Notices
Drivetrain Gearbox, Diffs & Driveshafts etc

Dynorun with Powerengineering exhaustmanifold

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31 January 2001, 11:47 AM
  #1  
turboke
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
turboke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

THE FACTS!
Car: Subaru Impreza MY98
Results:
-before (with Ramairfilter and scoobysport backbox): 248Lbft/ 3670 rpm and 173.7 kW/ 5860 rpm
-now (scoobysport backbox, standard airfilter, Powerengineering exhaust manifold
Old 02 February 2001, 12:19 AM
  #2  
turboke
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
turboke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

same dyno, other year...
on professional system with fault-compensation (bosch)

[This message has been edited by turboke (edited 02 February 2001).]
Old 02 February 2001, 07:54 AM
  #3  
dowser
Scooby Senior
 
dowser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Posts: 3,105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Turboke

Was it the same dyno, same day?

Thanks
Richard
Old 04 February 2001, 01:31 AM
  #4  
Mac's Power
Scooby Regular
 
Mac's Power's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Exhaust manifold definately gives more power but at the loss of the offbeat boxer sound

power or sound?? Hmmmmmmmm

Paul.
Old 04 February 2001, 02:19 PM
  #5  
Sith
Scooby Regular
 
Sith's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 2,706
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile


Sound.

P.
Old 04 February 2001, 06:16 PM
  #6  
MorayMackenzie
Scooby Senior
 
MorayMackenzie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 3,410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Has anyone reading tried the HKS tuned manifold? Apparently its less than a grand (before VAT?) and should make a bit of a difference to torque and top end power... Non-equal length, so it shouldn't kill the boxer note.
Old 04 February 2001, 06:19 PM
  #7  
Dave T-S
Scooby Regular
 
Dave T-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Newmarket Suffolk
Posts: 8,897
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Exclamation

I'm with Sith (in a manner of speaking M8 )
Old 04 February 2001, 10:07 PM
  #8  
Sith
Scooby Regular
 
Sith's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 2,706
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

LOL @ Dave.

P.
Old 23 June 2001, 01:20 AM
  #9  
StephenDone
Scooby Regular
 
StephenDone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I can concur with turboke's results. I've just had one fitted to my UK99MY.

I gained more than 30lbft of torque across the rev range.

The noise level inside the car is much reduced, though is more tinny. No more headache inducing throb from my full exhaust system. The engine tone is very smooth all the way to the rev limiter.

You can see my dyno run results at
Old 23 June 2001, 08:01 AM
  #10  
JIM THEO
Scooby Regular
 
JIM THEO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,833
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Without any problem (overboost etc) Stephen?
Old 23 June 2001, 08:14 AM
  #11  
JIM THEO
Scooby Regular
 
JIM THEO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,833
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

One more question: it works in combination with PPP (without any engine problem of course)? May be stupid question, but I am inexperienced in manifolds!
Old 25 June 2001, 05:08 PM
  #12  
JIM THEO
Scooby Regular
 
JIM THEO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,833
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy

Ok, it's a simple question... If an equal length exhaust manifold works with PPP, and if it produces overboost, detonation or any other engine problems. There is nobody to answer my question? Nobody? Thanks to all...
Old 25 June 2001, 05:24 PM
  #13  
steve McCulloch
Scooby Regular
 
steve McCulloch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

cripes - just seen the price of the PE manifold £1500 fitted roughly!

Has anyone had one fitted to an sti - Bob Rawle tried the BPM ones - but they did not work

May go down the HKS route - should save about £200 + should be able to get it fitted a lot cheaper than that!
Old 25 June 2001, 07:39 PM
  #14  
Deep Singh
Scooby Regular
 
Deep Singh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Can someone explain why it makes the exhaust note quieter.I'm sure I heard one and it was much louder.
Old 26 June 2001, 02:16 PM
  #15  
MorayMackenzie
Scooby Senior
 
MorayMackenzie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 3,410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Steve M.

I know of one car that has the MRT headers fitted (exhaust ports on manifold were matched to the heads during fitting) where it made a _BIG_ difference to the car... it needed a _lot_ more fuel added in the map because of the increase in efficiency... the exhaust note is different, but still boxer... I am seriously considering these headers for my rebuild.

Moray

Moray
Old 26 June 2001, 06:19 PM
  #16  
steve McCulloch
Scooby Regular
 
steve McCulloch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Hmmmm interesting

I may have to go that route.

I can see a big spend coming up once I'm back from a worrk stint in the States

Can I ask a question about your Motec?

Do you have to rev the engine at the start to get it going due to lack of 'choke control' - this is the only thing that is putting me off this? - Is it worth me bothering or should I stick with the Link? - you can answer off line if you wish


Old 03 July 2001, 03:37 PM
  #17  
StephenDone
Scooby Regular
 
StephenDone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Sorry for the delay in replying - I've been in the US.

My car peaked at 14.5 PSI of boost and held 13PSI. The guys at PE attached an OBD monitoring unit to the car during the run. The car was still running a healthy 10% CO, so the fuelling is nowhere near it limits yet. Retardation was also minimal, so the engine was not seeing any appreciable knock.

Boost is regulated by the ECU. The MAP & MAF sensors (Mainfold Absolute Pressure & Air Flow Sensors respectively) allow the ECU to do this regardless of the exhaust.

The Maxim Racing manifold from Power Engineering is the only _EQUAL-LENGTH_ product mentioned so far. The other version are not - 2 pipes are shorter than the others. Equal lengths equals better resonance - the exhaust gases are effectively sucked out of the cylinders at resonance - check the dyno runs on my site and look at the midrange torque.

The exhaust note is quieter because the pressure waves from each cylinder travel down the exhaust in an evenly distributed fashion. With a non-equal length manifold, the pressure waves collide at certain RPMs, hence the boominess. It really is much quieter! The exhaust nore is higher pitched, but less boomy. Perhaps the manifold makes a standard exhaust louder, since it damps the lower frequencies better, and you don't hear them anyway.

As for fitting to an STI, I have been told that the improvements are just as good for these higher spec cars. Speak to Mervin Carroll at Power Engineering - he dyno tests them all the time, and seriously impressed me with his knowledge.

Is PPP Prodrive Performance Pack ? If so...These upgrades only change the back box on the exhaust system, so fitting a manifold isn't going to involve removing any of your prior investment. Check with PE about performance, but I'm pretty sure you'll still get +20 BHP - I know it seems hard to believe, but it does work wonders.

Regs.

Steve
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
marcelgtt
Member's Gallery
44
20 January 2024 08:32 PM
parkus
ScoobyNet General
9
15 October 2013 06:26 PM
parkus
ScoobyNet General
5
19 August 2013 09:12 PM



Quick Reply: Dynorun with Powerengineering exhaustmanifold



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:19 AM.