Notices

My thoughts on 2.5 classics

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09 October 2008, 11:41 AM
  #1  
StickyMicky
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
StickyMicky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Zed Ess Won Hay Tee
Posts: 21,611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default My thoughts on 2.5 classics

they are fackin brilliant


60 miles now done and only a 4krpm limit, but its awesome

going for a long drive after work at 2.30pm
Old 09 October 2008, 11:43 AM
  #2  
Peanuts
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (15)
 
Peanuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 8,606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

if you can work the heads and do the valve train some justice then yes, I agree.
If you bolt standard heads on then no, you are wrong.
They are big hulking lazy engines and they compensate very well for poor quality driving due to the increased torque.
Old 09 October 2008, 11:49 AM
  #3  
StickyMicky
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
StickyMicky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Zed Ess Won Hay Tee
Posts: 21,611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

bugger the heads, i simply can not remember the last time i ever took my car over 5.5k on the road, the last time i ever did was probably at elvington about 5 years ago


i always wanted the low down stuff, and actually prefered driving my car the most "around the doors" when the vf22 blew up and i fitted a td04 as a stop gap

besides, the hulk is baddass
Old 09 October 2008, 12:00 PM
  #4  
Peanuts
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (15)
 
Peanuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 8,606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

good man
Old 09 October 2008, 12:38 PM
  #5  
triplesix
Scooby Regular
 
triplesix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My standard STI V valve train seems to cope OK. (452bhp) It also revved very well indeed for a stock EJ257 bottom end.

I'm sure the closed deck 2.5 rotated GT30R engine I'm building now will reach the limit of these heads though.
Old 09 October 2008, 12:41 PM
  #6  
scoobysmiff
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
scoobysmiff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: I want a Spec C!
Posts: 1,897
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[quote=Peanuts;8187285]if you can work the heads and do the valve train some justice then yes, I agree.

If you bolt standard heads on then no, you are wrong.

Can you please expand on the 2 above statements? I am building a 2.5 into my V4 Sti and would like to know everything i can before i get started
Old 09 October 2008, 12:52 PM
  #7  
StickyMicky
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
StickyMicky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Zed Ess Won Hay Tee
Posts: 21,611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

stock heads can be "bored out" or machined to make them the same size as the 2.5 bores

if you don't do this, you need a fatter head gasket, the general rule is, if you want to rev the knackers of your 2.5 then its best to sort the heads.

personally i did not, i don't want to scream the engine, i just wanted a less laggy drive.

1 bar of boost by 2800 is fine by me
Old 09 October 2008, 01:10 PM
  #8  
bighead
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
bighead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,033
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

no Peanuts is right (apply on the 2 litres as well ), ports the heads will give you a very smooth engine that will rev!!
I had mine ported on my forged 2.5 and its revs better than my old P1 2.0

ps........... stickymicky its is great with all that torque low down, but after a while you get use to the power and you will wants more !!!

Last edited by bighead; 09 October 2008 at 11:25 PM.
Old 09 October 2008, 01:19 PM
  #9  
triplesix
Scooby Regular
 
triplesix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Some sweeping statements there.

I threw together a stock EJ257 with some standard STI 5 heads and put a rotated GT30R into the equation for good measure.

The heads weren't touched (just re shimmed) I used a 1.6mm head gasket.

It made 452 bhp @ 1.4bar and revved to 8k no problem.

It was not a lazy engine and was every bit as punchy as my 360bhp 2.0L was.

I think saying that 2.5's can't rev is nonsense.
I think it's all to do with what else is bolted onto it.

I'd imagine people that use standard UK heads with over bucket shims are the ones saying the engine doesn't rev well.

Mine does and the heads were completely and utterly standard albeit STI 5 items.

I'm now building the proper engine now. It's a closed deck sleeved 2.5 with RCMS wrc rods and Omega Pistons. We'll see how standard heads (now with stronger springs) cope with 2bar from the Rotated GT30R (0.82)

Last edited by triplesix; 09 October 2008 at 01:25 PM.
Old 09 October 2008, 01:41 PM
  #10  
Peanuts
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (15)
 
Peanuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 8,606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

triplesix, dont confuse power with efficiency
Old 09 October 2008, 05:02 PM
  #11  
triplesix
Scooby Regular
 
triplesix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Peanuts its Daz (serving an infraction ban )

We're discussing what a 2.5 revs like not its efficiency.
452bhp a 1.4bar I would say is a fairly good result.
What i'm disputing is people saying that 2.5 engines don't rev. Speaking from my own personal experience I think that's rubbish. I think its the quality of the build and the parts used to bolt onto the 2.5 that make the difference.

As stated I used a stock EJ257 bottom end STI 5 heads and a GT30R

I bounced off the limiter with it numerous times and it still delivered power right upto the redline.
Old 09 October 2008, 05:51 PM
  #12  
turboDean
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
turboDean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: South Wales, Scoobless, Type R is gone!
Posts: 3,618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

agree 2.5's rev just fine, i've got STI 5 heads on mine, only worked done is the bores opened to match the block.
Took a mate out in it who wanted to build a 2.35 (coz 2.5's don't rev) he's now bought a 2.5
Old 09 October 2008, 06:19 PM
  #13  
stevebt
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
stevebt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,732
Received 33 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

What do you mean don't rev ??? I can take mine right up to the 8k limiter on my car with my tiddly turbo
Old 09 October 2008, 08:09 PM
  #14  
l70byb.
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
l70byb.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Crawley
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Mine seems to be abit lazy when revving . But i've only got a 18g fitted and pre96 wrx head that have been gasflowed .Which i've been told the heads can struggle on a 2.5 at higher rev's. Has anyone suffered from this ?
Old 09 October 2008, 08:27 PM
  #15  
StickyMicky
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
StickyMicky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Zed Ess Won Hay Tee
Posts: 21,611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stevebt
What do you mean don't rev ??? I can take mine right up to the 8k limiter on my car with my tiddly turbo

you don't have a tiddly little turbo,

i have a tiddly little turbo

ported 16g

its boosting as soon as i pull away, i love it mighy get bored with it tho once i raise the rev limit over 4k, will have to see lol
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
The Joshua Tree
Computer & Technology Related
30
28 September 2015 02:43 PM
alex_00s
Drivetrain
2
26 September 2015 06:07 PM
Nick_Cat
Computer & Technology Related
2
26 September 2015 08:00 AM
M4RKG
Wanted
4
25 September 2015 09:54 PM
S600HBY
Subaru Parts
0
25 September 2015 09:46 AM



Quick Reply: My thoughts on 2.5 classics



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:01 PM.