Notices
General Technical
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

TD05/06 20g, TD06 20g whats the real difference?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 13, 2005 | 08:20 PM
  #1  
Neilo's Avatar
Neilo
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,734
Likes: 0
From: Behind the wheel of a Time Attack R33 GTR
Default TD05/06 20g, TD06 20g whats the real difference?

im looking at these 2 turbos, but im not sure of the "real" difference betwene them....spool times, out and out power etc...

Im looking for a 400bhp build so the turbo choice is quite key.

Thanks
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2005 | 08:22 PM
  #2  
stevebt's Avatar
stevebt
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,732
Likes: 33
Default

alan bell has the td06 20g on his car and his last car had a td05/06 20g so he may be your best person to ask
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2005 | 08:23 PM
  #3  
Neilo's Avatar
Neilo
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,734
Likes: 0
From: Behind the wheel of a Time Attack R33 GTR
Default

i thought alan had the TD06-49 from lateral......thought that was different...
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2005 | 08:26 PM
  #4  
john banks's Avatar
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 1
From: 32 cylinders and many cats
Default

Different turbine wheels. The 20G compressor may not be fully exploited by the 05H turbine, capping the power to say 380-400 BHP on Optimax depending on rollers, and 10% more with methanol or octane booster. There is also a Fatboy turbine wheel from Deadbolt which may or may not be a T31 Garrett wheel, for which they claim another 5-10 BHP and quicker spoolup than the 06H. If I ever do another 2.5 Scooby I think I would be wondering about a SZ55 with the Fatboy wheel, but I wouldn't even consider bigger than a TD05/06 20G on a 2.0 unless it was a built motor and I could run 2 bar. NASIOC has some info on the difference between spool up on the 05H vs 06H turbine wheels, sometimes the 06H can sound disappointing from the spool up reports. On a 2.0 the 05H-20G hits a bar at about 3000 with OEM manifold, later on tubular. On 2.5 it is about 500 RPM earlier. Unless there is a massive torque hit to compensate then you might find that something that doesn't hit full boost until 4000 RPM or higher in a low gear might be a PITA on a road car.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2005 | 08:29 PM
  #5  
WUZ's Avatar
WUZ
Scooby Senior
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 3,384
Likes: 27
From: Aberdeenshire
Default

TD05/06 = TD05 hotside, TD06 Compressor, 20G compressor wheel

TD06 20G = TD06 hotside, TD06 Compressor, 20G compressor wheel

ie, TD06 20G will flow more up at the top end due to the bigger hotside having lower backpressure at higher levels, but due to the bigger hotside, will be laggier ( by about 700rpm, AFAIR)

Russell
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2005 | 08:37 PM
  #6  
3barboost's Avatar
3barboost
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
From: Johannesburg
Default

On a 2.0 Classic I have achieved 201kw at the wheels about 270hp on the wheels on a heartbreaker dyno at an altitude of 1600m above sea level on 102 octane fuel on std Classic internals using an 05h 20G from Deadbolt boosting 1.25 bar.

For your purposes and your climate / altitude / fuel I think a 05H 20G will easily make 400 flywheel horses at not much boost either

The spool up of the Deadbolt 05h 20G on the 2.0 is better than that of a VF23 and that of a VF22

For a 2.0 I can think of no better turbo than the 05h 20G

I got dyno sheets that can compare the spool up where the turbo is the only item changed, but cant figure out how to post,
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2005 | 08:52 PM
  #7  
john banks's Avatar
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 1
From: 32 cylinders and many cats
Default

Photobucket and then post with [ img ] and [ /img ] tags without the spaces.
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Dec 13, 2005 | 08:58 PM
  #8  
john banks's Avatar
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 1
From: 32 cylinders and many cats
Default

Dyno should be temp and atmo compensated though?

The 05H-20Gs do not sail through 400 BHP on the more believable UK dynos without a lot of octane though. Maybe with Optimax and a bottle of Millers they would

I wouldn't like to lose 700 RPM of spool up myself though in going to the bigger turbine.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2005 | 09:00 PM
  #9  
Neilo's Avatar
Neilo
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,734
Likes: 0
From: Behind the wheel of a Time Attack R33 GTR
Default

what about using them on a 2.33?
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2005 | 09:54 PM
  #10  
john banks's Avatar
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 1
From: 32 cylinders and many cats
Default

Treat like a 2.5 for spool up.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2005 | 09:59 PM
  #11  
alanbell's Avatar
alanbell
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,825
Likes: 3
From: Yorkshire.
Default

Originally Posted by Neilo
i thought alan had the TD06-49 from lateral......thought that was different...
And its good ,
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2005 | 10:01 PM
  #12  
Neilo's Avatar
Neilo
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,734
Likes: 0
From: Behind the wheel of a Time Attack R33 GTR
Default

is it different alan? or is it a TD06 20g?
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2005 | 10:07 PM
  #13  
alanbell's Avatar
alanbell
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,825
Likes: 3
From: Yorkshire.
Default

Its different ?? Best wait for Mark > Andy > Steven who has done all the work on my car !! because i dont know the anwer , cheers Alan,
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2005 | 10:19 PM
  #14  
Neilo's Avatar
Neilo
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,734
Likes: 0
From: Behind the wheel of a Time Attack R33 GTR
Default

fair enough!
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2005 | 10:19 PM
  #15  
SCOOBYD00's Avatar
SCOOBYD00
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,746
Likes: 1
From: The Grim North
Default

Originally Posted by Neilo
im looking at these 2 turbos, but im not sure of the "real" difference betwene them....spool times, out and out power etc...

Im looking for a 400bhp build so the turbo choice is quite key.

Thanks
AndyF supplied mine... then the grin just got wider...
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2005 | 10:42 PM
  #16  
Neilo's Avatar
Neilo
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,734
Likes: 0
From: Behind the wheel of a Time Attack R33 GTR
Default

on what engine mate? was it built? or a standard 2.0/2.5?
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2005 | 11:49 PM
  #17  
Midlife......'s Avatar
Midlife......
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 11,583
Likes: 4
Default

Neilo

I run a TD05 18G (Deadbolt) on my bugeye WRX as the revs are lower ...

Shaun
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2005 | 07:00 AM
  #18  
3barboost's Avatar
3barboost
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
From: Johannesburg
Default 05h 20g on a classic

here is a dyno sheet of an 05h 20g on a classic with the following mods
Equal length headers
EcuTek remap
Standard induction and air box
Perrin turbo to maf intake
Sti8 TMIC

The dotted line is the cars previous run with a hybrid VF22/23 homebrew turbo, 22 compressor and 23 exhaust

This car runs a 12.8 1/4 with a terminal speed of 180kmh

We are proud of the results as our fuel is poor and so is our altitude and ambient temps, the map needs some work to sort out the mid range dip and then i expect the result to be even better, this was a max boost pressure of 1.25b

Reply
Old Dec 14, 2005 | 07:04 AM
  #19  
3barboost's Avatar
3barboost
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
From: Johannesburg
Default TD05H 20G on blob eye WRX

This is a dyno of a TD05H 20G on a blob eye wrx
with STi short block
RC engineering 650cc injectors
wrx intercooler
std induction and airbox
Perrin turbo to MAF hose

This car feels incredible on the road

Again the map needs work

The previous run is using a vf23

Reply
Old Dec 14, 2005 | 07:07 AM
  #20  
3barboost's Avatar
3barboost
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
From: Johannesburg
Default TD05H 18G on sti8

Sti8

05H 18G

Reply
Old Dec 14, 2005 | 09:10 AM
  #21  
Neilo's Avatar
Neilo
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,734
Likes: 0
From: Behind the wheel of a Time Attack R33 GTR
Default

all those figures seem really low? unless theyre at the wheels????
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2005 | 09:11 AM
  #22  
Neilo's Avatar
Neilo
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,734
Likes: 0
From: Behind the wheel of a Time Attack R33 GTR
Default

ahh wait, are they in kw?
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2005 | 09:30 AM
  #23  
3barboost's Avatar
3barboost
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
From: Johannesburg
Default

Yip those are real wheel kilowatts at Johannesburg altitude of 1600m asl with an ambient temp of prob 28deg C and in dyno room temp of 22deg C

the 201 wheel kilowatts is actually the first time the 200 wheel kilowatts barrier has ever been broken in Johannesburg. And it took an 05H 20G to do it
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2005 | 06:28 PM
  #24  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Default

Originally Posted by Neilo
Im looking for a 400bhp build so the turbo choice is quite key.

Thanks
Just press the button

The 06 turbine wheel on a 2.0 may make more power but could result in a slower car due to the narrower powerband. Sometimes starting with a specific bhp goal isn't the way to go as you tend to compromise on overall performance to achieve it, if that makes sense ?

Quite how to quantify a performance target is a bit difficult. Someone suggested having a minimum of 50% of your rpm band available at full boost, (not just in a high gear but say 2nd gear upwards) By full boost I mean capability to hold it efficiently at the top end as well as achieve the midrange.

Andy
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2005 | 06:37 PM
  #25  
Neilo's Avatar
Neilo
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,734
Likes: 0
From: Behind the wheel of a Time Attack R33 GTR
Default

i agree about the narrowness of the power band thats why i think that i may have settled on the 2.33 to help drive the turbo when i settle on it...
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2005 | 07:27 PM
  #26  
stevebt's Avatar
stevebt
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,732
Likes: 33
Default

neil why dont you stroke your 2ltr then add the 20g as it will spool a little earlier
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2005 | 07:34 PM
  #27  
Neilo's Avatar
Neilo
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,734
Likes: 0
From: Behind the wheel of a Time Attack R33 GTR
Default

because ive been told that stroking the 2.0 ist worth the hassle when the 2.33 will be pretty much the same price....they are all pretty much the same price in fact...

2.2 is only a little over 2.1 (so ive been told)
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2005 | 07:56 PM
  #28  
stevebt's Avatar
stevebt
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,732
Likes: 33
Default

i would of thought there was a huge difference in price?? but what do i know
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2005 | 08:11 PM
  #29  
Neilo's Avatar
Neilo
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,734
Likes: 0
From: Behind the wheel of a Time Attack R33 GTR
Default

you forget steve, whatever engine i will get is practically being built from scatch, so there is no need to crack open anything to start with.

Then youve just got to have all the necessary parts handy to create the 2.33 engine
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Abx
Subaru
22
Jan 9, 2016 05:42 PM
Sam Witwicky
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
17
Nov 13, 2015 10:49 AM
KK3960
General Technical
3
Oct 7, 2015 12:33 PM
GB270_CALUM
General Technical
4
Oct 1, 2015 09:50 PM
shorty87
Other Marques
0
Sep 25, 2015 08:52 PM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:10 AM.