Notices

Inlet manifold reversal

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17 September 2006, 12:53 PM
  #1  
worbs
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
worbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Now with added 2.1 jun/cosworth power
Posts: 998
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Inlet manifold reversal

Hi all iv recently removed the engine from my version 1 sti due to head gasket faliure, at the moment the engine is sitting in the garage being stripped down while im in the process of cleaning, tidying, painting and powder coating bits and pieces, iv noticed that if i place the inlet manifold on the block as if i was reversing it, throttle body at the front, it seems to fit exaclty right, iv not bolted it down or anything yet, i wanted to eventually look into this as going for an fmic, surley its not that easy!, is it?
Old 17 September 2006, 01:17 PM
  #2  
LegacySTi
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
 
LegacySTi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Dublin, Eire
Posts: 2,785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

interested in this too?
Old 17 September 2006, 01:25 PM
  #3  
worbs
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
worbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Now with added 2.1 jun/cosworth power
Posts: 998
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LegacySTi
interested in this too?

ill try and get some pics up but will have to use camera phone, i lent my digi camera to my parents to take on holiday .

As i said seems to fit perfectly all bolt holes line up injector cut outs in the manifold and block line up, if it did fit corrctly it would just be a case of extending a few wires and hoses and coming up with a way to get the throttle cable to fit/work correctly.
Old 17 September 2006, 03:59 PM
  #4  
jaytc2003
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
jaytc2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Manchester ish
Posts: 18,547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

plenty have done it on here. I think it actually needs to be cut and welded. Project section will probably give more detail
Old 17 September 2006, 04:40 PM
  #5  
worbs
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
worbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Now with added 2.1 jun/cosworth power
Posts: 998
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Was just thinking the alternator, power steering pump, a/c compressor are all taken of the engine at the mo, think the throttle body may fowl the alternator, will find out when go back to down to my garage.
Old 17 September 2006, 04:43 PM
  #6  
banny sti
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (68)
 
banny sti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Type R
Posts: 16,598
Received 22 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Try this mate maybe an easier option

https://www.scoobynet.com/phase-1-reversed-t543922.html

banny
Old 17 September 2006, 04:58 PM
  #7  
David_Wallis
Scooby Regular
 
David_Wallis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Try shutting the bonnet, its not that easy!
Old 18 September 2006, 10:44 AM
  #8  
worbs
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
worbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Now with added 2.1 jun/cosworth power
Posts: 998
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by David_Wallis
Try shutting the bonnet, its not that easy!

I never thought about that either lol, ok maybe not as simple as i thought, im going to look into more though will keep you posted,


Banny thanks for that mate, but i think i could prob whip my own up, looks a quality bit of kit though.
Old 18 September 2006, 02:18 PM
  #9  
David_Wallis
Scooby Regular
 
David_Wallis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Should hope it does, as its mine and I made it
Old 18 September 2006, 03:47 PM
  #10  
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Throttle body fouls the alternator.. try alternator totally obscures the intercooler pipe work.. you need to remove the air con compressor.. no room and move the alternator over.

Also the idle valve clashes with the power steering resevoir.. along with the throttle linkage.. the inlet manifold / throttle body also point up slightly, as David suggests the TB or the intercooler pipe work will hit the bonnet.

David to weld a plate to the front of my manifold and drill for the throttle body.

http://jollygreenmonster.fotopic.net/p33071215.html
http://jollygreenmonster.fotopic.net/p33071216.html

You need to cross David's hand with folding stuff.

Simon
Old 18 September 2006, 05:23 PM
  #11  
David_Wallis
Scooby Regular
 
David_Wallis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

LOL @ Simon.

yeah I have been known to do a few

I never made AndyFs but I did machine the ally that he welded on
Old 18 September 2006, 05:50 PM
  #12  
Heple
Scooby Regular
 
Heple's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Lancashire : MY99 UK Turbo
Posts: 712
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What are the advantages to this?

Craig
Old 18 September 2006, 07:38 PM
  #13  
banny sti
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (68)
 
banny sti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Type R
Posts: 16,598
Received 22 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Simon is there any point me doing this before the remap?

banny
Old 18 September 2006, 09:58 PM
  #14  
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Banny,

If you ARE going to do it then yes better before the remap..

Although would not alter the whole map and so would only need a tweak (or perhaps only a check up) to sort after etc.. in theory you are only changing the pipe length and would therefore only be effecting the time to fill the pipes, and would have little effect.

Simon
Old 18 September 2006, 09:59 PM
  #15  
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Heple
What are the advantages to this?

Craig
shorter pipe runs.. less lag.. look neat.. lol frees up space..

Simon
Old 18 September 2006, 10:49 PM
  #16  
Heple
Scooby Regular
 
Heple's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Lancashire : MY99 UK Turbo
Posts: 712
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jolly Green Monster
shorter pipe runs.. less lag.. look neat.. lol frees up space..

Simon
Sounds good but i value my air con more
Old 18 September 2006, 11:24 PM
  #17  
David_Wallis
Scooby Regular
 
David_Wallis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

just put up with a flat battery
Old 18 September 2006, 11:29 PM
  #18  
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by David_Wallis
just put up with a flat battery
Old 18 September 2006, 11:29 PM
  #19  
Heple
Scooby Regular
 
Heple's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Lancashire : MY99 UK Turbo
Posts: 712
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by David_Wallis
just put up with a flat battery
I like my radio too

Maybe when its no longer my commuting car i'd consider it, as i would then consider the aircon to be excess weight

and the turbo not big enough or rotated enough

aswell as the cc to be to little etc etc etc........

Old 18 September 2006, 11:29 PM
  #20  
David_Wallis
Scooby Regular
 
David_Wallis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

no alternator you tit!
Old 18 September 2006, 11:44 PM
  #21  
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

lol.. I should drink less.. or perhaps more?

Simon
Old 18 September 2006, 11:45 PM
  #22  
David_Wallis
Scooby Regular
 
David_Wallis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Less, Much better for you
Old 18 September 2006, 11:46 PM
  #23  
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

in someways and not in others.. lol
Old 19 September 2006, 05:19 PM
  #24  
neil@eclipse
BANNED
 
neil@eclipse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: www.ladsoc.co.uk
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I had a go at this myself..
Reversing the entrance into the inlet manifold itself I found quite easy.....

http://i41.photobucket.com/albums/e2...lipseWRX42.jpg

It was all the other stuff that took a bit of time to work/sort out....
Alternator bracket, belt re-routing and tensioner, power steering reservoir, throttle cable set up...

Although having said that, once you've done one, it's easy second time around..
Old 19 September 2006, 07:32 PM
  #25  
David_Wallis
Scooby Regular
 
David_Wallis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Yep, However Id be seriously concerned about the mounting angle of your turbo and the manufacturers recommended angles!

David
Old 20 September 2006, 09:31 AM
  #26  
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by David_Wallis
Yep, However Id be seriously concerned about the mounting angle of your turbo and the manufacturers recommended angles!

David
would be fine if it is a downhill car!
Old 20 September 2006, 03:51 PM
  #27  
neil@eclipse
BANNED
 
neil@eclipse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: www.ladsoc.co.uk
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by David_Wallis
Yep, However Id be seriously concerned about the mounting angle of your turbo and the manufacturers recommended angles!

David
Had concerns about that miself, especially with regards the oil and bearing issue.
But surely the oil is under pressure around the bearing, and 'shouldn't' be too much of a problem...???
Old 20 September 2006, 06:16 PM
  #28  
David_Wallis
Scooby Regular
 
David_Wallis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Garrett state guidlines.. Im sure they do for a reason

How many miles has it done like that?

If it breaks Ive got a 35/42 for sale
Old 20 September 2006, 09:08 PM
  #29  
neil@eclipse
BANNED
 
neil@eclipse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: www.ladsoc.co.uk
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by David_Wallis
Garrett state guidlines.. Im sure they do for a reason

How many miles has it done like that?

If it breaks Ive got a 35/42 for sale
LOL, have you not got rid of all that gear yet..??
Must be too expensive

TBH, I've only done around 2000 miles on it, the gearbox has give up before I can get any decent miles on the bl@@dy thing
Old 22 September 2006, 12:00 AM
  #30  
David_Wallis
Scooby Regular
 
David_Wallis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

LOL.. Too expensive yeah right!

Dare I ask you what you paid for tubo, headers, downpipe, oil & water pipe, wastegate?

David


Quick Reply: Inlet manifold reversal



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:29 PM.