400 bhp maf
#3
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 2,209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#6
Scooby Regular
Originally Posted by AndrewC
Perhaps he already has a remapped OEM ECU?
can't remember exactly what they say is safe to run on the standard ecu
Trending Topics
#11
Scooby Regular
Originally Posted by sc00bylee
Ahhhhhh, cheers for that, Im running power FC on mine and didnt know that, is it a big job to bin the maf on this system then?
#14
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 2,209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wow - there's a lot of mis-information floating about in this thread
There is no Subaru version of the PowerFC that can natively operate without a MAF signal (there is a D-Jetro PowerFC but not for Subaru), it is possible to simulate a MAF signal from other sensors (MAP, RPM, TPS) and feed that to the ECU using the MAFSIM, however, this is somewhat of a last resort for installations where a MAF cannot be used.
Also, there is no reason why a suitably remapped std ECU can't perform aswell as an aftermarket ECU upto and beyond 400bhp, the only problem on the early cars is the complexity of mapping the ECU.
Andrew...
There is no Subaru version of the PowerFC that can natively operate without a MAF signal (there is a D-Jetro PowerFC but not for Subaru), it is possible to simulate a MAF signal from other sensors (MAP, RPM, TPS) and feed that to the ECU using the MAFSIM, however, this is somewhat of a last resort for installations where a MAF cannot be used.
Also, there is no reason why a suitably remapped std ECU can't perform aswell as an aftermarket ECU upto and beyond 400bhp, the only problem on the early cars is the complexity of mapping the ECU.
Andrew...
#15
Scooby Regular
Originally Posted by AndrewC
Wow - there's a lot of mis-information floating about in this thread
There is no Subaru version of the PowerFC that can natively operate without a MAF signal (there is a D-Jetro PowerFC but not for Subaru), it is possible to simulate a MAF signal from other sensors (MAP, RPM, TPS) and feed that to the ECU using the MAFSIM, however, this is somewhat of a last resort for installations where a MAF cannot be used.
Also, there is no reason why a suitably remapped std ECU can't perform aswell as an aftermarket ECU upto and beyond 400bhp, the only problem on the early cars is the complexity of mapping the ECU.
Andrew...
There is no Subaru version of the PowerFC that can natively operate without a MAF signal (there is a D-Jetro PowerFC but not for Subaru), it is possible to simulate a MAF signal from other sensors (MAP, RPM, TPS) and feed that to the ECU using the MAFSIM, however, this is somewhat of a last resort for installations where a MAF cannot be used.
Also, there is no reason why a suitably remapped std ECU can't perform aswell as an aftermarket ECU upto and beyond 400bhp, the only problem on the early cars is the complexity of mapping the ECU.
Andrew...
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 2,209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by sc00bylee
So how does this work?? does it it run on more than 5v??
its pysicaly the same size.
So how does Andy F have Apexi management with no maf??
its pysicaly the same size.
So how does Andy F have Apexi management with no maf??
It is physically the same plastic moulding.
Andy is the sole UK commercial mapper supplying and fitting the MAFSIM for the PowerFC.
Andrew...
#17
Looks like i will be keeping the MAF then!!
Cheers,
So how does the 300ZX one work better, my standard unit is giving 5.1v readings on the commander so is this about maxed out?
Cheers,
So how does the 300ZX one work better, my standard unit is giving 5.1v readings on the commander so is this about maxed out?
#19
Scooby Regular
You can buy an STi v4 maf from the main dealers for around £190 new...Just requires rewiring...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
18 November 2015 07:03 AM