Notices
General Technical
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

remap info

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 5, 2009 | 09:19 PM
  #1  
s c o o b y's Avatar
s c o o b y
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 304
Likes: 1
From: skeg vagas
Wink remap info

hi

when i remap my uk turbo my99 to 280bhp would it be about the same performance as the uk sti . was just wondering if anyone has any info on this

thanks
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2009 | 09:24 PM
  #2  
99greenwagon's Avatar
99greenwagon
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,870
Likes: 0
Default

depends what torque figure u get!
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2009 | 09:48 PM
  #3  
s c o o b y's Avatar
s c o o b y
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 304
Likes: 1
From: skeg vagas
Default

whats good and whats bad then
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2009 | 09:55 PM
  #4  
99greenwagon's Avatar
99greenwagon
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,870
Likes: 0
Default

280lbft would be nice,200lb ft,not as nice!
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2009 | 10:10 PM
  #5  
Slowboy Racing's Avatar
Slowboy Racing
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,658
Likes: 0
From: 10.68 QT mile in 2007 2.33 Type R ** Current 2002 Spec C 2.33 Track prepped.
Default

STI will be lighter, have a beter cam, turbo, head combo etc etc. Like for like on boost.

In a word No
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2009 | 10:13 PM
  #6  
s c o o b y's Avatar
s c o o b y
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 304
Likes: 1
From: skeg vagas
Default

is it actually worth the cost then , whats your apinion . i dont no as only driven standard ones before.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2009 | 10:20 PM
  #7  
99greenwagon's Avatar
99greenwagon
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,870
Likes: 0
Default

my 99 uk turbowagon has 240bhp with 280lbft and i can keep with 03 uksti standard.,now wait for everyone to shoot me down.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2009 | 10:25 PM
  #8  
stigaz's Avatar
stigaz
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
From: dundee
Default

what mods have you done to get 280 after a remap?
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2009 | 10:25 PM
  #9  
s c o o b y's Avatar
s c o o b y
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 304
Likes: 1
From: skeg vagas
Default

i use two no a couple of lads one had a 96 reg uk turbo remapped and the other had a classic type ra and they both said they thought the 96 turbo was quicker.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2009 | 10:26 PM
  #10  
s c o o b y's Avatar
s c o o b y
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 304
Likes: 1
From: skeg vagas
Default

full decat and filter . not had it done yet just what i been told
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2009 | 10:31 PM
  #11  
99greenwagon's Avatar
99greenwagon
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,870
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by stigaz
what mods have you done to get 280 after a remap?
ninja sports cat downpipe,magnex mid section,h&s backbox,sti 5 tmic,mapped by martyn at engine tuner with ecutek 3,running on standard td04 mate.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2009 | 11:00 PM
  #12  
s c o o b y's Avatar
s c o o b y
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 304
Likes: 1
From: skeg vagas
Default

how come you only got 240bhp with a remap ?
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2009 | 01:00 PM
  #13  
BLACK V5's Avatar
BLACK V5
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 0
From: Bath
Default

Originally Posted by Slowboy Racing
STI will be lighter, have a beter cam, turbo, head combo etc etc. Like for like on boost.

In a word No
How would a uk sti be lighter than than a classic turbo? Your talking bugeye onwards for a uk sti.. And all impreza`s since then have just got more and more heavy.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2009 | 05:23 PM
  #14  
99greenwagon's Avatar
99greenwagon
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,870
Likes: 0
Default

i agree, they r gettin heavier,and the reason i only got 240 bhp,was down to half worn plugs,dodgy knock sensor,and my td04 that had done 135k!,looking to put on vf35 with walbro 2 sort it!
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2009 | 07:13 PM
  #15  
pat's Avatar
pat
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 679
Likes: 0
Default

Your talking bugeye onwards for a uk sti..
One COULD argue that a P1 was a UK STI
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2009 | 07:52 PM
  #16  
99greenwagon's Avatar
99greenwagon
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,870
Likes: 0
Default

how is that relevant?
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2009 | 08:41 PM
  #17  
s c o o b y's Avatar
s c o o b y
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 304
Likes: 1
From: skeg vagas
Default

Originally Posted by pat
One COULD argue that a P1 was a UK STI
well the newage arnt as quick with 280 bhp, the classics are lighter oh and the best
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2009 | 09:43 PM
  #18  
pat's Avatar
pat
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 679
Likes: 0
Default

Perhaps I didn't word that right...

At the time that the OP's car was on sale in the UK, there was also another Impreza on sale, which featured an STi engine, it was called a P1. Although a lot of stuff was removed from the STi V Type R to turn it into a P1, it is still technically an STi, and so one could argue that there WAS a classic STi Type UK.

If you want to be ultra pedantic you could also assert that the 22B Type UK cars were also official UK classic STi cars....

Up against either, a UK Turbo 2000 pushing 280 would have a hard time, and against a mapped P1 or 22B, little chance.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2009 | 10:20 PM
  #19  
99greenwagon's Avatar
99greenwagon
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,870
Likes: 0
Default

fair comment but there is some seriously quick uk turbos about!all depends on mods etc,back to the original question,i personally think that a 280/280 uk classic turbo will be good for matching if not bettering a standard newage uk sti!
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2009 | 10:44 PM
  #20  
Slowboy Racing's Avatar
Slowboy Racing
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,658
Likes: 0
From: 10.68 QT mile in 2007 2.33 Type R ** Current 2002 Spec C 2.33 Track prepped.
Default

Originally Posted by BLACK V5
How would a uk sti be lighter than than a classic turbo? Your talking bugeye onwards for a uk sti.. And all impreza`s since then have just got more and more heavy.
As said in my post like for like, this would assume two classics in this instance.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2009 | 11:01 PM
  #21  
s c o o b y's Avatar
s c o o b y
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 304
Likes: 1
From: skeg vagas
Default

just to set the record how much heavier is the new age than a classic does anyone actually no the figures

thanks for the info guys
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2009 | 11:03 PM
  #22  
joz8968's Avatar
joz8968
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 23,764
Likes: 9
From: Leicester
Default

Originally Posted by Slowboy Racing
Originally Posted by BLACK V5
Originally Posted by Slowboy Racing
STI will be lighter, have a beter cam, turbo, head combo etc etc. Like for like on boost.

In a word No
How would a uk sti be lighter than than a classic turbo? Your talking bugeye onwards for a uk sti.. And all impreza`s since then have just got more and more heavy.
As said in my post like for like, this would assume two classics in this instance.

I think what BLACK V5 is saying is that - BY DEFINITION - the only UK "STi" is from the New Age Bugeye onwards (therefore heavier, etc.). The OP has caused a bit of confusion by mentioning "UK STi" of which, officially, there was NO such badged Classic.

But as Pat says, unofficially, one could regard the 22B Type UK and P1 as the UK's Classic 'STi's'...

Last edited by joz8968; Mar 6, 2009 at 11:42 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2009 | 11:13 PM
  #23  
joz8968's Avatar
joz8968
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 23,764
Likes: 9
From: Leicester
Default

Originally Posted by s c o o b y
just to set the record how much heavier is the new age than a classic does anyone actually no the figures

thanks for the info guys
Assumimg we're just concentrating a 4-door saloons, then:-

UK/Eur Bugeye v.7/Blobeye v.8 WRX - 1385kg dry
UK/Eur Bugeye v.7/Blobeye v.8 STi - 1470kg dry

Your UK car is 1235kg dry, so is a whopping 160kg lighter than the New Age WRX (like carrying two 12.5st blokes around in your car!)... And a positively gargantuan 235kg less than the STi (three blokes!!! lol).

(add about 20kg for all fluids)

Last edited by joz8968; Mar 6, 2009 at 11:30 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2009 | 11:23 PM
  #24  
s c o o b y's Avatar
s c o o b y
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 304
Likes: 1
From: skeg vagas
Default

what about the classic is that 1385

thanks
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2009 | 11:49 PM
  #25  
joz8968's Avatar
joz8968
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 23,764
Likes: 9
From: Leicester
Default

(Still talking saloons only...)

No. Your Classic UK car is 1235kg dry.

The heaviest Jap Classics topped out at 'only' 1300kg dry (MY99/00 v.5/6 4-door STi). The lightest ever Classic was the MY93 first Jap WRX Type RA at a paltry 1170kg dry.

The UK New Age cars kicked off at 1385kg dry (WRX v.7).

Last edited by joz8968; Mar 6, 2009 at 11:55 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2009 | 12:49 PM
  #26  
s c o o b y's Avatar
s c o o b y
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 304
Likes: 1
From: skeg vagas
Default

thanks for that bud . hope the cars good when it comes back from zen thats who will be doing my remap when the old girl comes out on the 1st of may. cant wait !!!!! i just bring her out in the summer.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2009 | 01:20 PM
  #27  
TonyBurns's Avatar
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 2
From: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Default

Oh here we go again with the "classic is faster than newage" debate so i shall end it now

1. a UK car with 280bhp WONT be as quick as a new age STI with similar power due to GEAR RATIO's.

2. The quickest production car that subaru have produced is a new age car, it was 2 SECONDS quicker than its replacement to 100mph with a similar p2w ratio.

3. You cannot compare a 280bhp car against a 265bhp car

Tony
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2009 | 01:41 PM
  #28  
s c o o b y's Avatar
s c o o b y
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 304
Likes: 1
From: skeg vagas
Default

yes but you put the same engine and box in a classic and it still will be quicker hence the weight lol. only kidding just was wondering that was all bud .
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2009 | 02:04 PM
  #29  
TonyBurns's Avatar
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 2
From: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Default

Originally Posted by s c o o b y
yes but you put the same engine and box in a classic and it still will be quicker hence the weight lol. only kidding just was wondering that was all bud .

Those 6 speeders add about 70kg to the weight of a classic you know?
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2009 | 02:23 PM
  #30  
ZEN Performance's Avatar
ZEN Performance
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,859
Likes: 0
From: Wellingborough, Northamptonshire
Default

30kg
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KAS35RSTI
Subaru
27
Nov 4, 2021 07:12 PM
bluebullet29
General Technical
9
Oct 5, 2015 02:17 PM
yabbadoo4
ScoobyNet General
11
Sep 30, 2015 10:33 PM
IanG1983
Subaru Parts
1
Sep 30, 2015 04:52 PM
slimwiltaz
General Technical
4
Sep 25, 2015 10:22 PM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:02 PM.