Notices
Drivetrain Gearbox, Diffs & Driveshafts etc

Why arn't chain cambelts used any more?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12 February 2003, 07:41 PM
  #1  
Dizzy
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Dizzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 2,537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

as per question? surely they wouldn't break as much... is it purely down to cost?
Old 12 February 2003, 07:49 PM
  #2  
RON
Scooby Regular
 
RON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Deepest Darkest Dorset!!
Posts: 10,011
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

Noise is a big factor, plus the fact that chains tend to stretch!
Old 13 February 2003, 08:01 AM
  #3  
AJbaseBloke
Scooby Regular
 
AJbaseBloke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

So the EZ30 is released...

Chain drive it is then

Old 13 February 2003, 08:59 AM
  #4  
Pete Croney
Scooby Regular
 
Pete Croney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Scoobysport, Basildon, UK
Posts: 4,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

AJ

I think it has a chain for the same reason as the H6, engine bay space. The chain takes up quite a bit less room on the front of the block.

It's cheaper for the manufacturer to fit a belt and get the customer to pay for its replacement every 3 years. As John said, they are also quieter.
Old 13 February 2003, 10:15 AM
  #5  
jhd
Scooby Regular
 
jhd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

belts are also more efficient than chains - less frictional losses blah blah blah.
im for chains - at least they rattle before leaving go

jhd
Old 13 February 2003, 11:02 AM
  #6  
BugEyed
Scooby Regular
 
BugEyed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

John, Pete, and jhd have it correct.

A belt is superior in terms of noise, and not needing lubrication. However, they occupy more space and have greater inertia and require more space due to the width of them. In particular they also suffer from overheating unless supplied with plenty of airflow and can suffer from jumping if stones get into them.

Chains suffer from the need to be lubricated and create noise, even when correctly tensioned. This is particularly the case where one chain is used to drive twin overhead cams per bank as the torsional vibrations between the cams can result in the chain being constantly switched been drive and overun between the cams. This not a problem in the single cam per bank engines such as the H6.

Duncan

Pete - how could you be so cynical to suggest that Subaru would pass the cost onto the customer - it would be so unlike them.
Old 13 February 2003, 05:50 PM
  #7  
MorayMackenzie
Scooby Senior
 
MorayMackenzie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 3,410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

BMW use duplex camchains in a number of their 4 cylinder engines... its odd looking through a service schedule book and not finding a cambelt interval! Apparently, the BMW chains are designed to last the life of the engine. Having seen one in an open S14 I dont doub't this. A BMW main dealer told me that its the tensioner that you need to watch... if you start hearing more noise from the camchain as the tensioner starts to fail, that's the time to change the tensioner. Apparently, the E34 models tensioner is a bit more rugged, and can be retro fitted to the E30 cars if and when a tensioner change is necessary.

Mind you, the chain in the H6 looks a little less substantial than the BMW duplex one.
Old 13 February 2003, 05:56 PM
  #8  
Leigh
Scooby Regular
 
Leigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

Who says chains are more reliable? My wife's Astra coupe 2.2 snapped its cam chain at 21k miles/14 months!!
Thank **** for warranties... The explanation from the dealer was that it was "Just one of those things!"

Vauxhall = Quality
Old 13 February 2003, 06:22 PM
  #9  
milkytadpole
Scooby Regular
 
milkytadpole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Most cars will revert back to camchains in the near future as ultra-long service intervals become standard. J
Old 13 February 2003, 06:34 PM
  #10  
MorayMackenzie
Scooby Senior
 
MorayMackenzie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 3,410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

I guess that means we will be losing the turbochargers too, to extend oil service intervals as well ?
Old 14 February 2003, 01:59 PM
  #11  
MorayMackenzie
Scooby Senior
 
MorayMackenzie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 3,410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

personally, I think they should make camchains and pulleys out of tungsten carbide... and rear cambelts should be welded on or cast into the block... but thats just me. ho hum.
Old 02 December 2003, 08:40 PM
  #12  
JohnD
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
JohnD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Havering, Essex
Posts: 6,252
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Talking

Cheaper, quieter, do not need lubricating. As for chain stretch - It would be taken up by the tensioner but could result in a small change in valve timing. Belts stretch a little but not much.
JohnD

[Edited by JohnD - 2/12/2003 8:45:06 PM]
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KAS35RSTI
Subaru
27
04 November 2021 07:12 PM
MH-Racing
Subaru Parts
18
18 October 2015 04:49 PM
dovey963
ScoobyNet General
0
28 September 2015 08:20 PM
shorty87
Other Marques
0
25 September 2015 08:52 PM



Quick Reply: Why arn't chain cambelts used any more?



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:37 PM.