Went to Surrey Rolling Road today ...
28 February 2007, 08:20 PM
#1
Owner of SNet
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 11,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Went to Surrey Rolling Road today ...
... have a guess what power (bhp & ft2 torque) I've got.
Car is to the left & is a standard JDM STi Spec C ie as it rolled off the boat. No remaps etc. Totally standard at the mo. Use Tesco 99 to fill up, doesn't seem to misfire
TX.
Car is to the left & is a standard JDM STi Spec C ie as it rolled off the boat. No remaps etc. Totally standard at the mo. Use Tesco 99 to fill up, doesn't seem to misfire
TX.
Trending Topics
28 February 2007, 09:12 PM
#8
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Basingstoke, Hants
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
come on then man tell us! i guess 335bhp 
charlie at surrey rolling road is a top bloak im sure you would agree!had my v6 ra there last sat made 371bhp booked in again for monday for a tweak by pat as i am fitting tubular headers this weekend, any one thinking of checking there cars health would recormend them!good prices too!
charlie at surrey rolling road is a top bloak im sure you would agree!had my v6 ra there last sat made 371bhp booked in again for monday for a tweak by pat as i am fitting tubular headers this weekend, any one thinking of checking there cars health would recormend them!good prices too!
28 February 2007, 09:39 PM
#10
Owner of SNet
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 11,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OK here we go (I'll post the graphs when I can get them scanned in):
298hp (294bhp) @ 6500rpm with at least 280hp between 5000rpm & 7500rpm.
298ft2/torque @ 4750rpm.
1.4 bar of boost @ 4500rpm.
233hp (230bhp) at the wheels.
Charlie did say it was "over fueling"? Perhaps that's why the power is down
TX.
298hp (294bhp) @ 6500rpm with at least 280hp between 5000rpm & 7500rpm.
298ft2/torque @ 4750rpm.
1.4 bar of boost @ 4500rpm.
233hp (230bhp) at the wheels.
Charlie did say it was "over fueling"? Perhaps that's why the power is down
TX.
28 February 2007, 09:58 PM
#13
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: workshop tel: 01787 275074
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
28 February 2007, 10:01 PM
#15
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Are you still ok for next Monday AM when I'm booked in? I have got the day off work so no need to drive me back to Harlow.
Thanks
Russ (2003 wrx)
28 February 2007, 10:02 PM
#16
Owner of SNet
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 11,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Russell.
Only 50 notes which = VFM in my book. Charlie rattled through it talking non stop so was pretty informative too.
Mocom - I assumed power was down as the guesses were around 310-320bhp. Charlie also guessed that it would be 310bhp ish before the run.
Only 50 notes which = VFM in my book. Charlie rattled through it talking non stop so was pretty informative too.
Mocom - I assumed power was down as the guesses were around 310-320bhp. Charlie also guessed that it would be 310bhp ish before the run.
28 February 2007, 11:15 PM
#20
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Manchester
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
300bhp/300ltb thats bang on the button.
With them being lightweight people tend say 330bhp/330ltb instead of.....
"it's 300bhp/300ltb but it weight's 100kg lighter then an sti so equals 330ish" as you can see the 2nd option is a little long winded hence the nice and short 330/330
Bring on bob rawle thats all i can say
PCM
With them being lightweight people tend say 330bhp/330ltb instead of.....
"it's 300bhp/300ltb but it weight's 100kg lighter then an sti so equals 330ish" as you can see the 2nd option is a little long winded hence the nice and short 330/330
Bring on bob rawle thats all i can say
PCM
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
shorty87
Wheels And Tyres For Sale
0
25 September 2015 08:36 PM