Notices
General Technical
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Dyno'd today

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 22, 2010 | 09:05 PM
  #1  
Motion-Mx's Avatar
Motion-Mx
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 671
Likes: 0
From: Sheffield
Default Dyno'd today

Hey,

had my 03 STi Dyno'd today at Scoobyclinic,the output is what I thought so,pretty happy,happy there are no problems either.

the car is a UK car,has the following...

-prodrive fuel pump
-prodrive 3-port boost solenoid
-silicone intake hose
-group N panel filter
-full de-cat to prodrive back box
-Race Dynamix re map


here's some pic's, but the real reason i'm posting is...if I was to add a RCM intake kit and harveys headers,or maybe gt spec headers with a matching up pipe for either....would I see any noticeable improvements?

Thanks guy's!









Reply
Old May 22, 2010 | 09:10 PM
  #2  
BBB3's Avatar
BBB3
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 8
From: East Anglia
Default

how much torque you getting?
Reply
Old May 22, 2010 | 09:16 PM
  #3  
fastboyslim's Avatar
fastboyslim
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,272
Likes: 0
From: Twickenham
Default

Hey mate. I see the dyno run was done in third gear. The only time i had my car on a dyno in this country it was run in forth. Can they be done in any gear?
Reply
Old May 22, 2010 | 09:20 PM
  #4  
BBB3's Avatar
BBB3
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 8
From: East Anglia
Default

mine was run in fourth gear...
Reply
Old May 22, 2010 | 09:33 PM
  #5  
dynamix's Avatar
dynamix
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 9,708
Likes: 3
From: near you
Default

Nice result Ben

yeah you would see a small improvement with headers and induction but how much is pretty hard to say. Sorry I missed your call earlier - was having a bbq and enjoying some sun

Looks like 295 ish lb/ft - not bad
Reply
Old May 22, 2010 | 09:36 PM
  #6  
BBB3's Avatar
BBB3
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 8
From: East Anglia
Default

my00 made 340.3 with 295 ib/ft
Reply
Old May 22, 2010 | 10:00 PM
  #7  
Motion-Mx's Avatar
Motion-Mx
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 671
Likes: 0
From: Sheffield
Default

Hey guy's,

yeah I thought they always dyno'd in 5th but...who knows...

torque is around 285/290,as we said duncan...330/340 so we were on the money...I'm happy....as always tho,just got thoughts running around my head on what's next!

give me a call Duncan if you get a moment tomorrow please,

Thanks,
Reply
Old May 22, 2010 | 10:02 PM
  #8  
BBB3's Avatar
BBB3
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 8
From: East Anglia
Default

i would be happy aswel mate as its a nice car
Reply
Old May 22, 2010 | 10:20 PM
  #9  
dynamix's Avatar
dynamix
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 9,708
Likes: 3
From: near you
Default

Originally Posted by Motion-Mx
Hey guy's,

yeah I thought they always dyno'd in 5th but...who knows...

torque is around 285/290,as we said duncan...330/340 so we were on the money...I'm happy....as always tho,just got thoughts running around my head on what's next!

give me a call Duncan if you get a moment tomorrow please,

Thanks,
cool - am at cadwell tomorrow watching the superbikes - will give you a shout during the day sometime
Reply
Old May 23, 2010 | 07:28 AM
  #10  
Duke of Hazards's Avatar
Duke of Hazards
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Default

looks a bit lean
Reply
Old May 23, 2010 | 06:36 PM
  #11  
Motion-Mx's Avatar
Motion-Mx
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 671
Likes: 0
From: Sheffield
Default

anybody else any thoughts on the AFR?
Reply
Old May 23, 2010 | 08:04 PM
  #12  
Anders_WR1's Avatar
Anders_WR1
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 0
From: Surrey
Default

Your car will be making more power than that on the road, it might boost a bit higher if it was run in 4th gear too.

I would go straight to tubular headers with Harvey's GT spec up-pipe, they will help boost your torque and will give you head room if you ever upgrade your turbo.

Anders
Reply
Old May 23, 2010 | 08:22 PM
  #13  
Motion-Mx's Avatar
Motion-Mx
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 671
Likes: 0
From: Sheffield
Default

wow...you've got me excited...thinking about it...I know my car boost's around 21 PSI but the dyno only shows 18?

I was told to stay away from tubular headers unless going beyond 400BHP?

any thoughts on it being lean?

also...is there much point throwing mroe stuff at the car if sticking with the stock turbo (temporarily) as I thought the VF34 maxed at 340 ish?

thanks for your input
Reply
Old May 23, 2010 | 08:25 PM
  #14  
fastboyslim's Avatar
fastboyslim
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,272
Likes: 0
From: Twickenham
Default

Motion-MX, i think you and i need a MD321.
Reply
Old May 23, 2010 | 08:53 PM
  #15  
dynamix's Avatar
dynamix
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 9,708
Likes: 3
From: near you
Default

AFR's on dyno's are not always the best guide Ben as the environment is a little artificial. happy to check it out for you when i am up next but as you said it is happy and that is ultimately the main point.

headers - i have seen some good improvements in the mid 300's from fittings harvey's headers and uppipe.

And yes to the MD321
Reply
Old May 23, 2010 | 08:55 PM
  #16  
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 2
From: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Default

usually show richer than they are on the road when on the dyno..

Worth checking imho.

Simon
Reply
Old May 23, 2010 | 09:25 PM
  #17  
Anders_WR1's Avatar
Anders_WR1
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 0
From: Surrey
Default

Originally Posted by Motion-Mx
wow...you've got me excited...thinking about it...I know my car boost's around 21 PSI but the dyno only shows 18?

I was told to stay away from tubular headers unless going beyond 400BHP?

any thoughts on it being lean?

also...is there much point throwing mroe stuff at the car if sticking with the stock turbo (temporarily) as I thought the VF34 maxed at 340 ish?

thanks for your input
I was at a similar state of tune a couple of years ago with Harvey's ported headers, up-pipe and FMIC with cold air induction it made 332bhp on Powerstations rollers (some people say they show less than Dyno Dynamics).

In all honesty you probably won't see much more peak power from the VF34, it only flows so much. Adding ported headers will help spool and give you some better torque over the rev range, but if you want a big hike in power you'll need to accept big spend with MD321H or one of the new Scooby Clinic turbos, tubular headers and probably a 3" exhaust.

If you can be happy with 370-380bhp you might get away with the standard injectors and TMIC.

Anders
Reply
Old May 23, 2010 | 09:35 PM
  #18  
360ste's Avatar
360ste
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,892
Likes: 0
From: In the Flatlands of Lincolnshire
Default

My bugeye STi (not PPP) was running 360 bhp when tuned at G-Force Motorsport back in 2004. Specs were tubular headers, FMIC (inc induction kit), APS 3" exhaust with sports cat uprated fuel pump. But was running a GEMS ecu as at ther decision time Ecutek was early in development and all the info avaliable said past 400 bhp would need standalone ECU. Currently at 416 bhp at almost 100k miles, with no internal work EVER. Bought car brand new so know every job done.

Last edited by 360ste; May 23, 2010 at 09:37 PM. Reason: Vodka does nopt aid spelling. Took two attempts Hic Hioc.
Reply
Old May 23, 2010 | 10:02 PM
  #19  
fastboyslim's Avatar
fastboyslim
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,272
Likes: 0
From: Twickenham
Default

Originally Posted by 360ste
My bugeye STi (not PPP) was running 360 bhp when tuned at G-Force Motorsport back in 2004. Specs were tubular headers, FMIC (inc induction kit), APS 3" exhaust with sports cat uprated fuel pump. But was running a GEMS ecu as at ther decision time Ecutek was early in development and all the info avaliable said past 400 bhp would need standalone ECU. Currently at 416 bhp at almost 100k miles, with no internal work EVER. Bought car brand new so know every job done.

What turbo you running now fella? Was that 360 on the standard turbo?
Reply
Old May 23, 2010 | 10:04 PM
  #20  
Motion-Mx's Avatar
Motion-Mx
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 671
Likes: 0
From: Sheffield
Default

Originally Posted by fastboyslim
Motion-MX, i think you and i need a MD321.
definitely mate,you fancy lending me 1K? haha


alrighty...definitely gona grab some headers...tubular,harveys or gt spec I don't know but... headers up pipe and an RCM induction kit and map tweak pretty soon.

thanks people,
Reply
Old May 23, 2010 | 10:25 PM
  #21  
Anders_WR1's Avatar
Anders_WR1
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 0
From: Surrey
Default

Originally Posted by Motion-Mx
definitely mate,you fancy lending me 1K? haha


alrighty...definitely gona grab some headers...tubular,harveys or gt spec I don't know but... headers up pipe and an RCM induction kit and map tweak pretty soon.

thanks people,
Don't bother with the RCM induction kit unless you're fitting an FMIC, it will suck hot air from the engine bay and your TMIC will struggle.

Anders
Reply
Old May 24, 2010 | 10:22 PM
  #22  
gus sti8's Avatar
gus sti8
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 0
From: sheffield my03 sti 600ish/540ish
Default

nice fp green maybe going here made 399/390@20psi and duncan will confirm how it goes lol
Reply
Old May 25, 2010 | 07:57 PM
  #23  
Motion-Mx's Avatar
Motion-Mx
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 671
Likes: 0
From: Sheffield
Default

what intake kit should I look at then?

thanks,
Reply
Old May 25, 2010 | 08:48 PM
  #24  
eggy790's Avatar
eggy790
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,304
Likes: 0
From: n/a
Default

VF48s can be picked up cheap.. could be a cheap stop gap before you can afford a 321T ?
Reply
Old May 25, 2010 | 09:34 PM
  #25  
dynamix's Avatar
dynamix
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 9,708
Likes: 3
From: near you
Default

Originally Posted by gus sti8
nice fp green maybe going here made 399/390@20psi and duncan will confirm how it goes lol
Reply
Old May 27, 2010 | 07:09 AM
  #26  
harvey's Avatar
harvey
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,419
Likes: 1
From: Darlington
Default

If you are sticking with the same turbo or even going as far as a TD05 18G my advice is not to spend any money on induction as the air box on your STi 03 does a good job way beyond 360 bhp. If you are going to 400 bhp because of a turbo change (and injectors) then go for an RCMS induction kit which I can also do for you.
If you are sticking with your existing turbo then you are looking for more torque and ported headers and matched uppipe is the way to go. However, if you have designs on a bigger turbo and plan to go towards the 400 bracket then tubular headers with special uppipe are the way to go.
However, I would not advocate fitting the tubular headers at the 400 bracket without the special uppipe. What is quite clear is that your torque is relatively low and changing to ported headers will definately improve that situation and give good potential for more.
Reply
Old May 27, 2010 | 07:40 AM
  #27  
Alan Jeffery's Avatar
Alan Jeffery
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
From: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Default

Originally Posted by Anders_WR1
Don't bother with the RCM induction kit unless you're fitting an FMIC, it will suck hot air from the engine bay and your TMIC will struggle.

Anders
Sorry, you've lost me there. Do you mean that it won't suck hot air from the engine bay if you fit an FMIC? or do you mean that the TMIC will struggle with the RCM filter sucking all the hot air out?
Reply
Old May 27, 2010 | 07:43 AM
  #28  
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 2
From: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Jeffery
Sorry, you've lost me there. Do you mean that it won't suck hot air from the engine bay if you fit an FMIC? or do you mean that the TMIC will struggle with the RCM filter sucking all the hot air out?
you have little choice when you fit a fmic as it is difficult to retain the standard air box with fmic pipes having to pass it.

Simon
Reply
Old May 27, 2010 | 08:37 AM
  #29  
Anders_WR1's Avatar
Anders_WR1
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 0
From: Surrey
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Jeffery
Sorry, you've lost me there. Do you mean that it won't suck hot air from the engine bay if you fit an FMIC? or do you mean that the TMIC will struggle with the RCM filter sucking all the hot air out?
I mean if he's sticking with TMIC, the benefit in flow are wiped out by the increased temperature from the engine bay, especially if he retains the standard MAF set up.

If he wants 400bhp with TMIC, probably better to fit an APS CAIK in the wing, or some other wing mounted filter?

btw, I'm interested in your engine bay mounted induction kit with long skinnty K&N filter and hard pipe. How much for that set up? (I've got FMIC).

Anders
Reply
Old May 27, 2010 | 11:55 AM
  #30  
joz8968's Avatar
joz8968
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 23,764
Likes: 9
From: Leicester
Default

Originally Posted by Anders_WR1
I mean if he's sticking with TMIC, the benefit in flow are wiped out by the increased temperature from the engine bay, especially if he retains the standard MAF set up....
But the AFRs would be accounted for in the remap, regardless of what's used for induction.

Just means that he could be missing out on, maybe, 5-10bhp extra max. for the peak power figure, compared to if he had a fully enclosed airbox and air feed around the cone filter (or isolated away in the wing, as you say), and hence denser air so more fuel to burn/power to make.
Reply



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:47 AM.