What Bore pipe 4 FMIC Project ??????
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,808
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What Bore pipe 4 FMIC Project ??????
I am just gathering bits together to fit an FMIC to my Uk 94 which has a TD05 Turbo.
Current Mods (engine side)
Walbro Fuel Pump (optimax & Octane booster always)
Full Decat
Blitz Induction
Gruppe-s headers & uppipe
Prodrive Ecu
Manual Boost Controller 17 ish Psi
Samco Hoses Etc
Last R & R John Nobles 311 Bhp & 272 Ft/Lb
Pipe work is going to be Home made as such I can go to 3" Max (Pipe bender won't handle bigger)
Would 2 " be better for spool Up ?? Or for the loss of spool up time 3" would be more beneficial... Comments appreciated ,Thanks
Dean
Current Mods (engine side)
Walbro Fuel Pump (optimax & Octane booster always)
Full Decat
Blitz Induction
Gruppe-s headers & uppipe
Prodrive Ecu
Manual Boost Controller 17 ish Psi
Samco Hoses Etc
Last R & R John Nobles 311 Bhp & 272 Ft/Lb
Pipe work is going to be Home made as such I can go to 3" Max (Pipe bender won't handle bigger)
Would 2 " be better for spool Up ?? Or for the loss of spool up time 3" would be more beneficial... Comments appreciated ,Thanks
Dean
#5
DeanF:
I'm very interested in this topic too. I did some research about this, trying to find some valuable information. If you read the book "Maximum boost" from Corky Bell, there is a chapter about intercooling.
Mr. Bell say something about the drag losses in a pipe and this increase "too much" over 0.4 mach. If you make some calculations for a 2 litre engine with 20 psi taking in account this information, you'll see it's possible have a 2.25" pipe diameter without restrictions (If my memory is good, aprox 2.17" is the minimum). Why this? As the pipe diameters decreases, the air speed increase and you must try to keep the less volume to fill in order to have less lag.
I don't remember the exact numbers and formulas, but I'll post later when I have the book in my hands
Regards from Chile
I'm very interested in this topic too. I did some research about this, trying to find some valuable information. If you read the book "Maximum boost" from Corky Bell, there is a chapter about intercooling.
Mr. Bell say something about the drag losses in a pipe and this increase "too much" over 0.4 mach. If you make some calculations for a 2 litre engine with 20 psi taking in account this information, you'll see it's possible have a 2.25" pipe diameter without restrictions (If my memory is good, aprox 2.17" is the minimum). Why this? As the pipe diameters decreases, the air speed increase and you must try to keep the less volume to fill in order to have less lag.
I don't remember the exact numbers and formulas, but I'll post later when I have the book in my hands
Regards from Chile
#6
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,808
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fredysan,
That makes sense, I did not just want to bend & fit the pipe work regardless, Wanted to get the Flow & spool up as optimal as possible,
Thanks for the Info & i'll look forward to the rest
Dean
That makes sense, I did not just want to bend & fit the pipe work regardless, Wanted to get the Flow & spool up as optimal as possible,
Thanks for the Info & i'll look forward to the rest
Dean
#7
Now I have the information...
Mr Bell say the maximum airflow speed shouldn't be over 0.4 mach or 450 ft/min because over this "magic" number the looses increases a lot. At the other side, the diameter of the pipes should be the keep at the minimum possible to have the less volume to fill, hence less lag.
So:
Speed = Airflow/ area
Let's assume our airflow at 20 psi in our 2.0 lts engine is 587 cfm with 100% of VE (The maximum possible).
Now
450 ft/seg > 587 ft´3/min / pi X (d/2)´2
Regarding Pi's and constants.. we have:
Speed = 587 X 3.055 / d(inch)´2
Speed= 587 X 3.055 / 2.5´2 = 283 ft/sec
Let's try with a 2.25 diameter pipe
Speed = 587 X 3.055 / 2.25´2 = 354 ft/sec
But, What about the volume to fill:
V1= pipe lenght X Area = Plengt X Pi X (2.5/2)´2
V2= pipe lenght X Area = Plengt X Pi X (2.25/2)´2
so V1/V2 = 1.5625/1.2656 = 1.23
23% more volume to fill
Now the interesting thing is see How long it will take fill this volume:
Time = V/ flow rate
If some one do this math, could be interesting... I got tired now...
Regards from Chile
Mr Bell say the maximum airflow speed shouldn't be over 0.4 mach or 450 ft/min because over this "magic" number the looses increases a lot. At the other side, the diameter of the pipes should be the keep at the minimum possible to have the less volume to fill, hence less lag.
So:
Speed = Airflow/ area
Let's assume our airflow at 20 psi in our 2.0 lts engine is 587 cfm with 100% of VE (The maximum possible).
Now
450 ft/seg > 587 ft´3/min / pi X (d/2)´2
Regarding Pi's and constants.. we have:
Speed = 587 X 3.055 / d(inch)´2
Speed= 587 X 3.055 / 2.5´2 = 283 ft/sec
Let's try with a 2.25 diameter pipe
Speed = 587 X 3.055 / 2.25´2 = 354 ft/sec
But, What about the volume to fill:
V1= pipe lenght X Area = Plengt X Pi X (2.5/2)´2
V2= pipe lenght X Area = Plengt X Pi X (2.25/2)´2
so V1/V2 = 1.5625/1.2656 = 1.23
23% more volume to fill
Now the interesting thing is see How long it will take fill this volume:
Time = V/ flow rate
If some one do this math, could be interesting... I got tired now...
Regards from Chile
Trending Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
28 December 2015 11:07 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
18 November 2015 07:03 AM