Notices

Forester engine question.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05 February 2005, 08:13 PM
  #1  
chris's scooby
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
chris's scooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Forester engine question.

I'm thinking of getting a Forester in a couple of months but i'm not sure whether i should go for the 2.0 or the 2.5 model.

I'm trading in from a WR1 and would like to do something to the Forester to increase the engines output a little. I was thinking about a decat and remap but am happy to be guided by those who know their stuff!

So my question is really which of the 2 engines would be the better one to go for with the above in mind?

Chris
Old 05 February 2005, 08:23 PM
  #2  
stockcar
Scooby Regular
 
stockcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: north east
Posts: 6,664
Received 379 Likes on 301 Posts
Default

the main problem with these is the suspension/roll bar spec.............would be looking at these first (and brakes) before you go down the 'power' route...............

alyn
Old 05 February 2005, 09:47 PM
  #3  
chris's scooby
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
chris's scooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stockcar
the main problem with these is the suspension/roll bar spec.............would be looking at these first (and brakes) before you go down the 'power' route...............

alyn
Good thinking, i'll post a query in "suspension", unless anyone has any thoughts about what to do to those bits here?
Old 05 February 2005, 10:20 PM
  #4  
Engineer@Uni
Scooby Regular
 
Engineer@Uni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I absolutely agree with stockcar. The issue with the Forester is it's height and suspension setup. Going overboard on power will make them dangerous in my ippinion, as their cornering abilities are a lot different to imprezas. Their increased mass means slower reactions and less agility, as well as risk of them flipping over. If I were you, I'd get the car first and after a good few months of readjusting to it, see which area needs attention first.
Old 05 February 2005, 10:55 PM
  #5  
chris's scooby
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
chris's scooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Engineer@Uni
I absolutely agree with stockcar. The issue with the Forester is it's height and suspension setup. Going overboard on power will make them dangerous in my ippinion, as their cornering abilities are a lot different to imprezas. Their increased mass means slower reactions and less agility, as well as risk of them flipping over. If I were you, I'd get the car first and after a good few months of readjusting to it, see which area needs attention first.
Thanks. I'm not thinking of going overboarded on the mods, only about 250-270 bhp (ish) although may leave standard. Really wondered which would be the better engine to void the warranty on if i do tune it?
Old 06 February 2005, 05:26 PM
  #6  
chris's scooby
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
chris's scooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Anymore thoughts on the better engine to go for anyone?
Old 07 February 2005, 11:19 AM
  #7  
stevem2k
Scooby Regular
 
stevem2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Kingston ( Surrey, not Jamaica )
Posts: 4,670
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If you have the ££ then the 2.5 - but then you'll want to keep the warranty ( as it would be new ). Import STi like Mog's (from Ian Lit ) is what I would have given the money ( also means 6spd )

250-270 is still relatively easy on the 2.0 btw , but you it's easiest to start from a MY99+ JDM rather than UK model as the turbos are different.

Wheels / rubber / Suspension / Brakes need sorting before you go too mad, then a decat & map.

Upgrade path goes something like ...

17's , lower profile rubber , 18-22mm rear arb , F&R droplinks , springs ( or springs & struts ), uprated pads or 4pot swap , decat , power FC or Ecutek remap.

Cheers
Steve


www.subaruforester.com
Old 13 February 2005, 07:44 PM
  #8  
chris's scooby
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
chris's scooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for that. I've now registered on the Forester website.
Old 14 February 2005, 09:37 AM
  #9  
sammyh
Scooby Regular
Support Scoobynet!
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (1)
 
sammyh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Death Star
Posts: 21,835
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Engineer@Uni
dangerous in my ippinion, as their cornering abilities are a lot different to imprezas. Their increased mass means slower reactions and less agility
Not as much as you would think
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KAS35RSTI
Subaru
27
04 November 2021 07:12 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
28 December 2015 11:07 PM
Sam Witwicky
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
17
13 November 2015 10:49 AM
Brzoza
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
1
02 October 2015 05:26 PM
Ganz1983
Subaru
5
02 October 2015 09:22 AM



Quick Reply: Forester engine question.



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:27 PM.