Notices
Drivetrain Gearbox, Diffs & Driveshafts etc

reducing drivetrain losses

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30 January 2007, 11:58 PM
  #1  
ScoobyDoo69
Scooby Senior
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
ScoobyDoo69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: WMI
Posts: 5,143
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Post reducing drivetrain losses

Ok, bit of a weird one, and possibly quite a hefty subject to ask about, but what the heck !

How can you reduce drivetrain losses? Or allow the car to pull easier above 80mph without going for more power mods?

Initial thoughts of mine were:

Lightened flywheel and pulley sets
lightweight alloys
light propshaft - something maybe half the weight?

Would any of this "aid" in getting the power down to the road better due to less resistance as such? It was just a random thought of mine, as I'm pretty sure a 230bhp FWD car would keep with a 300bhp Scooby after say 80mph, or there would be very little in it. So any ideas folks?

Regards

ScoobyDoo69
Old 31 January 2007, 12:43 AM
  #2  
34srm
Scooby Regular
 
34srm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 871
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

think your barking up the wrong tree, maybe 230bhp fwd is about the same past 80mph as 300bhp scooby but only on the straight (motorway for example) around the streets and off the mark my money on the scooby even with less bhp , fwd with 230bhp is always gonna be struggling for grip
Old 31 January 2007, 08:41 AM
  #3  
ScoobyDoo69
Scooby Senior
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
ScoobyDoo69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: WMI
Posts: 5,143
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Default

barking up the wrong tree? lol
I'm not actually, I'm mearly talking about straightline acceleration, off the mark rarely happens in the real world.
Old 31 January 2007, 12:53 PM
  #4  
34srm
Scooby Regular
 
34srm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 871
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the barking up the wrong tree was about the lighter flywheel/prop etc , for the effort performace differance would be very hard to see on its own
Old 31 January 2007, 03:18 PM
  #5  
D1CCY
Scooby Regular
 
D1CCY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: East Yorkshire
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Trouble is that there is inherently a lot of frictional loss in a 4wd system. Good lubricants may help a little.
Old 31 January 2007, 04:01 PM
  #6  
Stuart Page
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Stuart Page's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: MK
Posts: 852
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Reduce rotating mass, i.e. wheels, discs, prop, driveshafts, flywheel, crankpulley... it all helps the response! Probably most cost effective to have more power though!
Old 31 January 2007, 04:05 PM
  #7  
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
john banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

A 230 BHP FWD car with similar weight and aero will not stick with a 300 BHP AWD car. The losses on many rolling roads are grossly exaggerated and are due to tyre deformation and double contact patches.

Based on accelerometer testing a 300 BHP Scooby probably puts about 250 WHP, and a 230 BHP FWD car about 200 WHP.
Old 01 February 2007, 01:15 PM
  #8  
Jay m A
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Jay m A's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Class record holder at Pembrey Llandow Goodwood MIRA Hethel Blyton Curborough Lydden and Snetterton
Posts: 8,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just to add to the debate..

Things like lightened flywheels, pullies, wheels etc take some inertia out of the drivetrian, so will aid response / acceleration - but will it reduce drivetrain losses? I don't think so. The way I see it is the losses is the energy lost through noise and heat, caused by friction of gear teeth, bearings, oil etc.

So a car at a certain rpm at a certain speed will have the same drivetrain losses - i.e. PAW irrespective of lightened components, however the car with the lightened components should get to that speed quicker.

Bang for buck though I think its more cost effective to raise the power rather than reduce drivetrain inertia - a carbon prop is usually last on the list
Old 01 February 2007, 01:49 PM
  #9  
Slowboy Racing
Former Sponsor
 
Slowboy Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: 10.68 QT mile in 2007 2.33 Type R ** Current 2002 Spec C 2.33 Track prepped.
Posts: 1,658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok so what you are saying is also light pistons, hollow cams, light rods all make no difference in reducing the loss of power due to the resistance of Centrifugal force?

So why make the motor light ?

The same principle applys, if you pick up a brick with a meassuered force and with the same force you pick up a lighter brick the time it takes will be less to reach the same point, but you will also use less energy doing so……..

The idear of two cars traveling the same speed one with lightend “Bits” and the other without having the same drivetran loses yes, but as you said the car with the light bits will be able to make up that speed quicker. So surley from what you have said it is a benefit to do this and that benefit comes from increased power due to the light “Bits” reducing the amount of energy lost. Or am I missing something?
Old 01 February 2007, 01:59 PM
  #10  
34srm
Scooby Regular
 
34srm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 871
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yeah think you are missing it lighter may be quicker but lets face it a mildly tuned scoob would be quicker than the car thats lost abit ov weight and wots with the bold print is that you raising your voice in text
Old 01 February 2007, 03:50 PM
  #11  
Slowboy Racing
Former Sponsor
 
Slowboy Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: 10.68 QT mile in 2007 2.33 Type R ** Current 2002 Spec C 2.33 Track prepped.
Posts: 1,658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

No i am not raising my voice , i didnt realise the text was that large !
Old 01 February 2007, 04:47 PM
  #12  
New_scooby_04
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
New_scooby_04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by john banks
A 230 BHP FWD car with similar weight and aero will not stick with a 300 BHP AWD car. The losses on many rolling roads are grossly exaggerated and are due to tyre deformation and double contact patches.

Based on accelerometer testing a 300 BHP Scooby probably puts about 250 WHP, and a 230 BHP FWD car about 200 WHP.
Indeed.

In my experience, transmission loss difference between 4WD and FWD don't count for nearly as much as some would have you to believe on the road.

The critical bit being the "on the road" part.

Ns04
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FuZzBoM
Wheels, Tyres & Brakes
16
04 October 2015 09:49 PM
the shreksta
General Technical
27
02 October 2015 03:20 PM
InTurbo
ScoobyNet General
21
30 September 2015 08:59 PM
aaron_ions
General Technical
1
17 September 2015 10:42 AM
Darren1970
General Technical
0
07 September 2015 10:50 PM



Quick Reply: reducing drivetrain losses



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:17 AM.