Notices
General Technical
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Optimax Or NO Optimax

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 13, 2004 | 01:24 AM
  #1  
Pongo555's Avatar
Pongo555
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
From: Broxburn , West Lothian
Default Optimax Or NO Optimax

Hi folks just a quick question for you all am i gonna notice any difference at all running with optiamx on a standard turbo impreza compared to the usual unleaded it normally gets just wondering if there is any justification for the extra 5p a lit ?




Pongo555
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2004 | 03:03 AM
  #2  
Road Rager's Avatar
Road Rager
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
From: Northamptonshire
Default

you should feel quite an increase...

TBH i dont run on anything less
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2004 | 08:34 AM
  #3  
SilverTurboWagon's Avatar
SilverTurboWagon
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Default

You should always use SUL/Ultimate or Optimax. Best performance and protection for your engine.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2004 | 09:26 AM
  #4  
The_Judge's Avatar
The_Judge
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 0
From: Out of darkness cometh light
Default

You can use 95RON UL in a standard UK car, but you won't be getting the best out of it. Your ECU should be capable of retarding the ignition enough to protect your engine against knock, but why buy a performance car and use crap fuel...?
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2004 | 09:49 AM
  #5  
markwild's Avatar
markwild
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,046
Likes: 0
From: North Staffs. UK
Default

I ran my 98 UK Turbo on Safeway's Finest 95RON for 18 months when I first had it without any issues. BUT, I switched to optimax when I started 'tinkering' with it and haven't used anything else since......
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2004 | 10:03 AM
  #6  
Pongo555's Avatar
Pongo555
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
From: Broxburn , West Lothian
Default

Thanks for the help guys and the car is on its LAST tank of ****e fuel then lol optimax from now on lets see how it goes lol cheers again guys .



Pongo555
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2004 | 10:08 AM
  #7  
The_Judge's Avatar
The_Judge
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 0
From: Out of darkness cometh light
Default

You might want to try resetting the ECU as well, to give it a helping hand at advancing the ignition. I think you need to use a couple of tanks of Optimax first though...
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2004 | 07:08 PM
  #8  
markwild's Avatar
markwild
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,046
Likes: 0
From: North Staffs. UK
Default

Shouldn't need to reset a 98 MY ECU - I'm told (Graham at TSL) that it (and the 97) are self-resetting (I wanted it doing and he said 'no' and didn't charge me - )

Mark
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2004 | 08:52 PM
  #9  
WRX STI 4's Avatar
WRX STI 4
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Pongo555
Hi folks just a quick question for you all am i gonna notice any difference at all running with optiamx on a standard turbo impreza compared to the usual unleaded it normally gets just wondering if there is any justification for the extra 5p a lit ?




Pongo555
- My import hates running on optimax (tried three tanks full!) - It felt sluggish and underpowered - I went back to Super Unleaded - it flies!
Incidentally when I approached Shell about Optimax's octane rating(2002) I was told that it was 98 RON, yet no one could give me any paperwork to back this up!

To answer your question : it burns better than unleaded so in theory it will either give you better performance or better fuel economy - I did say in theory though !
As for ECU resets I am told, if you leave the battery off, for an hour or so, it should do the job.
Again there seems to be a view that ECU's adjust one way better than the other (with imports anyway).UK ECU's I’m not so sure about!
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2004 | 09:08 PM
  #10  
PETENAUD's Avatar
PETENAUD
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Default

I have owned my scoob for 18 months, and never used optimax, only esso sul, last weekend nearly emty tank and went into a shell ststion and filled up with optimax, so far, no difference at all.

Will prob give it another 2 tankfulls but i have my doubts.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 08:43 AM
  #11  
The_Judge's Avatar
The_Judge
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 0
From: Out of darkness cometh light
Default

It is strange how some cars prefer Optimax, and others prefer SUL. Personally, mine prefers BP Ultimate. Weird eh...?

Markwild, you're right about certain ECUs self-learning, but it doesn't hurt to reset, and could even uncover pending problems you didn't know were there (MAF for instance)...
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 09:49 AM
  #12  
IN THE STICKS's Avatar
IN THE STICKS
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,024
Likes: 0
From: I'm still around in deepest Essex, now with a Fiesta ST-2
Cool

I used 95 ron for the first few months when I got my MY99 at the end of 2002 , then changed to Optimax and noticed that it did run a little smoother but that was about all , I changed back to 95 ron a few weeks ago (just to see if I would see a big difference ) , and I cant really say there's that much in it at all

Dave
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 12:12 PM
  #13  
nom's Avatar
nom
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,602
Likes: 0
Default

I wouldn't use 95 if I were you - the minimum they are meant to run on is 98 (yes, including UKs - just look at one of the Euro cars which are identical in every way, except don't have the ridiculous PC ****e we have to put up with over here).
If you have any instrumentation that shows you what's going on when you put 95 in, you'd barely feather the throttle. I had to use some a couple of years ago & could barely touch boost without nasty lights flickering about.
Watch-it with that stuff!
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 01:39 PM
  #14  
The_Judge's Avatar
The_Judge
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 0
From: Out of darkness cometh light
Default

I think Nom's hit on a valid point there. A question to all the people who've said...

"I've tried both and can't notice any difference..."

Do any of you have a Knocklink...?
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 01:57 PM
  #15  
SamUK's Avatar
SamUK
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,507
Likes: 1
From: London
Question

Petenaud,

You mentioned you filled up your car with Optimax, on a empty tank...how much did the full tank cost? Also how many miles did you get out of that?

Sam
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 02:10 PM
  #16  
ozzy's Avatar
ozzy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 10,504
Likes: 1
From: Scotland, UK
Default

Originally Posted by The_Judge
I think Nom's hit on a valid point there. A question to all the people who've said...

"I've tried both and can't notice any difference..."

Do any of you have a Knocklink...?
I certainly noticed a big difference with my Knocklink activity switching from Optimax to BP Ultimate. I'm too scared to see what NUL would be like

Certainly on my MY99 Optimax appears to reduce the risk from detonation.

Stefan
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 02:16 PM
  #17  
SamUK's Avatar
SamUK
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,507
Likes: 1
From: London
Question

Petenaud,

You mentioned you filled up your car with Optimax, on a empty tank...how much did the full tank cost? Also how many miles did you get out of that?

Sam
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 02:18 PM
  #18  
IN THE STICKS's Avatar
IN THE STICKS
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,024
Likes: 0
From: I'm still around in deepest Essex, now with a Fiesta ST-2
Default

Back to Optimax for me then !
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 02:27 PM
  #19  
ozzy's Avatar
ozzy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 10,504
Likes: 1
From: Scotland, UK
Default

Without a Knocklink it's difficult to say what effect NUL has on any car. I would be surprised if it was anything but bad news, but it depends on how it's being driven.

If it was motorway cruising at 65mph or short-shifting around 3000 rpm then I doubt you'd be in much danger.

Again, it would also depend on the level of modifications on your car. I have the std AE801 ECU, but have a full de-cat (TSL DP, TSL centre + STI back box). Everything (other than suspension is std MY99 RB5), but running BP Ultimate had my knocklink looking like a Xmas tree at almost every gear change above 4,500 - 5,000 rpm.

Stefan

Stefan
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 03:49 PM
  #20  
The_Judge's Avatar
The_Judge
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 0
From: Out of darkness cometh light
Default

Bizarre. It was the other way round for mine, Optimax was "sparkly" (never Christmas tree though), and Ultimate quietened it substantially. However, Ultimate + Millers allowed the boost to go up a further 2psi (UK MY00, H&S SON DP, OEM centre, H&S silencer, K&N panel filter, Dawes ~18psi). I wonder if the added richness/retarded ignition of the AE802 makes the difference...?
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 04:26 PM
  #21  
ZIPPY's Avatar
ZIPPY
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,780
Likes: 0
Default

I read somwhere that Optimax was tested straight from the pump and was showing 97.2 RON and after 3 days in the tank it had dropped down to 95 RON.
Now ask yourself how long does it sit in the petrol station tank before you buy it and then how long is it in your car for (Subaru's not very long).

By law Optimax only has to be 95 RON when its sold it may well leave the refinery as 98 but it only has to be upto 95 Ron @ point of sale.
It makes me wonder as my MY01 ran good on some tanks of Optimax and bad on others.

Zippy
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 04:35 PM
  #22  
SamUK's Avatar
SamUK
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,507
Likes: 1
From: London
Angry

Hmm....Intresting...!!

Can this be true...I mean i have had good and Bad days of Optimax!


May consider switching to Super Unleaded.....
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 04:44 PM
  #23  
The_Judge's Avatar
The_Judge
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 0
From: Out of darkness cometh light
Default

Is there any similar research into BP Ultimate...?
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 04:46 PM
  #24  
nom's Avatar
nom
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,602
Likes: 0
Default

In the 4,000-5,000 rpm range (the sparkly bit on my car)...
Taking Optimax (from a low turnover garage - makes a big difference with Opti!) I have to remove 2 degrees to prevent occassional det with Esso SUL, but have found Esso to be very reliable (ie identical from tank to tank), and 5 degrees with 'Ultimately Pants' to stop det. What's more, the BP stuff appears extremely variable - sometimes it'll take more, usually it won't. A bit of a nightmare if you ask me... I think I'd prefer to put in NUL & wop in loads of additives than use that stuff!
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2004 | 09:23 AM
  #25  
SamUK's Avatar
SamUK
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,507
Likes: 1
From: London
Post

Have been recomended to use a can of octane boost on every tank full. It lasts longer and doesn’t deteriorate as fast as optimax ron does.

Intresting.....
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2004 | 11:08 AM
  #26  
nom's Avatar
nom
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,602
Likes: 0
Default

'Home-added' booster will deteriorate, though
The most 'reliable' way of knowing the RON you are getting is sticking to boggo SUL. That should barely deteriorate at all. But that only helps if you can map your car to suit it

If it is of any interest to anyone, I have found (by measuring engine 'noise level' rather than guessing ) that Optimax does deteriorate over time - I have taken a month to get through a tank in the past as I don't use the car every day - but it only effectively lowers itself to a RON level I'd say equivalent to slightly above Esso, the best of the SULs if you ask me; i.e., it doesn't drop below ~97 RON.

Which, in my books, even with its shortcomings, makes it the best 'off the shelf' fuel, if a little variable
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2004 | 03:01 PM
  #27  
STi wanna Subaru's Avatar
STi wanna Subaru
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 16,517
Likes: 0
From: Yorkshire
Default

correct me if I'm wrong but I believe SUL has to be 97RON to achieve the BS. Optimax however is not sold as a Super Unleaded and therefore does not have to comply with the BS. Optimax is a 95RON fuel made up to 98.6 RON using addatives.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2004 | 04:32 PM
  #28  
cinders's Avatar
cinders
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by STi wanna Subaru
correct me if I'm wrong but I believe SUL has to be 97RON to achieve the BS. Optimax however is not sold as a Super Unleaded and therefore does not have to comply with the BS. Optimax is a 95RON fuel made up to 98.6 RON using addatives.

So really you're probably best of using normal unleaded 95 ron and using an octane booster to raise it to 98+ ???

How much is octane booster and how much do you have to use?

Is it cheaper to use normal 95 leaded + octane booster than Optimax?...

Matt.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2004 | 04:37 PM
  #29  
STi wanna Subaru's Avatar
STi wanna Subaru
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 16,517
Likes: 0
From: Yorkshire
Default

Originally Posted by cinders
So really you're probably best of using normal unleaded 95 ron and using an octane booster to raise it to 98+ ???

How much is octane booster and how much do you have to use?

Is it cheaper to use normal 95 leaded + octane booster than Optimax?...

Matt.
I wouldn't say that. Other know a lot more than I. That was just my understanding
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2004 | 04:41 PM
  #30  
cinders's Avatar
cinders
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
Default

I think the best way of testing is to simply fit a knocklink and try different fuels and see how much it lights up.

Personally I don't trust the stuff that comes out of the pumps, hell they could put what they like in them, mix them up, who knows?...

At the moment I use Optimax from a local garage and the car seems fine - think I'm gonna by myself a Knocklink!
Reply



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:16 AM.