian himself stated my car would be held back by the standard air box, he reckons there good up to 400
I am sure you would agree that Dave is best talking to Ian or Richard Bulmer for best advice (dont even know what exhaust Dave is running or anything?)
I am sure you would agree that Dave is best talking to Ian or Richard Bulmer for best advice (dont even know what exhaust Dave is running or anything?)
#26
Scooby Regular
Shaun, I would honestly bow to your superior knowledge on most technical things, but Ian himself stated my car would be held back by the standard air box, he reckons there good up to 400
I am sure you would agree that Dave is best talking to Ian or Richard Bulmer for best advice (dont even know what exhaust Dave is running or anything?)
I am sure you would agree that Dave is best talking to Ian or Richard Bulmer for best advice (dont even know what exhaust Dave is running or anything?)
I will be testing this in the future to see how much more power the OE box will allow.... I'm sure others have gone further than 400bhp. The MKII Type25 was 420bhp on the OE box.
Anyway I digress, so apologies.
#27
If Iain made that statement, then this is one (probably the only) thing I would not agree with him on.
I will be testing this in the future to see how much more power the OE box will allow.... I'm sure others have gone further than 400bhp. The MKII Type25 was 420bhp on the OE box.
Anyway I digress, so apologies.
I will be testing this in the future to see how much more power the OE box will allow.... I'm sure others have gone further than 400bhp. The MKII Type25 was 420bhp on the OE box.
Anyway I digress, so apologies.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post