Notices

Fuel types

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25 November 2002, 05:19 PM
  #1  
Tasp
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Tasp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

Currently using Optimax fuel having read EVO a few months back. What do other people think to this/any alternatives/better fuels?
Old 26 November 2002, 09:36 AM
  #2  
Gez
Scooby Regular
 
Gez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Im currently using Optimax on my scoob but have found that over a short period of time ie 1-2 weeks the car runs rougher. Once its filled up again it runs ok. I did find out that Optimax is ACTUALLY 95RON + additives. It is actually quite naughty of Shell to sell 95RON at 97RON prices. Anyway, whatever the RON rating may be on Optimax it still allowed Bob RAwle a few degrees more advance over Super Unleaded, so whatever the additives are, they are doing their job quite well.

Cheers

Gez
Old 26 November 2002, 04:35 PM
  #3  
ROCKETMAN
Scooby Newbie
 
ROCKETMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Gez, how did you find that Shell are using Additives to get the rating up to 98+?
Old 27 November 2002, 12:46 PM
  #4  
Jeff Clarke
Scooby Regular
 
Jeff Clarke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Been using Shell Optimax in two V twin bikes and experienced instant smoother running especially from cold. Same results as soon as it went into the Scoob. No noticeable performance improvements other than that I'm afraid. Quite a bit more expensive than Regular if you do lots of miles.
Old 28 November 2002, 12:47 PM
  #5  
Gez
Scooby Regular
 
Gez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Rocketman,
I found out about Optimax and the additives from a very reliable and well respected source who posts on Scoobynet. I think this is the reason why Shell dont advertise the RON rating on the pumps AND why the only approximate on their website of Optimax being over 98 ron. The best thng to do is to put a bit of Optimax at a time and dont leave it in the tank for too long as it degrades. Im not slagging the stuff because when my LINK ecu was being mapped, it managed more advance than SUL.

Cheers

Gez
Old 28 November 2002, 12:53 PM
  #6  
Gez
Scooby Regular
 
Gez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Rocketman,
I found out about Optimax and the additives from a very reliable and well respected source who posts on Scoobynet. I think this is the reason why Shell dont advertise the RON rating on the pumps AND why the only approximate on their website of Optimax being over 98 ron. The best thng to do is to put a bit of Optimax at a time and dont leave it in the tank for too long as it degrades. Im not slagging the stuff because when my LINK ecu was being mapped, it managed more advance than SUL.

Cheers

Gez
Old 28 November 2002, 05:57 PM
  #7  
Mungo
Scooby Regular
 
Mungo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: West Byfleet, Surrey
Posts: 1,653
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation

I had been using Optimax as a "cheap" SUL alternative, especially as it's allegedly 98.1 RON.
However, I recently had to fill up with Esso SUL (97 RON) and have noticed that the car is pulling much more strongly; better torque lower down, less hesitation, runs better when cold, and seems to accelerate all the way to 7000.
I'm sticking with the Esso, especially as it's only 77.9 against 74.9 for NUL.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KAS35RSTI
Subaru
27
04 November 2021 07:12 PM
Ganz1983
Subaru
5
02 October 2015 09:22 AM
makkink
General Technical
10
01 October 2015 05:41 PM
yabbadoo4
ScoobyNet General
11
30 September 2015 10:33 PM
IAN WR1
ScoobyNet General
8
28 September 2015 08:14 PM



Quick Reply: Fuel types



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:34 PM.