Notices

emissions test results! help explaine please!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01 June 2007, 06:14 PM
  #1  
jap-sti-555
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
jap-sti-555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default emissions test results! help explaine please!!

hi had emissions done and results are as follows, if anybody can shed some light to what my problem is it would be fantastic. thanks in advance to all of you!.....

fast idle test
co 3.71 %
hc 120 ppm
lambda 0.91

second fast idle
co 4.62%
hc 150 ppm
lambda 0.88

natural idle test
co 7.18 %

failed test uite bad, any ideas to resolve??
Old 01 June 2007, 06:35 PM
  #2  
Brit_in_Japan
Scooby Regular
 
Brit_in_Japan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: No longer Japan !
Posts: 1,742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jap-sti-555
hi had emissions done and results are as follows, if anybody can shed some light to what my problem is it would be fantastic. thanks in advance to all of you!.....

fast idle test
co 3.71 %
hc 120 ppm
lambda 0.91

second fast idle
co 4.62%
hc 150 ppm
lambda 0.88

natural idle test
co 7.18 %

failed test uite bad, any ideas to resolve??
Your CO emissions are much too high. IIRC lambda should be between 0.97 and 1.03, so it looks like your lambda sensor is duff which means you are getting too much CO.

Replacing your lambda sensor would be a good first step!
Old 01 June 2007, 06:38 PM
  #3  
jap-sti-555
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
jap-sti-555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

thanks for the advice, where is the location of the lambds sensor? never had to change befor.
Old 01 June 2007, 06:42 PM
  #4  
AndyLyman
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
AndyLyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Buckinghamshire
Posts: 653
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think there are 2 sensors mate...

1 is at the front on the manifold as is very expensive... just had my new one fitted at a cost of £350 on my 02 UK Sti...

The 2nd is in the centre pipe of you exhaust...

hope this is of some help...

Andy
Old 01 June 2007, 06:54 PM
  #5  
scuba_doo
Scooby Regular
 
scuba_doo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Carmarthenshire
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jap-sti-555
hi had emissions done and results are as follows, if anybody can shed some light to what my problem is it would be fantastic. thanks in advance to all of you!.....

fast idle test
co 3.71 %
hc 120 ppm
lambda 0.91

second fast idle
co 4.62%
hc 150 ppm
lambda 0.88

natural idle test
co 7.18 %

failed test uite bad, any ideas to resolve??
All the results show that it's running rich . The lambda as said above should be between .97 to 1.03 , with it on .88 means running rich also with the co that high also running rich and hc's again say's there's to much unburnt fuel .
I take it the cat's are in place ?There is no missfire ? has it been mapped ?
has the fuel pressure been raised ? is the airfilter clean . Also if the cats are fitted then with it running like this it's quite likely to smell of rotten eggs , thats if the cats have'nt already had it .
Old 01 June 2007, 06:55 PM
  #6  
jap-sti-555
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
jap-sti-555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

mine is a 1996 sti and i thought this sensor was only about £60. is the location under the drivers side? im confused about the whole thing still.
Old 01 June 2007, 06:59 PM
  #7  
jap-sti-555
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
jap-sti-555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i only have the 1st cat in place (down pipe cat) the other has been removed due to new exhaust. was told this should still pass with just the one, is this the case? i did have a remap but have fitted front mount intercooler since this.

Trending Topics

Old 01 June 2007, 07:35 PM
  #8  
scuba_doo
Scooby Regular
 
scuba_doo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Carmarthenshire
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

After fitting a fmic , think you would need the mapping adjusted to suit the changes . I'm an mot tester and was a diagnostic tech and as i said above from the readings it's running to rich for some reason . First steps i would take is to check airfilter and also maf as i believe these are prone to problems , if the maf is reporting a to higher airflow then actual ,the engine ecu will inject more fuel to keep the mixture correct which would then send the lambda down and the co and hc's up . Also did you have any of that dodgy fuel from tesco's as that messed with lambda sensors !
Old 01 June 2007, 07:46 PM
  #9  
jap-sti-555
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
jap-sti-555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

no not had that fuel. how do i go about getting these checked out? i had diagnostics done already and it did show lambda fault. would fitting new lambda fix the problem or is there still something more to it like you said?
Old 01 June 2007, 07:51 PM
  #10  
Brit_in_Japan
Scooby Regular
 
Brit_in_Japan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: No longer Japan !
Posts: 1,742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Lambda sensors sense oxygen content in the exhaust gases. The ECU adjusts timing to make sure that the emissions are within the limits set by regulations. Someone else might know more about the lambda sensor on your model and give you more advice, I've not had a problem yet so haven't needed to change one.

Cars can pass emissions tests with only one catalytic converter, but that doesn't mean they will pass. The manufacturers would try to use the cheapest solution for passing emissions tests so why would they put in an extra cat costing £££ if they didn't need to? If you take one out, you might well fall foul of the emissions tests. As a minimum everything else would have to working properly, air filter, MAF etc, but if a car has been remapped then it's really down to the mapper to make sure emissions tests can still be passed. Some people change exhausts back to standard items for the MOT and then change back to their big-bore, de-catted, ear-drum splitting mega zorst afterwards, though it's a dubious practice as a car should be capable of passing an MOT at any time, not just during the test.

Edited to add: if you've fitted a FMIC since you had it mapped then it's not the mapper's fault it doesn't pass emissions. Sounds like you need to get another mapping session planned !

Last edited by Brit_in_Japan; 01 June 2007 at 07:56 PM. Reason: more info
Old 01 June 2007, 08:16 PM
  #11  
scuba_doo
Scooby Regular
 
scuba_doo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Carmarthenshire
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You really need to book it in for a diagnostic as guessing it's the lambda could cost you between £50 to £100 for a sensor and so on if it's not that,unless you have a mate that does'nt mind swopping bits with yours till you find the cause . But check the basics first like the airfilter and fuel pressure are not blocked and pressure is to high, and also a maf sensor is a few seconds to swop over .
Did it pass last year and if so what was the emissions readings then and what's been done to it since ?
Old 03 June 2007, 06:35 PM
  #12  
Alan Jeffery
Scooby Regular
 
Alan Jeffery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The lambda sensor should be checked at this point. The difficulty is in determining the correct wire to check as the colours are different from UK and Jap spec. There are three wires. One earth and one 12v for the heater, and the signal wire. The signal wire is usually white on the car side of the lambda multi plug. With the engine running and up to temp you should see it moving between .1 and .9 of a volt if everything is fine. That shows the sensor is cycling, and keeping the mixture correct. If it sits at around .9 of a volt all the time, the sensor is fine, but the mixture is too rich for some other reason. If it's showing .1 of a volt all the time, the mixture is weak.
Got that?
Now, if the sensor is showing around .5 of a volt all the time, it's duff.
Old 03 June 2007, 06:38 PM
  #13  
Alan Jeffery
Scooby Regular
 
Alan Jeffery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

By the way, the early cars are quite happy with an after market three wire lambda ( two whites and a black ) at about £30. Black goes to white on the car, and the other two can go either way!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fatboy_coach
General Technical
15
18 June 2016 03:48 PM
Tidgy
Computer & Technology Related
33
18 October 2015 09:59 AM
the shreksta
General Technical
27
02 October 2015 03:20 PM
Ganz1983
Subaru
5
02 October 2015 09:22 AM
mistermexican
General Technical
2
01 October 2015 04:30 PM



Quick Reply: emissions test results! help explaine please!!



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:57 PM.