Notices

charge cooler

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11 April 2006, 09:37 PM
  #1  
ste300
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
ste300's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default charge cooler

It occurs to me, being a race tech that heat and subsequently air is absorbed 8 times more by water than by even very cold dense air. Hence a chargecooler being more efficent in a purely mathamatical sense. As legacy's have chargecoolerswhich are reasily available and cheap, around £120 all in is there anyreason as to why this wouldnt be more efficent than the standard intercooler on my 95 wrx?
Old 11 April 2006, 10:53 PM
  #2  
briforbes
Scooby Regular
 
briforbes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Innerleithen / Edinburgh
Posts: 745
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I believe the pipework (may be something other than pipework) makes it too restrictive to actually offer any advantage.
Old 11 April 2006, 11:30 PM
  #3  
ZEN Performance
Former Sponsor
 
ZEN Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wellingborough, Northamptonshire
Posts: 2,859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What are you going to do with the heat once it's in the water?
Old 11 April 2006, 11:49 PM
  #4  
Fuzz
Scooby Regular
 
Fuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Under your bonnet
Posts: 9,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A second rad laid flat under the rear of the car with ducting to suit was my idea

Andy
Old 12 April 2006, 12:04 AM
  #5  
ZEN Performance
Former Sponsor
 
ZEN Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wellingborough, Northamptonshire
Posts: 2,859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fuzz
A second rad laid flat under the rear of the car with ducting to suit was my idea

Andy
And where precisely does the heat go from the radiator?
Old 12 April 2006, 08:15 AM
  #6  
Fuzz
Scooby Regular
 
Fuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Under your bonnet
Posts: 9,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

out of the back of the car along with the rest of the air, if ducted correctly.

If the exhaust is in the left hand rear then rad can go in the right hand side, a bit like gearbox oil coolers, although a bit more hefty.
I'm sure a decent rear duct taken from say the rear wheel arch to feed the rad and then exited via the vacuum effect of groundforce...

I've jut written all that and now think you are getting at the fact it's back to air doing the cooling..
As long as the rad is more efficient (due to being larger) than the (small) charge cooler.......
Anyway I better get up and go to work or. I'll be late.

Andy
Old 12 April 2006, 08:22 AM
  #7  
[Davey]
Scooby Regular
 
[Davey]'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 3,327
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

We had this discussion recently

https://www.scoobynet.com/general-technical-10/498422-charge-cooler.html

Trending Topics

Old 12 April 2006, 10:31 AM
  #8  
ZEN Performance
Former Sponsor
 
ZEN Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wellingborough, Northamptonshire
Posts: 2,859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fuzz
out of the back of the car along with the rest of the air, if ducted correctly.

If the exhaust is in the left hand rear then rad can go in the right hand side, a bit like gearbox oil coolers, although a bit more hefty.
I'm sure a decent rear duct taken from say the rear wheel arch to feed the rad and then exited via the vacuum effect of groundforce...

I've jut written all that and now think you are getting at the fact it's back to air doing the cooling..
As long as the rad is more efficient (due to being larger) than the (small) charge cooler.......
Anyway I better get up and go to work or. I'll be late.

Andy
You're going to need an awfully big water tank if you're pissing it all out the back

Already discussed at length.

Paul
Old 12 April 2006, 11:49 AM
  #9  
Gary C
Scooby Regular
 
Gary C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,301
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

He is saying that you should be able to increase the efficiency of the size restricted I/C using water, then cool the water with a larger remote rad (as you are no doubt aware )

Seems marginal to me, However the Toyota GT4 ST165 and ST205's used charge coolers though the ST185 did not.

Surely on the move, more than enough air is coming in an STi MY03 scoop to cool the I/C core.
Old 12 April 2006, 02:16 PM
  #10  
ste300
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
ste300's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

aight, just a thought, i did the maths on it but just wanted some real world thoughts on the matter. thanks.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
28 December 2015 11:07 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
18 November 2015 07:03 AM
wrxcook
ScoobyNet General
3
29 September 2015 09:17 PM
lozgti1
Non Scooby Related
8
28 September 2015 03:49 AM
Pro-Line Motorsport
Car Parts For Sale
0
27 September 2015 11:21 AM



Quick Reply: charge cooler



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:47 PM.