youre opinions on a strange rolling road result!
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: leics
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
youre opinions on a strange rolling road result!
Hi guys
Just wanted youre opinions on my rolling road result today.
1996 Impreza wrx import with scoobyworld afterburner back box and middle section decat. simota panel filter and walbro fuel pump. the rest is totally standerd.
It made 254 bhp and 303 torque!
Now im happy with the car and it feels quick but i cant help being slightley dissapointed as the car should have 260bhp standerd.
He said the car is running really well but mentioned scooby owners always get6 dissapointed when they go on the rollers
So what do you lot think? does this sound ok? could it of lost that much power over the years?
thanks guys
Just wanted youre opinions on my rolling road result today.
1996 Impreza wrx import with scoobyworld afterburner back box and middle section decat. simota panel filter and walbro fuel pump. the rest is totally standerd.
It made 254 bhp and 303 torque!
Now im happy with the car and it feels quick but i cant help being slightley dissapointed as the car should have 260bhp standerd.
He said the car is running really well but mentioned scooby owners always get6 dissapointed when they go on the rollers
So what do you lot think? does this sound ok? could it of lost that much power over the years?
thanks guys
#4
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Nr Grimsby
Posts: 2,641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi guys
Just wanted youre opinions on my rolling road result today.
1996 Impreza wrx import with scoobyworld afterburner back box and middle section decat. simota panel filter and walbro fuel pump. the rest is totally standerd.
It made 254 bhp and 303 torque!
Now im happy with the car and it feels quick but i cant help being slightley dissapointed as the car should have 260bhp standerd.
He said the car is running really well but mentioned scooby owners always get6 dissapointed when they go on the rollers
So what do you lot think? does this sound ok? could it of lost that much power over the years?
thanks guys
Just wanted youre opinions on my rolling road result today.
1996 Impreza wrx import with scoobyworld afterburner back box and middle section decat. simota panel filter and walbro fuel pump. the rest is totally standerd.
It made 254 bhp and 303 torque!
Now im happy with the car and it feels quick but i cant help being slightley dissapointed as the car should have 260bhp standerd.
He said the car is running really well but mentioned scooby owners always get6 dissapointed when they go on the rollers
So what do you lot think? does this sound ok? could it of lost that much power over the years?
thanks guys
rolling roads are not too accurate anyway you would get a variation from one day to another. (tyre pressures, temps, etc etc)
#6
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: leics
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi no it hasnt been remapped i wasnt expecting any big gains as its only the middle section and backbox but to be told its running less than standard just made me worry a bit!
i understand the fuel over here is lower octane but i thought the exhaust would at least make up for that.
i understand the fuel over here is lower octane but i thought the exhaust would at least make up for that.
Trending Topics
#9
254 bhp and 303 lbs.ft torque sounds very suspect to me. I think the rolling road has given you wrong information. Were there other Scoobs on the rollers in the same session. What figures did they get? A 2 litre WRX doing 250 brake is usually around 225 torque and a 2 litre Scoob never has more torqe than brake.
#10
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Nr Grimsby
Posts: 2,641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dont get hung up on figures, my 95wrx has been heads up agaist a fair bit std apart from 3" exhaust.
Against a 98 wrx sti I pulled away, dont know why he should have an extra 20ps on me, both where giving it our all. lol
Against a Evo 320 We were head to head up to 120mph then he pulled away, dont get it tbh.
Maybe mine is just a good one strange eh, never seen a roller either kinda curious though.
Against a 98 wrx sti I pulled away, dont know why he should have an extra 20ps on me, both where giving it our all. lol
Against a Evo 320 We were head to head up to 120mph then he pulled away, dont get it tbh.
Maybe mine is just a good one strange eh, never seen a roller either kinda curious though.
#13
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: leics
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ive got the graph here .
engine power 253.9 bhp
wheel power 166.9 bhp
drag power 87.0 bhp
max power at 6355 rpm
torque 303.3 nm
max torque at 5650 rpm
max. attained rpm 6420 rpm
my freind took his type r which hes spent ££££'s on remap exhaust etc but he only made 287 bhp and his torque was 370 ish??
engine power 253.9 bhp
wheel power 166.9 bhp
drag power 87.0 bhp
max power at 6355 rpm
torque 303.3 nm
max torque at 5650 rpm
max. attained rpm 6420 rpm
my freind took his type r which hes spent ££££'s on remap exhaust etc but he only made 287 bhp and his torque was 370 ish??
#16
Scooby Senior
Rolling roads are great for bragging rights, i remember my standard series mcrae doing 290 bhp with a split hose
At the end of the day its how it transfers to the road, if its fast you dont need the rollers to tell you that.
At the end of the day its how it transfers to the road, if its fast you dont need the rollers to tell you that.
#18
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: South Bucks
Posts: 3,213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
254 bhp and 303 lbs.ft torque sounds very suspect to me. I think the rolling road has given you wrong information. Were there other Scoobs on the rollers in the same session. What figures did they get? A 2 litre WRX doing 250 brake is usually around 225 torque and a 2 litre Scoob never has more torqe than brake.
Anything STI, I think you're right. The engine's are set to produce their power higher in the rev range and rev higher.
All refers to 2.0 litre. 2.5 is another ball game.
J.
#19
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Central Scotland
Posts: 3,687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car won't do much more than standard without a remap. By modding without mapping you've probably made it nothing but noisier and more likely to go bang.
I'd have though no cats would = potential boost spikes. the filter does nothing for you and the ecu probably hasn't got a clue about the fuel pump so it will be operating as standard.
Have a look at getting it mapped. Otherwise i'd be quite impressed with the results losing 3bhp in 12 years!
5t.
I'd have though no cats would = potential boost spikes. the filter does nothing for you and the ecu probably hasn't got a clue about the fuel pump so it will be operating as standard.
Have a look at getting it mapped. Otherwise i'd be quite impressed with the results losing 3bhp in 12 years!
5t.
#20
Now for the voice of reason!
Scooby's are not just about BHP, but also legendary for their handling and for the big grin they put on your face every time you get behind the wheel. A standard car can be mental if the driver knows what they are doing.
Why waste time and money looking for 5 or 10 extra horsepower when the cars are already fast enough anyway! Just tell people it is 300BHP and they will believe you BECAUSE IT IS A SCOOBY!!!!
Scooby's are not just about BHP, but also legendary for their handling and for the big grin they put on your face every time you get behind the wheel. A standard car can be mental if the driver knows what they are doing.
Why waste time and money looking for 5 or 10 extra horsepower when the cars are already fast enough anyway! Just tell people it is 300BHP and they will believe you BECAUSE IT IS A SCOOBY!!!!
#22
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: leics
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for youre input guys! im happy with the car and to be honest not to botherd about figres i was just concernd incase there was something wrong.
reading what youve said im actually quite happy.
I do plan on a few tweeks to come but cant really fund the remap route maybe one of them polar performance chips.
It was weird because the first time he rolled it it made 243bhp and the guy thought it seemed low so the next run he got someone to spray water on the intercooler while it was roleing on it made 254bhp. i now it must of lowerd the inlet temp but i havent got water spray on the car so whats that all about?
c
reading what youve said im actually quite happy.
I do plan on a few tweeks to come but cant really fund the remap route maybe one of them polar performance chips.
It was weird because the first time he rolled it it made 243bhp and the guy thought it seemed low so the next run he got someone to spray water on the intercooler while it was roleing on it made 254bhp. i now it must of lowerd the inlet temp but i havent got water spray on the car so whats that all about?
c
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fatboy_coach
General Technical
15
18 June 2016 03:48 PM