Notices
Drivetrain Gearbox, Diffs & Driveshafts etc

Dissapointing power figures

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 13, 2003 | 07:23 PM
  #1  
DreXeL's Avatar
DreXeL
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,460
Likes: 0
From: Yate, Bristol
Post

MY97 UK, Full decat, Dawes at 1.2bar midrange tailing off to 1bar at the top, K&N induction kit, Forge VTA, Samco hoses.

Surely that spec should be worth 260bhp? I had it dyno'd at Powerstation at the weekend and got 233.5 bhp and 211 lb-ft torque. I had a bit of a missfire at the top end and was advised to re-gap my spark plugs to 0.7mm, which I did yesterday (they were at 0.8mm). The car feels a bit better, but not massively so. Would the slight misfire result in such low readings? I know PS's rollers are known for reading low compared to other rollers, but surely with my spec I should have got higher figures than the ones I got?

Here's the graph:

http://www.scoobyzone.co.uk/album_mo...werrun/ben.png


[Edited by DreXeL - 10/13/2003 7:37:31 PM]
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2003 | 07:26 PM
  #2  
drb5's Avatar
drb5
Scooby Regular
20 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,201
Likes: 0
From: Scotchland
Post

sorry if this is a bit obvious, but i had to ask. was the power figure not for "at the wheels"? couldn't see you graph by the way, page ain't workin.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2003 | 07:34 PM
  #3  
DreXeL's Avatar
DreXeL
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,460
Likes: 0
From: Yate, Bristol
Post

Nope, that's flywheel power.

Just fixed that link.

[Edited by DreXeL - 10/13/2003 7:38:02 PM]
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2003 | 10:02 PM
  #4  
DreXeL's Avatar
DreXeL
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,460
Likes: 0
From: Yate, Bristol
Post

No one has any ideas?
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2003 | 10:07 PM
  #5  
Ken Ross's Avatar
Ken Ross
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
From: Aberdeen
Post

Noticed the power you quote isn't 'normalised' at a rough guess I would say the Norm power is about 255 BHP.

You also see to have quite a high drag figure, I normally see about 80 bhp loss.

Reply
Old Oct 13, 2003 | 10:16 PM
  #6  
john banks's Avatar
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 1
From: 32 cylinders and many cats
Post

That is the farce of rolling roads though.... is the intake air temperature really >50C or is it a crutch to support the fact that the real IAT is about 20C but the cooling on the rollers is so poor that the charge temperature post intercooler reaches 30C hotter than it would on the road?

Rolling roads are supposed to be for mapping zones to best torque with minimum ignition timing, getting the right combo of fuel, timing and boost. There are too many variables to be able to sensibly put a car on one and expect the absolute value to be anywhere near accurate. Similar specs of cars (eg decat MY99 and 00 UK cars no other mods - separated by year) vary by an average of 17% between the highest and lowest reading UK rolling roads.

Pinch of salt nothing more.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2003 | 07:34 PM
  #7  
DreXeL's Avatar
DreXeL
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,460
Likes: 0
From: Yate, Bristol
Post

OK, so in your opinion John and Ken, nothing is obviously wrong with my car and my true power output is probably in the region of 255bhp?
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2003 | 07:53 PM
  #8  
john banks's Avatar
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 1
From: 32 cylinders and many cats
Post

Can't tell there is nothing wrong with the car but Powerstation does read very conservatively. What a standard car will get on some rollers will take decat/hoses and boost controller on others.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2003 | 08:14 PM
  #9  
Big Bear's Avatar
Big Bear
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 0
From: Near Bath
Post

Every car that I've taken to PS has been spot on for power , my Accord type R is rated at 212bhp , power on the rollers 209.5 . With my STI2 rated at 275 bhp on the rollers 277 . Perhaps people should not reed too much into rolling roads and enjoy the cars power as it is on the road .

Drexel were you happy with the performance before you knew the rolling road figures ? if you where then don't worry about it .
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2003 | 10:56 PM
  #10  
DreXeL's Avatar
DreXeL
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,460
Likes: 0
From: Yate, Bristol
Post

Yes I was/am happy with the performance, it's much quicker than Standard Scoobs, by a bigger margin than 233bhp would suggest. 233bhp is just a dissapointing figure, I was expecting more judging by the way it feels on the road, that's all.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2003 | 11:12 PM
  #11  
Richard Curtis's Avatar
Richard Curtis
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Post

Drexel - YHM, may cheer you up a bit
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2003 | 11:12 PM
  #12  
WREXY's Avatar
WREXY
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,833
Likes: 0
From: Greece, previously Syd Australia
Post

There have been a few scoobs on here that have gone to PE's RR and got around 260hp, then with the same mods, gone to Powerstation and got in the 230s.

As John says, Powerstations's RR gives conservative figures.

Cheers,

George.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2003 | 11:29 PM
  #13  
DreXeL's Avatar
DreXeL
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,460
Likes: 0
From: Yate, Bristol
Post

Cheers guys, that's made me feel alot better, especially the e-mail
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JimBowen
ICE
5
Jul 2, 2023 01:54 PM
KAS35RSTI
Subaru
27
Nov 4, 2021 07:12 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
Dec 28, 2015 11:07 PM
Davalar
General Technical
19
Sep 30, 2015 08:54 PM
Ozne
General Technical
2
Sep 27, 2015 03:06 PM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:38 AM.