Head Gasket thickness
#7
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
I wouldn't buy HGs on the basis of how cheap they are. That's flawed thinking regarding such a major, fundamental component of the engine.
You are best off with the stronger STi MLS ones, as the lesser WRX-fit composite fibre jobs actually aren't that much cheaper... if at all!
You should be looking at around £100-130 the pair, for the MLS types.
You are best off with the stronger STi MLS ones, as the lesser WRX-fit composite fibre jobs actually aren't that much cheaper... if at all!
You should be looking at around £100-130 the pair, for the MLS types.
Last edited by joz8968; 02 April 2010 at 09:28 PM.
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: South Wirral
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've looked around flea bay and, for my engine as above, found Cosworth HGs at .7mm and 1.1mm, Cometic HGs at 1.2mm and 1.3mm and other un-named makes at .55mm and 1.0mm. All in multi-layer steel, hence my confusion and a reason for the question.
I can understand why thicker ones would be used if the head is skimmed, but why would the other thicknesses be used?
I can understand why thicker ones would be used if the head is skimmed, but why would the other thicknesses be used?
#9
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
Don't know.
But if you search more, you should see the Cosworth and/or Cometic offered in 1.5mm, as well (unless they're not available at the mo ). I don't think 0.1mm/4 thou difference will be problem as regard the CR. Theoretically the 1.5mm ones will cause the CR to increase a tad (all else being equal), but don't know if it will be enough to compromise the engine?
Personally, I'd play safe and get STi v.1-4 ones from somewhere like API or RCM... that way you know they'll be the correct 1.6mm thickness....
But if you search more, you should see the Cosworth and/or Cometic offered in 1.5mm, as well (unless they're not available at the mo ). I don't think 0.1mm/4 thou difference will be problem as regard the CR. Theoretically the 1.5mm ones will cause the CR to increase a tad (all else being equal), but don't know if it will be enough to compromise the engine?
Personally, I'd play safe and get STi v.1-4 ones from somewhere like API or RCM... that way you know they'll be the correct 1.6mm thickness....
Last edited by joz8968; 02 April 2010 at 09:57 PM.
#12
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: South Wirral
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for the info Joz, much appreciated as I don't want to stress the engine with too high compression.
Still scratching my head about the other thicknesses though.
Anybody else got any ideas?
Still scratching my head about the other thicknesses though.
Anybody else got any ideas?
#13
#14
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
Doesn't say, specifically, what the thickness is for those ones ^^^.
They do do the 1.6mm ones too, though:-
http://importcarparts.co.uk/parts_in...en=&searchKey=
They do do the 1.6mm ones too, though:-
http://importcarparts.co.uk/parts_in...en=&searchKey=
Last edited by joz8968; 04 April 2010 at 12:07 AM.
#17
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
As joz said above - go for the OEM STi Version 3~4 1.6mm MLS head gaskets and you wont have any problems provided the head and deck faces are prepped correctly ( clean and flat/no distorsion). Dont use the standard carbon composite head gaskets as fitted as standard on the WRX - they tend to fail around the lower coolant areas of the head gasket.
The other thickness of head gaskets on the market are for different combinations of pistons/compression height and head volume - normally used when you have worked out your CR on a Forged build.
Mick
The other thickness of head gaskets on the market are for different combinations of pistons/compression height and head volume - normally used when you have worked out your CR on a Forged build.
Mick
#19
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
Oh sorry john, I didn't realise that you wouldn't have known that. Otherwise I would have mentioned earlier that's why there are various thicknesses.
As Mick says, it's so that you can work out the C.R. after a rebuild with aftermarket pistons/rods/heads - any combo of which could alter the C.R. - and then be able to choose an appropriate thickness, so as to restore as close to the std C.R. as possible...
As Mick says, it's so that you can work out the C.R. after a rebuild with aftermarket pistons/rods/heads - any combo of which could alter the C.R. - and then be able to choose an appropriate thickness, so as to restore as close to the std C.R. as possible...
Last edited by joz8968; 04 April 2010 at 05:38 PM.
#20
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: South Wirral
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks again Joz. I was aware of it but obviously had a brain dead period.
I have been researching some more and a main point for consideration in the calculation seems to be the compressed thickness of the gasket. As the standard 1.6mm gaskets are fibre wouldn't they compress more than the MLS ones?
The cylindrical volume created using a 1.6mm gasket is 10.64cc and, for example, a 1.3mm gasket would give 8.645cc. Using the calculation to get the CR, this reduction in compressed volume would increase the CR from 8:1 to 8.2:1.
However, if as I suspect, a fibre gasket would compress more than an MLS then would the actual difference when compressed to be minimal if using the 1.3mm MLS?
Also, are the thicker ones less prone to blowing under pressure?
Or am I trying to be too clever for my own good? - just trying to get a thorough understanding.
I have been researching some more and a main point for consideration in the calculation seems to be the compressed thickness of the gasket. As the standard 1.6mm gaskets are fibre wouldn't they compress more than the MLS ones?
The cylindrical volume created using a 1.6mm gasket is 10.64cc and, for example, a 1.3mm gasket would give 8.645cc. Using the calculation to get the CR, this reduction in compressed volume would increase the CR from 8:1 to 8.2:1.
However, if as I suspect, a fibre gasket would compress more than an MLS then would the actual difference when compressed to be minimal if using the 1.3mm MLS?
Also, are the thicker ones less prone to blowing under pressure?
Or am I trying to be too clever for my own good? - just trying to get a thorough understanding.
#21
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
Interesting point re the fibre and metal ones compressing down to different heights. Unless the fibre ones are actually thicker, so that when torqued up, they become exactly the same height as the metal ones???? Pass. You'd have to speak to a specialist to get him to explain it, etc.
The way I understand fibre v metal:-
fibre - more likely to fail under increased boost pressure. More fragile. But when they do fail they typically fail 'slowly' so can 'hold up' for longer, due to the malleable nature of the composite fibre material.
metal - much tougher. Can handle high boost pressures. But if they do fail, they tend to fail immediately , due to their unmalleable nature.
The way I understand fibre v metal:-
fibre - more likely to fail under increased boost pressure. More fragile. But when they do fail they typically fail 'slowly' so can 'hold up' for longer, due to the malleable nature of the composite fibre material.
metal - much tougher. Can handle high boost pressures. But if they do fail, they tend to fail immediately , due to their unmalleable nature.
Last edited by joz8968; 05 April 2010 at 11:03 AM.
#22
Scooby Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: high wycombe
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#23
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: South Wirral
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That must be 51 thou (0.051") which works out at about 1.3mm, right?
Cometic MLS at that size are £89.95 delivered on ebay - is that a good price?
Thanks for the info, much appreciated
Cometic MLS at that size are £89.95 delivered on ebay - is that a good price?
Thanks for the info, much appreciated
#24
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
Anything under £100 for a pair of metal multi layer jobs is a great price.
I'd double check with API David re HG thickness for your MY. As said, I thought it was 1.6mm...and if it IS, but you fit 1.3mm ones instead, then obviously the CR will be raised somewhat. As said, best to get the 'all clear' from a well known specilaist, befor diving in...
I'd double check with API David re HG thickness for your MY. As said, I thought it was 1.6mm...and if it IS, but you fit 1.3mm ones instead, then obviously the CR will be raised somewhat. As said, best to get the 'all clear' from a well known specilaist, befor diving in...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post