Transmission losses
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Grimsby
Posts: 7,961
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Have seen a dyno printout of a WRX with 320bhp from the engine and 220bhp at the wheels.
Can this be right???
That is 100bhp loss through the transmission. That is horrendous, a lot of cars only produce 50bhp so how do they even move?
I am sure that I must have got the wrong end of the stick, so somebody please enlighten me.
If it is the 4wd, then is ir realy worth it?
A rwd scooby, now that would be fun!
Can this be right???
That is 100bhp loss through the transmission. That is horrendous, a lot of cars only produce 50bhp so how do they even move?
I am sure that I must have got the wrong end of the stick, so somebody please enlighten me.
If it is the 4wd, then is ir realy worth it?
A rwd scooby, now that would be fun!
#2
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: North Yorks.
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That works out at about a 32% transmission loss. I think that sounds too high, but I don't know what it should be. Fwd and Rwd cars are about 12-15% so I'd have though a 4wheel drive would be under 30%. but who knows?
#5
Mine is 220bhp and 165bhp at the wheels and that's with a Haldex 4x4 system (Skoda)that's less power sapping than a permanent Subaru set up. It certainly uses a lot less fuel for similar power to the Impreza.
Trending Topics
#10
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Under your bonnet
Posts: 9,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Coastdown drag if your being picky was 89 BHP on my UK 00MY I have seen many around this figure and some at 100 BHP.
I would assume the figure would be less with a lighter flywheel ??
Andy
I would assume the figure would be less with a lighter flywheel ??
Andy
#13
Say you have a car that develops 200bhp at peak power and say transmission losses are 25%. You will have 150bhp at the wheels. At 2000rpm and part throttle lets say engine power is 50bhp, PAW would be 37.5bhp. If transmission losses were fixed (at 50bhp) you wouldn't move
To measure transmission loss there has to be an input into the transmission for the transmission (i e everything between the flywheel and road) to lose Rolling roads measure transmission losses with the engine disconnected (car is in neutral). So whatever is being measured/recorded is not true transmission loss.
To measure transmission loss there has to be an input into the transmission for the transmission (i e everything between the flywheel and road) to lose Rolling roads measure transmission losses with the engine disconnected (car is in neutral). So whatever is being measured/recorded is not true transmission loss.
#14
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Grimsby
Posts: 7,961
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks guys.
I get it now.
It seems to be diminishing returns from power gains over 200bhp on that system. Guess thats why they give such poor fuel economy!
Mark
I get it now.
It seems to be diminishing returns from power gains over 200bhp on that system. Guess thats why they give such poor fuel economy!
Mark
#15
Jusb wrote:
explain this then
note two overlaid graphs done at different times of year with different mods and still the drag shows within 1 BHP of each other.
Andy
but i reackon its no more than 60 bhp loss
too many exgarationists fantasisers on this forum
too many exgarationists fantasisers on this forum
note two overlaid graphs done at different times of year with different mods and still the drag shows within 1 BHP of each other.
Andy
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post