Notices
General Technical
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

321h how much torque?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 1, 2008 | 10:04 PM
  #1  
sti.dean's Avatar
sti.dean
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 138
Likes: 7
Default 321h how much torque?

had my car at rr today 2.0 sti7 with md 321h + all supporting mods made 384bhp but only 325 lbs torque. what torque figures are other 321h owners seeing on a 2.0 as i thought this seemed a little low .
thanks dean.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2008 | 10:56 PM
  #2  
bonzee's Avatar
bonzee
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,201
Likes: 0
From: knocking on the door of 400bhp with v power smashed through it with e85
Default

Originally Posted by sti.dean
had my car at rr today 2.0 sti7 with md 321h + all supporting mods made 384bhp but only 325 lbs torque. what torque figures are other 321h owners seeing on a 2.0 as i thought this seemed a little low .
thanks dean.
hi mate i have the 321h on mine took mine for r/r last week made 377bhp with 341torque l i wasn't happy thought i would be nearer the 390bhp with a little less torque,with my mods on a 2.0 sti8 but as i've been told figures aren't everything it's driveability. but still not happy
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2008 | 11:34 PM
  #3  
samcowrx's Avatar
samcowrx
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,281
Likes: 0
From: Oxford- the shire
Default

sti dean, you say all supporting mods?, what have you done?, and what rr is that from?, the torque does seem a little low, but how does the car drive?, thats the main thing.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2008 | 12:01 AM
  #4  
bigarf's Avatar
bigarf
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (67)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,061
Likes: 0
From: w,yorkshire
Default

Originally Posted by sti.dean
had my car at rr today 2.0 sti7 with md 321h + all supporting mods made 384bhp but only 325 lbs torque. what torque figures are other 321h owners seeing on a 2.0 as i thought this seemed a little low .
thanks dean.
almost identical figure of what mine produced when i was on the 321h.i got 383bhp and 320 torque,some get more torque but some dont it could be the way the dyno is opperated.if the car drives ok i shouldnt worry.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2008 | 10:47 AM
  #5  
MartynJ's Avatar
MartynJ
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,629
Likes: 3
From: Enginetuner Plymouth for 4wd RR Mapping Apexi Ecutek Alcatek Proper Garage More than just a laptop!
Default

What boost level are you running it at in the midrange and topend ?
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2008 | 11:28 AM
  #6  
Lateral Performance's Avatar
Lateral Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,150
Likes: 0
From: 8.95 @ 168mph. Zero to 1KM 194.1mph
Default

Guys, it's unusual for a turbo that spools up early, to make low torque, if anything, the opposite is true. Circa 375ftlbs isn't uncommon on a car making around 400bhp.

It would be very helpful to see the graphs, with the boost profile.

How do they actually feel on the road at circa 3500rpm ?


Mark.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2008 | 11:36 AM
  #7  
sti.dean's Avatar
sti.dean
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 138
Likes: 7
Default



supporting mods are md321h,gt spec headers,3" exhaust system with sports cat in 2nd cat position,650cc injectors, 255 pump, big cone filter,samco induction pipe,simtec ecu.

Last edited by sti.dean; Nov 2, 2008 at 03:42 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2008 | 11:46 AM
  #8  
IRC450STI's Avatar
IRC450STI
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
Default

I had the MD321H and it made 400BHP 380ftlbs on a 2ltr with surporting mods etc.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2008 | 02:02 PM
  #9  
Power Junkie's Avatar
Power Junkie
Scooby Regular
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,585
Likes: 6
From: Aberdeen
Default

I am now around 415bhp with about 360ftlb will lost of supporting mods.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2008 | 02:23 PM
  #10  
JimmyBFC's Avatar
JimmyBFC
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 0
From: Barnsley
Default

Torque is everything, much more impressive than plain old bhp.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2008 | 02:47 PM
  #11  
silent running's Avatar
silent running
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 1
From: East coast.
Default

Originally Posted by JimmyBFC
Torque is everything, much more impressive than plain old bhp.
LOL if torque is 'everything' then why not just get a turbodiesel?
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2008 | 03:13 PM
  #12  
Lateral Performance's Avatar
Lateral Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,150
Likes: 0
From: 8.95 @ 168mph. Zero to 1KM 194.1mph
Default

Dean,

It doesn't help that the car was run in 3rd gear, especially on a 6 speed box. This means that whilst it's safer, and less stress on the engine, it's hard to get much load to spool the turbo up.

The graph shows peak boost at 4200rpm, I'm sure much later than you would generally get it on the road. At least I would certainly expect you to get it much earlier on the H.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2008 | 03:52 PM
  #13  
sti.dean's Avatar
sti.dean
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 138
Likes: 7
Default

if the car had been run in 5th would it have made much difference to bhp a torque?
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2008 | 04:05 PM
  #14  
JimmyBFC's Avatar
JimmyBFC
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 0
From: Barnsley
Default

Originally Posted by silent running
LOL if torque is 'everything' then why not just get a turbodiesel?
Because I have enough for now with 400lbs/ft
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2008 | 04:07 PM
  #15  
JimmyBFC's Avatar
JimmyBFC
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 0
From: Barnsley
Default

Originally Posted by Lateral Performance
Dean,

It doesn't help that the car was run in 3rd gear, especially on a 6 speed box. This means that whilst it's safer, and less stress on the engine, it's hard to get much load to spool the turbo up.

The graph shows peak boost at 4200rpm, I'm sure much later than you would generally get it on the road. At least I would certainly expect you to get it much earlier on the H.
I thought all 6 speeds are normally run in 4th on the dyno too....oh dear, scoobyclinic do it again

Why would they do it in 3rd, is there a reason?
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2008 | 04:14 PM
  #16  
lunar tick's Avatar
lunar tick
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 815
Likes: 2
From: Northumberland
Default

Originally Posted by sti.dean
had my car at rr today 2.0 sti7 with md 321h + all supporting mods made 384bhp but only 325 lbs torque. what torque figures are other 321h owners seeing on a 2.0 as i thought this seemed a little low .
thanks dean.
I'm running a very similar spec to yours and it's going on the dyno on Wednesday (Zen's rollers which are apparently quite conservative) so I'll let you know how I get on
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2008 | 04:17 PM
  #17  
dunx's Avatar
dunx
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
From: Slowly rebuilding the kit of bits into a car...
Default

No roller info for mine, but deffo late 4000's to reach maximum boost !

Yes, it does need a re-re-map so hope that helps.

MD321H, Lateral headers, catted TSL 2.5/3" exhaust.

DunxC
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2008 | 04:28 PM
  #18  
Lateral Performance's Avatar
Lateral Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,150
Likes: 0
From: 8.95 @ 168mph. Zero to 1KM 194.1mph
Default

Originally Posted by sti.dean
if the car had been run in 5th would it have made much difference to bhp a torque?
It would have little effect on BHP, but running two gears higher would greatly effect the torque.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2008 | 06:46 PM
  #19  
wrx9181's Avatar
wrx9181
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,160
Likes: 3
From: South Yorkshire
Default

doesnt loads of torque kill the gear box anyway
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2008 | 08:32 PM
  #20  
bigarf's Avatar
bigarf
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (67)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,061
Likes: 0
From: w,yorkshire
Default

Originally Posted by wrx9181
doesnt loads of torque kill the gear box anyway
not on the 6 speed it dont.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2008 | 09:52 PM
  #21  
dynamix's Avatar
dynamix
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 9,708
Likes: 3
From: near you
Default

Originally Posted by dunx
No roller info for mine, but deffo late 4000's to reach maximum boost !

Yes, it does need a re-re-map so hope that helps.

MD321H, Lateral headers, catted TSL 2.5/3" exhaust.

DunxC
Have you got an exhaust/uppipe leak ?
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2008 | 10:01 PM
  #22  
Lateral Performance's Avatar
Lateral Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,150
Likes: 0
From: 8.95 @ 168mph. Zero to 1KM 194.1mph
Default

Duncan,

When you say it needs a re-map, has it been mapped since the H was fitted ? Late 4k rpm is just plain wrong.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2008 | 05:57 AM
  #23  
_Meridian_'s Avatar
_Meridian_
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,806
Likes: 1
From: Mancs
Default

Originally Posted by lunar tick
(Zen's rollers which are apparently quite conservative)

On theirs I get 372bhp and 356lbft.


lunar tick

What have you had done this time?


M
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2008 | 09:51 AM
  #24  
lunar tick's Avatar
lunar tick
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 815
Likes: 2
From: Northumberland
Default

Originally Posted by _Meridian_
On theirs I get 372bhp and 356lbft.


lunar tick

What have you had done this time?


M
Hi M

Having some gauges and engine mounts fitted. Paul is going to tweek the map while I'm there but the main thing is to get it on the RR and see exactly where we're at with power/torque
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2008 | 04:59 PM
  #25  
stevie1982's Avatar
stevie1982
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,023
Likes: 0
Default

any more pointers on this guys, was looking to go with the md321h on my pq in the new year just getting the last few supporting mods first. how does this compare to the vf28 in driving charteristics
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2008 | 05:09 PM
  #26  
dannytwo's Avatar
dannytwo
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
From: where ever i lay my hat
Default

mine runs at 395bhp but more importantly 430torque.
it is a 2.5 tho
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2008 | 05:14 PM
  #27  
stevie1982's Avatar
stevie1982
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,023
Likes: 0
Default

what ''SHOULD'' these make on a 2.0ltr (p1) with the correct supporting mods, fmic, injectors, induction, fuel pump, headers re-map etc
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2008 | 06:55 PM
  #28  
dunx's Avatar
dunx
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
From: Slowly rebuilding the kit of bits into a car...
Default Nope !

Yes, correct, it needs a re-map, but after recently adding an oil pressure gauge, the future looks forged....

Grumpy Dunx
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2008 | 08:35 PM
  #29  
JimmyBFC's Avatar
JimmyBFC
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 0
From: Barnsley
Default

Originally Posted by wrx9181
doesnt loads of torque kill the gear box anyway
Its more stressful on the clutch if abused hard
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2008 | 08:38 PM
  #30  
JimmyBFC's Avatar
JimmyBFC
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 0
From: Barnsley
Default

Originally Posted by dunx
Yes, correct, it needs a re-map, but after recently adding an oil pressure gauge, the future looks forged....

Grumpy Dunx

Forged is the way to go, im having drop in rod conversion, nice big fat turbo kit, uprated injectors and a nice 500/550bhp/450lbs hopefully
Reply



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:04 PM.