Notices

2.1 or 2.5 engine

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09 October 2018, 12:23 PM
  #1  
rsjohn
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
rsjohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,031
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 2.1 or 2.5 engine

Probably been asked before but hey ho.

So im looking at uprating the engine in my impreza sti widetrack and iv seen a few engine options, 2.0, 2.1, 2.35, 2.5, theres probably more but the main ones iv seen.

Iv seen a couple of engines for sale a 2.1 which is built to a good spec and a 2.5 again built to a good spec.

The 2.5 is alot more ££ than the 2.1.

My aim is to get a quick road car and maybe the odd track day in the future and looking for around 480-500bhp

So which would be better the 2.1 or the 2.5?

thanks
Old 09 October 2018, 02:13 PM
  #2  
hackisfun
Scooby Regular
 
hackisfun's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Newtownards - Northern Ireland
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

The best thing to do would be list the relevant spec and prices of the engine options you are looking at. Parts used will be a big factor on reliability etc.


the 2.5 will have more torque over the 2.1
Old 09 October 2018, 04:39 PM
  #3  
ScottyPPP
Scooby Regular
 
ScottyPPP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 1,497
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

The 2.5 will have much better spool and pick up over a 2.1
Old 09 October 2018, 04:46 PM
  #4  
rsjohn
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
rsjohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,031
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ScottyPPP
The 2.5 will have much better spool and pick up over a 2.1
What turbo did you run on your 2.1?
Old 09 October 2018, 04:48 PM
  #5  
ScottyPPP
Scooby Regular
 
ScottyPPP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 1,497
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rsjohn
What turbo did you run on your 2.1?
Biggest I had on it was a 20G at 380bhp.
Old 09 October 2018, 07:08 PM
  #6  
bustaMOVEs
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (31)
 
bustaMOVEs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The 2dr club
Posts: 12,979
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

A 2.1 cdb has gotta be the reliable one with quality parts of course, 2.5 cd inserts are reliable upto a certain bhp because of thin liners, a 2.35 using a 22t block is great and a in between of both but at a great cost also but the best choice for big power builds.
take your pick in what you want, any 3 will be fine at your level but needs to be a good build with good parts for reliability
Old 09 October 2018, 11:32 PM
  #7  
rsjohn
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
rsjohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,031
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

This any good, it’s a 2.1?

Ej20 semi closed deck block

Group n arrow billet crankshaft

Group n arrow Conrod’s

ACL race bearings

Omega group n pistons

RCM 14mm head stud conversion

Spec c big port heads with oem spec c cams

Uprated valves and spings

RCM 12mm modified oil pump

Group n Twinscroll baffled sump

Old 10 October 2018, 05:59 PM
  #8  
bustaMOVEs
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (31)
 
bustaMOVEs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The 2dr club
Posts: 12,979
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Thats a very good spec, but I don’t understand why spend so much on a arrow crank and use a scd?
get a recipt for that build to confirm
Old 10 October 2018, 06:18 PM
  #9  
rsjohn
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
rsjohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,031
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bustaMOVEs
Thats a very good spec, but I don’t understand why spend so much on a arrow crank and use a scd?
get a recipt for that build to confirm
Chevron built the engine
Old 10 October 2018, 07:32 PM
  #10  
the shreksta
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (20)
 
the shreksta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: hinckley
Posts: 8,445
Received 495 Likes on 339 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bustaMOVEs
Thats a very good spec, but I don’t understand why spend so much on a arrow crank and use a scd?
get a recipt for that build to confirm
same.....

i thought the standard subaru crank was good for 600-700 bhp so see no reason to pay ££££ for a billet one
Old 10 October 2018, 09:40 PM
  #11  
bustaMOVEs
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (31)
 
bustaMOVEs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The 2dr club
Posts: 12,979
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

My issue is, pay upwards of 2-3k for a arrow crank but yet use a scdb? The arrow crank can take some serious rpm!
the rest of the build is more than perfect though
Old 10 October 2018, 10:06 PM
  #12  
rsjohn
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
rsjohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,031
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bustaMOVEs
Thats a very good spec, but I don’t understand why spend so much on a arrow crank and use a scd?
get a recipt for that build to confirm
Originally Posted by the shreksta
same.....

i thought the standard subaru crank was good for 600-700 bhp so see no reason to pay ££££ for a billet one
Originally Posted by bustaMOVEs
My issue is, pay upwards of 2-3k for a arrow crank but yet use a scdb? The arrow crank can take some serious rpm!
the rest of the build is more than perfect though
iv not paid that for it so Iv gained a very good spec engine for less £££
Old 10 October 2018, 11:35 PM
  #13  
scoobypaul_temp
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
scoobypaul_temp's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: milk n beans
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rsjohn

iv not paid that for it so Iv gained a very good spec engine for less £££
You haven't paid for it - but the point being made is that it doesn't match the rest of the build. But, if you got it at a good price, and don't push it too far, bargain
Old 11 October 2018, 06:21 AM
  #14  
domino46
Scooby Regular
 
domino46's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: www.bbscoobys.com
Posts: 3,179
Received 264 Likes on 172 Posts
Default

had both the 2.1 and my current 2.5 ,,, prefer the 2.5 for the road ,, 2.1 for the track
Old 11 October 2018, 06:49 PM
  #15  
bustaMOVEs
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (31)
 
bustaMOVEs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The 2dr club
Posts: 12,979
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by scoobypaul_temp
You haven't paid for it - but the point being made is that it doesn't match the rest of the build. But, if you got it at a good price, and don't push it too far, bargain
this.
p.s I'd want proof of that billet crank as that's a lot of pee. And pics of build from seller?
Old 14 October 2018, 07:43 AM
  #16  
k_duraman
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
k_duraman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: where there are no gatsos and no speed limits
Posts: 765
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

if built propperly , a 2,5 will be better on every aspect. it will have better torque and earlier spool. that spec you have given for the 2.1 is over kill regarding the crank and the oil pump. both the crank and the oil pump would be a good investment if you want to achive 700+bhp at some point but want to hang around at 450bhp mark for a while. but then you wouldn't take a semi cd as your base (scd runs out of breath after 550ish bhp). also there is the 14mm stud issue for me. i dont have experience building a big hp 2 liter so not sure about clearances but on a 2.5 semi cd it would be a big no no for me to put 14mm studs as they touch the liners and thin the liners down. if when they drill bigger holes (for the 14mm studs) on a 2 liter block and touch the liners you could easily crack a cylinder wall. i beleive the arrow crank, 12mm rcm oil pump and the 14mm studs belong to a cdb or even a sleeved block aiming for at least 700+ bhp. you dont put an arrow crank in your engine for 450 bhp. it is like giving a gold plated barbie doll to your 3 year old.
Old 14 October 2018, 09:04 AM
  #17  
the shreksta
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (20)
 
the shreksta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: hinckley
Posts: 8,445
Received 495 Likes on 339 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by k_duraman
if built propperly , a 2,5 will be better on every aspect. it will have better torque and earlier spool. that spec you have given for the 2.1 is over kill regarding the crank and the oil pump. both the crank and the oil pump would be a good investment if you want to achive 700+bhp at some point but want to hang around at 450bhp mark for a while. but then you wouldn't take a semi cd as your base (scd runs out of breath after 550ish bhp). also there is the 14mm stud issue for me. i dont have experience building a big hp 2 liter so not sure about clearances but on a 2.5 semi cd it would be a big no no for me to put 14mm studs as they touch the liners and thin the liners down. if when they drill bigger holes (for the 14mm studs) on a 2 liter block and touch the liners you could easily crack a cylinder wall. i beleive the arrow crank, 12mm rcm oil pump and the 14mm studs belong to a cdb or even a sleeved block aiming for at least 700+ bhp. you dont put an arrow crank in your engine for 450 bhp. it is like giving a gold plated barbie doll to your 3 year old.
how come so many engine builders recommend 14mm head studs then? only 1 place i have spoken to said they are not needed and that an extreme version of the 11mm will be more than enough.

Old 14 October 2018, 05:07 PM
  #18  
bustaMOVEs
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (31)
 
bustaMOVEs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The 2dr club
Posts: 12,979
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

I'm with k duraman 100% there, apart from the 2.5 better in every aspect (not as good as a 2.1 cdb on track when at extreme temps the 2.5 liners will be weaker and could crack etc)

amd yes 11 extreme are fine for most applications, shrek, most say 14 as it's probably sounds safer for the customer lol. What folk tell you take with a pinch of salt and figure the wider picture out yourself and go from there on what's suitable and what's not.

Last edited by bustaMOVEs; 14 October 2018 at 05:08 PM.
Old 14 October 2018, 06:50 PM
  #19  
the shreksta
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (20)
 
the shreksta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: hinckley
Posts: 8,445
Received 495 Likes on 339 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bustaMOVEs
I'm with k duraman 100% there, apart from the 2.5 better in every aspect (not as good as a 2.1 cdb on track when at extreme temps the 2.5 liners will be weaker and could crack etc)

amd yes 11 extreme are fine for most applications, shrek, most say 14 as it's probably sounds safer for the customer lol. What folk tell you take with a pinch of salt and figure the wider picture out yourself and go from there on what's suitable and what's not.
really dont know which way to turn now lol
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LeighJ
Drivetrain
3
22 August 2002 04:39 PM
highlander
Drivetrain
1
03 April 2002 01:24 PM
Markus
Drivetrain
14
01 August 2001 02:09 PM
mcalvey
ScoobyNet General
5
15 June 2001 01:38 AM
MorayMackenzie
Drivetrain
9
11 March 2000 12:23 AM



Quick Reply: 2.1 or 2.5 engine



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:05 PM.