Notices

VF41 Vs SC36 on a 2.5 FSTI

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05 March 2015, 03:50 PM
  #1  
theshootist
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
 
theshootist's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: London
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default VF41 Vs SC36 on a 2.5 FSTI

I would be very interested if any members could give me an opinion on the above two turbos.

I have two Foresters.

The first a 2005 XT which I have modified to around 300hp using an SC36 turbo. Spool up and top end are great with this turbo, I love it. The softer cams on the 2005 2.5 XT mean that it will never get to the power that the turbo was designed for though.

I've also recently bought a Forester STI which has the VF41 turbo. Im intending on building this car up to be a bit faster. I'll keep both cars in the short term, my original XT isn't worth much now anyway!

The question is whether its worth the time and money to swap the turbos over. Would the SC36 be a better turbo than the standard VF41 on the FSTI? I know from the forester forum that the FSTI is capable of 330 to 360hp on its original turbo, so there may be no point.

What would members expect the STI 2.5 engine to produce with the SC36 and would it be worth it? I'll be fitting an HKS exhaust system and larger Hyperflow TMIC.

Thanks
Old 05 March 2015, 03:58 PM
  #2  
Maz
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (34)
 
Maz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Yorkshire.
Posts: 15,884
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Personally for what you'd gain I'd say it's not worth it. Better to opt for the 40 or 42 as they'll see you north of 400bhp. Bear in mind you'll need to upgrade the fuelling and I'd go front mount too. Plus you've got the dreaded 2.5 issue too.
Old 05 March 2015, 04:15 PM
  #3  
theshootist
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
 
theshootist's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: London
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yes, there is a limit to how far I dare go! I went with the SC36 on the XT because its still give the lower down spool up of a smaller turbo. Whatever the FSTI ends up with its got to be a felxible, tractable engine. No point having all top end power, its a forester after all!

If I got the car to 360+hp then I would be very happy. Those numbers are enough for me.
Old 05 March 2015, 04:30 PM
  #4  
Maz
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (34)
 
Maz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Yorkshire.
Posts: 15,884
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by theshootist
Yes, there is a limit to how far I dare go! I went with the SC36 on the XT because its still give the lower down spool up of a smaller turbo. Whatever the FSTI ends up with its got to be a felxible, tractable engine. No point having all top end power, its a forester after all!

If I got the car to 360+hp then I would be very happy. Those numbers are enough for me.
I'm sure with the right mods your vf41 will get close to 360 plus a fair wedge of torque.
Old 06 March 2015, 06:42 AM
  #5  
theshootist
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
 
theshootist's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: London
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks, the more I read the more I think the swap is not worth it. I'm thinking I'll leave both turbos where they are and either be satisfied with the vf41 at its max or find a larger turbo.
Old 07 March 2015, 08:07 AM
  #6  
imprezagaz
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
imprezagaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Grimsby
Posts: 1,147
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

My previous classic was a 2.5 with a sc36 on and with supporting mods was maxed out at 354/350
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Scott@ScoobySpares
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
55
05 August 2018 07:02 AM
Tarling
Subaru Parts
10
19 October 2015 07:58 PM
sedge69
Wanted
0
01 October 2015 09:44 PM
IanG1983
Subaru Parts
1
30 September 2015 04:52 PM
scoobiesteve103
ScoobyNet General
10
21 September 2015 09:33 AM



Quick Reply: VF41 Vs SC36 on a 2.5 FSTI



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:56 AM.