Notices

wha's the truth about hawkeye pistons?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24 September 2010, 10:50 AM
  #1  
Rick16v
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Rick16v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Preston
Posts: 40
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default wha's the truth about hawkeye pistons?

Hello folks.

I have a 2006 Spec D with 43000 on the clock, doesn't use very much oil. Was planning on getting remap/exhaust etc. Reading the scare stories about the pistons being weak has put me off. I've searched but still dont know the definitive answer. Am I asking for trouble? Are they a liability that may well break anyway? Is there anything I need to have checked or change?

Cheers,

Rick
Old 24 September 2010, 11:15 AM
  #2  
Butty
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Butty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: MY06 STi Spec D
Posts: 5,254
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

You won't know until it happens.
Oil/pistons wasn't the issue with mine, it was the heads relaxing resulting in head gasket leakage under boost in all cylinders.
Perhaps a leakdown check or coolant system pressure check - but that's about it unless you want to take the engine out and strip it.
Old 24 September 2010, 11:58 AM
  #3  
a5h
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
a5h's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: London
Posts: 1,778
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Rick,

I have a 56 plate Hawkeye with 17k on it. When i was buying mine i had a tough time with it all myself. What i found was the general consensus was that the piston were made of chocolate and over 320bhp was a case of when not if.
I wanted to eventually make 400- 450 so decided to replace the pistons with forged items but any more would require a complete build.

The best help i got was from a member on here call Fiestaboy who also did most of the work on my car to bring it up to its curent 342/362. I would advise either trying to contact Fiestaboy(he works out of Hiwycome/maidenhead) or talking to your intended mapper if you have one so you can get the whole picture. What you want to do with the car in the future will have a large impact on what you do now.

But in the end i think it was all worth it the car is such a different animal it has so much torque and just keeps on pulling. Has made love the car even more.
Old 24 September 2010, 12:31 PM
  #4  
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Tidgy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Notts
Posts: 23,118
Received 150 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by a5h
Rick,

I have a 56 plate Hawkeye with 17k on it. When i was buying mine i had a tough time with it all myself. What i found was the general consensus was that the piston were made of chocolate and over 320bhp was a case of when not if.
I wanted to eventually make 400- 450 so decided to replace the pistons with forged items but any more would require a complete build.

The best help i got was from a member on here call Fiestaboy who also did most of the work on my car to bring it up to its curent 342/362. I would advise either trying to contact Fiestaboy(he works out of Hiwycome/maidenhead) or talking to your intended mapper if you have one so you can get the whole picture. What you want to do with the car in the future will have a large impact on what you do now.

But in the end i think it was all worth it the car is such a different animal it has so much torque and just keeps on pulling. Has made love the car even more.
assuming its a 2.5 i've seen better results from standard engines decatted and remapped than 340/360 :s

even the old 2.0 classics uk turbo engine will run fine over 320, not sure where you got that figure from, seems a bit overly cautious to me.

P.S. i;ve got a uk turbo running 340/315 for the past 3 years (although don;t do huge milage in it)
Old 24 September 2010, 12:51 PM
  #5  
dynamix
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
dynamix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: near you
Posts: 9,708
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

See STD ones go just as much as modified ones.

Pistons will see 400/400 if det free.

350-360 is pretty straightforward and safe.
Old 24 September 2010, 03:20 PM
  #6  
I Catman
Scooby Regular
 
I Catman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I was told it was the 08 hatch wich had a batch of bad pistons.
Old 24 September 2010, 03:23 PM
  #7  
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Tidgy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Notts
Posts: 23,118
Received 150 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by I Catman
I was told it was the 08 hatch wich had a batch of bad pistons.
wasn;t pistons, was the map that was the issue on the hatch as far as im aware
Old 24 September 2010, 04:10 PM
  #8  
alcazar
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
alcazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rl'yeh
Posts: 40,781
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

When I did my 2.5 build, I was advised by three different respected tuners on here to budget for forged pistons as a priority. In the end, the car got rods, pistons and ACL Race bearings.

Approx 400/400
Old 24 September 2010, 06:25 PM
  #9  
a5h
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
a5h's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: London
Posts: 1,778
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I read on hear that there were some 08's with a batch of dodgy pistons or something to do with the map causing a det issue can recall exactly which one to be honest. I have always been told that as the 2.5 has cast pistons rather than forged pistons it would not handle much beyond 1.6 -1.7 bar of boost. All the forged pistons do in my understanding is allow you to run higher boost pressure before they melt.
I bought mine from Cross Roads and they said it was very popular for them to change to forged pistons with the 2.5 type UK lump.

I standby speaking to your tuner who you intend to do the job and tell them exactly what you want. Then have a look at some old posts as there have been a number of discussions on this subject within this forum.

Good luck mate.

Last edited by a5h; 24 September 2010 at 06:28 PM.
Old 24 September 2010, 06:32 PM
  #10  
a5h
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
a5h's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: London
Posts: 1,778
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tidgy
assuming its a 2.5 i've seen better results from standard engines decatted and remapped than 340/360 :s

even the old 2.0 classics uk turbo engine will run fine over 320, not sure where you got that figure from, seems a bit overly cautious to me.

P.S. i;ve got a uk turbo running 340/315 for the past 3 years (although don;t do huge milage in it)
From what i understand mate its the boost pressure that is the issue with the cast pistons.

320bhp is a little cautious but as i had thrown £14k + £3k of mods of my money into a new car i think my wallet was only listening to the cautious advise. Just like Alcazar i was recommended by 2 tuners and most people in my local club that a piston change was advisable.
Old 24 September 2010, 07:28 PM
  #11  
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Tidgy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Notts
Posts: 23,118
Received 150 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by a5h
From what i understand mate its the boost pressure that is the issue with the cast pistons.

320bhp is a little cautious but as i had thrown £14k + £3k of mods of my money into a new car i think my wallet was only listening to the cautious advise. Just like Alcazar i was recommended by 2 tuners and most people in my local club that a piston change was advisable.
it realy depends what your aiming for, they arn't as strong as proper forged jobies, but 350 is easily achievable and stay on the safe side. I hear what your saying about wanting to stay safe though. just get the impression that saying it is trying to push you down the rebuild route when not needed.

Last edited by Tidgy; 24 September 2010 at 07:32 PM.
Old 24 September 2010, 07:36 PM
  #12  
Setright
Scooby Regular
 
Setright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The issue was the programming at the rev-limiter. The fuel cut was causing "mild" detonation.

The new map shuts off the ignition before the fuel, side-stepping the piston ring-land cracking detonation/knock, by avoiding a sudden lean mixture.
Old 24 September 2010, 07:52 PM
  #13  
Rick16v
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Rick16v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Preston
Posts: 40
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

many thanks for the replies. The feeling I get is it would be better safe than sorry. My plans are now changing. It seems rather than the performance bits and remap, maybe i should just spend my budget on the bloody pistons instead. Not sure I can afford both. Not what I had hoped, but I really couldnt afford my engine to go pop. I was warned scoobies were expensive. Was gonna use scoobyclinic. I will give them a buzz when I get back to england and see what they reckon. Cheers again.
Old 24 September 2010, 08:52 PM
  #14  
mark@wrx
Scooby Regular
 
mark@wrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Cumbrian Scoobs
Posts: 2,616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My 06 STI engine went with about 27k on the clock. Piston ring lands went and Subaru did the big FU job and refused to pay for it under warranty. I sent mine to API for a rebuild and remap and was totally happy with the price and results.
Old 25 September 2010, 03:11 PM
  #15  
a5h
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
a5h's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: London
Posts: 1,778
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tidgy
it realy depends what your aiming for, they arn't as strong as proper forged jobies, but 350 is easily achievable and stay on the safe side. I hear what your saying about wanting to stay safe though. just get the impression that saying it is trying to push you down the rebuild route when not needed.
I should point out that before I bought my car Cross Roads had to change the head gasket. As in the long run I want to see 400+ it was an ideal time to change the pistons as it only cost me the price of pistons, ARP head studs and 2 hours labour. So it was cost effective and would of needed to been done eventually so made perfect sense. From what I was told just putting the usual exhaust, filter and map would not require a rebuild.
Old 25 September 2010, 03:16 PM
  #16  
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Tidgy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Notts
Posts: 23,118
Received 150 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by a5h
I should point out that before I bought my car Cross Roads had to change the head gasket. As in the long run I want to see 400+ it was an ideal time to change the pistons as it only cost me the price of pistons, ARP head studs and 2 hours labour. So it was cost effective and would of needed to been done eventually so made perfect sense. From what I was told just putting the usual exhaust, filter and map would not require a rebuild.
yeah if that was the case then def worth doing at same time.
Old 25 September 2010, 03:19 PM
  #17  
cster
Scooby Regular
 
cster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,753
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by mark@wrx
My 06 STI engine went with about 27k on the clock. Piston ring lands went and Subaru did the big FU job and refused to pay for it under warranty. I sent mine to API for a rebuild and remap and was totally happy with the price and results.
I gather the engine was not modded?
Sounds a bit **** to only get 27K out of it.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
28 December 2015 11:07 PM
bluebullet29
General Technical
9
05 October 2015 02:17 PM
kenc
Wanted
6
02 October 2015 09:12 PM
Ganz1983
Subaru
5
02 October 2015 09:22 AM
MightyArsenal
Wheels, Tyres & Brakes
6
25 September 2015 08:31 PM



Quick Reply: wha's the truth about hawkeye pistons?



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:06 AM.