Is Apexi PFC really safe on a non-STI Classic? (Tuners?)
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Essex
Posts: 709
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is Apexi PFC really safe on a non-STI Classic? (Tuners?)
Hi all
I've been pondering this for a while. The OEM ECU on a UK classic (or specifically a MY99 UK car) does not measure inlet charge temperature (as no sensor is present). I can only assume that the knock strategy is relied on when it comes to high IAT's.
Now from what I understand, the Apexi PFC doesn't have a very good knock strategy, I think i've only seen a "knock count" value (does it have knock retard at all?).
If the above assumptions are correct, i'm curious as to how dangerous PFC really is on these cars in high IAT conditions (eg a hot summers day with a standard i/c). I mean, if the car is mapped on a cold day, what's it going to be like on a hot one? I'd be curious to how the mappers get around this, if they do at all.
I'm pretty surprised these cars don't all come with IAT sensors. Pretty daft.
Discuss
I've been pondering this for a while. The OEM ECU on a UK classic (or specifically a MY99 UK car) does not measure inlet charge temperature (as no sensor is present). I can only assume that the knock strategy is relied on when it comes to high IAT's.
Now from what I understand, the Apexi PFC doesn't have a very good knock strategy, I think i've only seen a "knock count" value (does it have knock retard at all?).
If the above assumptions are correct, i'm curious as to how dangerous PFC really is on these cars in high IAT conditions (eg a hot summers day with a standard i/c). I mean, if the car is mapped on a cold day, what's it going to be like on a hot one? I'd be curious to how the mappers get around this, if they do at all.
I'm pretty surprised these cars don't all come with IAT sensors. Pretty daft.
Discuss
#2
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
The PFC doesn't alter ign. tmg. whatsoever. It relies on the expertise of the mapper, so that it "never" causes det - i.e. mapped safely.
If you also have the Commander, then you can monitor the knocking level, so can see what's happening at any point in time.
Not sure how projected ambient temps are mapped around, though.
If you also have the Commander, then you can monitor the knocking level, so can see what's happening at any point in time.
Not sure how projected ambient temps are mapped around, though.
Last edited by joz8968; 05 September 2010 at 11:52 AM.
#3
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Essex
Posts: 709
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When I map a car I have a rule of thumb of retarding so many degrees of spark angle for every degree increase in inlet temps above say 55c IAT. Not really sure how you could simulate this on the PFC with mapping.
Always interested on being educated though
Trending Topics
#10
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Basic principles here. Intake temp is only partially referred to on any car. It's to allow for the differences encountered by running the car in either a Swedish Winter, or an African Summer. On a turbo car, it's charge temp that's the issue, which can be high even on a cold day. A stock Impreza ECU doesn't refer to it, relying only on knock detection, which is patchy at best. All mappers have at some stage come across a Scooby that's detting its head off, totally ignored by the ECU.
I'd say the trick is to set it up so it doesn't do it in the first place.
Correction tables have a measure of sliding scale, which should allow for extremes, if properly set up.
I'd say the trick is to set it up so it doesn't do it in the first place.
Correction tables have a measure of sliding scale, which should allow for extremes, if properly set up.
#11
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Essex
Posts: 709
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for the comment Alan. In the above I was solely referring to the inlet air temps the engine actually sees, charge temps.
Unless I misunderstood what you said, it seems that the way to safely map these is to do it 'worst case scenario' based on final spark angle you'd use with very hot IAT/ICT's to avoid det.. To me this seems that the final spark angle will end up much less than optimum for those cooler days..
Time for a decent ecu methinks...
Unless I misunderstood what you said, it seems that the way to safely map these is to do it 'worst case scenario' based on final spark angle you'd use with very hot IAT/ICT's to avoid det.. To me this seems that the final spark angle will end up much less than optimum for those cooler days..
Time for a decent ecu methinks...
#14
It has limitations like any ecu.
I'd say the apexi is good but if you pay more there are better ECU's out there.
To the original posters question - yes the apexi is safe on a non sti. The temperature sensor has a very limited use.
I'd say the apexi is good but if you pay more there are better ECU's out there.
To the original posters question - yes the apexi is safe on a non sti. The temperature sensor has a very limited use.
#15
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Northern Ireland. Part of the UK
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You claim to be a mapper, i view this from the statement "when i map a car" so i could be wrong here but the way im reading this is ,
You map cars for a hobby or to earn money? Have You have been asked to map a scooby on a PFC but you dont have a clue, so you come on here to extract the answers from the guys that do know!
Sorry mate if you have to ask, you should not be doing it!
Maybe i got you totally wrong and you want to map your own car on a PFC lol.
Too many self proclaimed mappers on here, the guys that really know what they are doing dont ask questions like this and are well respected. If this is some kind of ploy to get you out of a hole for something you dont know the solution for, pack away the laptop and get the sponge and bucket out again mate!
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for the comment Alan. In the above I was solely referring to the inlet air temps the engine actually sees, charge temps.
Unless I misunderstood what you said, it seems that the way to safely map these is to do it 'worst case scenario' based on final spark angle you'd use with very hot IAT/ICT's to avoid det.. To me this seems that the final spark angle will end up much less than optimum for those cooler days..
Time for a decent ecu methinks...
Unless I misunderstood what you said, it seems that the way to safely map these is to do it 'worst case scenario' based on final spark angle you'd use with very hot IAT/ICT's to avoid det.. To me this seems that the final spark angle will end up much less than optimum for those cooler days..
Time for a decent ecu methinks...
#17
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Essex
Posts: 709
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hobby.
I must disagree, information on Apexi strategies is extremely sketchy, hence asking the community.
Actually it's not a ploy for anything beyond my original question. I have broad general knowledge on engineering and tuning but my question was specific to how scooby 'mappers' as you call them getting around (read: bodging) the limitations of the OEM ECU and Apexi PFC with regards to managing charge temperatures. It was a question out of personal interest and curiousity, so no need to start piping up really
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post