Notices

Lightened flywheel

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07 June 2005, 09:27 AM
  #1  
John WRX
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
John WRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Wirral & Scoobysmacs
Posts: 2,637
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Lightened flywheel

Been asked to post this by Frank (Redwrx) as he cant get to a pc.

What are the advantages and disadvantages of running with a lightened flywheel such as power increases and fuel consumption ??

Cheers.
Old 07 June 2005, 09:56 AM
  #2  
Neilo
Scooby Regular
 
Neilo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Behind the wheel of a Time Attack R33 GTR
Posts: 5,734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

no real power increase but the revs will rise quicker thus aiding acceleration. On the downside, engine braking will be greatly reduced. Basically it helps the engine on the way up but can harm it a lot more on the way down....(as advised by Branko from BRD)
Old 07 June 2005, 01:49 PM
  #3  
Aztec Performance Ltd
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (234)
 
Aztec Performance Ltd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Over 500ft/lbs of torque @ just 1.1bar
Posts: 14,406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

We had this discussion some time ago and such was the difference in opinion (weighed in favour of ) that I brought a lightweight flywheel (4.5kg) only to sell it without it even making it onto the car. I then thought 'what the hell' and brought another ultralight flywheel (4.2kgs) and had it fitted to my car (along with many other bits).

The negatives that came up on the thread were:

*Makes the car idle badly
*Makes the car too hard to launch
*Doesnt make a difference to performance
*Engine braking etc etc

My experiences:

*Intially makes the car feel lighter and more free revving
*Idle - unchanged
*Performance? Not one for bhp (number) chasers, but makes a positive difference on the road.
*No problem with launching. Yes it takes more skill to stop bogging but I had no probs achieving consistant 1.7s 60ft at the drag strip.

I will most definatley be sticking with lightweight flywheels
Old 07 June 2005, 01:52 PM
  #4  
Neilo
Scooby Regular
 
Neilo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Behind the wheel of a Time Attack R33 GTR
Posts: 5,734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

agree with BOB there, it depends what the cars going to be used for as well.

I think when the time comes i will get a lighter one, but only slightly....maybe the 8.6kg variety that seems to go round....horses for courses and all that...
Old 07 June 2005, 04:15 PM
  #5  
John WRX
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
John WRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Wirral & Scoobysmacs
Posts: 2,637
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What about fuel consumption? thats his main issue.
Old 07 June 2005, 04:22 PM
  #6  
Aztec Performance Ltd
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (234)
 
Aztec Performance Ltd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Over 500ft/lbs of torque @ just 1.1bar
Posts: 14,406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Havent noticed any difference in fuel consumption and cant see any reason why it should be effected?
Old 07 June 2005, 07:14 PM
  #7  
stu_5
Scooby Regular
 
stu_5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Neilo
no real power increase but the revs will rise quicker thus aiding acceleration. On the downside, engine braking will be greatly reduced. Basically it helps the engine on the way up but can harm it a lot more on the way down....(as advised by Branko from BRD)
This has been discussed before.

Suprisingly engine braking should increase.

Friction losses within the engine are the same, but the momentum to keep it running at the same speed when you lift off has been reduced so the revs will fall faster- the same way they rise.
Old 07 June 2005, 07:15 PM
  #8  
stu_5
Scooby Regular
 
stu_5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If anything fuel consumption would also fall- engine has to do less work. Wouldnt expect to notice it on anything other than a test bed however!
Old 07 June 2005, 07:17 PM
  #9  
Neilo
Scooby Regular
 
Neilo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Behind the wheel of a Time Attack R33 GTR
Posts: 5,734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

either way i was told it wasnt so good for the engine on the way back down.....??
Old 07 June 2005, 07:22 PM
  #10  
stu_5
Scooby Regular
 
stu_5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

to be honest I'd be more concerned for it on the way up under load. The issue is the engines designed with the flywheel to act to help counter imbalances present within it. Never seen any problems on mine, but thats only with an oem item machined down by API. - Something similar to thats probably the best way to go on a cost/return basis.

If your really bothered however and are going for something very light at around 4.5kg- change the pulley counterweights at the front as well for lightened items to help bring it back in balance.
Old 07 June 2005, 11:12 PM
  #11  
Aztec Performance Ltd
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (234)
 
Aztec Performance Ltd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Over 500ft/lbs of torque @ just 1.1bar
Posts: 14,406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

David has mentioned before what you say stu_5

Mines running a dream so not going to bother messing around with it.

Bob
Old 08 June 2005, 10:52 PM
  #12  
theotherphil
Scooby Regular
 
theotherphil's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 962
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Same experience as Bob. I am also running a 4.2kg fw (Fidanza) with no problems. The difference in "pull" through the gears is like night and day - really noticable!
Old 10 June 2005, 10:39 AM
  #13  
John WRX
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
John WRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Wirral & Scoobysmacs
Posts: 2,637
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

up for Frank for when he gets home from holiday/work
Old 10 June 2005, 05:20 PM
  #14  
timmyajmy93wrx
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (27)
 
timmyajmy93wrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

well i hope it is good news for light weight flywheels i just bought an exedy 4.5kgs flywheel and a nice ACT organic clutch (420lbs capable). I already
have the GO Fast Bits lightweight pulleys at the front 'to balance it out'

have to see what a difference it makes when i get it done - sounds promising, then i will be off for a trip to see havey for a fmic!

tim
Old 10 June 2005, 06:13 PM
  #15  
murfs
Scooby Regular
 
murfs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cork, Ireland
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by timmyajmy93wrx
well i hope it is good news for light weight flywheels i just bought an exedy 4.5kgs flywheel and a nice ACT organic clutch (420lbs capable). I already
have the GO Fast Bits lightweight pulleys at the front 'to balance it out'

have to see what a difference it makes when i get it done - sounds promising, then i will be off for a trip to see havey for a fmic!

tim
I'm thinking of doing the same, lets us know when it's all done and how you get on with it. I'm more interested in a quick start than big HP, and that should help.

Best of luck
Murfs
Old 10 June 2005, 06:17 PM
  #16  
StickyMicky
Scooby Regular
 
StickyMicky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Zed Ess Won Hay Tee
Posts: 21,611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i run a 7.5kg as performance item

i thought i noticed a marginal increase in MPG, but i cant be sure

it did make "heel and toe" much much easier tho
Old 10 June 2005, 08:34 PM
  #17  
98prodrivewrs
Scooby Regular
 
98prodrivewrs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

Is it benificial to the engine meaning less stress on it
Old 11 June 2005, 08:31 PM
  #18  
redwrx
Scooby Regular
 
redwrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 2,381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the info guys, and thanks John for posting this for me..

Frank
Old 12 June 2005, 09:34 AM
  #19  
vulnax999
Scooby Senior
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (7)
 
vulnax999's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 4,347
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by John WRX
What about fuel consumption? thats his main issue.
Then buy a Diesel!!!

Mine is a lightened OEM one at 8kg ( By ASPerformance approx £100 exchange ) and is fine - no downsides and engine spins up a bit quicker, as less mass to get moving ( and to slow down too! ).
It's smooth and not jerky on pulling away, launches fine without bogging.

Very lightweight flywheels circa 4kg may have more issues?

As less metal to spin round, very slight fuel economy could be expected but offset by the better go!


I also got light front pulleys but not essential as the engine is not especially balanced front to back ( only rotationally ), so changing one end for lighter items won't cause any problems. Saved 3kg on front pullies but expensive way to do it!
Old 14 June 2005, 06:35 PM
  #20  
redwrx
Scooby Regular
 
redwrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 2,381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hopefully getting the car done this weekend,

the flywheel is 25% lightened.

As for economy, i still need to get some kinda sense from it...... for work based 'expenses' trips.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ganz1983
Subaru
5
02 October 2015 09:22 AM
speedrick
Subaru Parts
0
28 September 2015 01:06 PM
alex_00s
Drivetrain
2
26 September 2015 06:07 PM
speedrick
Subaru Parts
0
26 September 2015 03:01 PM
MightyArsenal
Wheels, Tyres & Brakes
6
25 September 2015 08:31 PM



Quick Reply: Lightened flywheel



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:07 AM.