Half a Racing Suction Kit for a Fifth of the Price
24 August 2002, 04:12 PM
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 1,835
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OK - if you do not ues a MAF sensor here is an alternative to the Racing Suction kit.
It is a Pipercross induction kit that replaces both the inlet and the MAF - OK not quite a groovy as a the Racing Suction kit - but much, much cheaper - I think it is off a Range Rover - AND much better filtration. On the rollers this has performed significantly better than the similar ITG foam cone.
Trout
It is a Pipercross induction kit that replaces both the inlet and the MAF - OK not quite a groovy as a the Racing Suction kit - but much, much cheaper - I think it is off a Range Rover - AND much better filtration. On the rollers this has performed significantly better than the similar ITG foam cone.
Trout
24 August 2002, 05:40 PM
#2
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Trout do you have a cold feed in the wing pointing towards this?
Did you have to bend the brake pipes on the abs unit tro get the piping in, if so how did you do it?(sensible answer please)
Its the bell housing on that filter thats longer than normal i think. looks good
steven
Did you have to bend the brake pipes on the abs unit tro get the piping in, if so how did you do it?(sensible answer please
)Its the bell housing on that filter thats longer than normal i think. looks good
steven
24 August 2002, 06:03 PM
#3
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 1,835
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No cold air feed - I did have one - but the FMIC piping is in the way - am looking at new options - possible new scoop on bonnet
Nothing has had to be moved to do this - brake pipes do not interfere as the long bell housing pipe effectively replaces the MAF.
I think the filter cost around £60 - not bad - and on a turbo will be rated up to 500bhp - and I am not there - yet!
Trout
Nothing has had to be moved to do this - brake pipes do not interfere as the long bell housing pipe effectively replaces the MAF.
I think the filter cost around £60 - not bad - and on a turbo will be rated up to 500bhp - and I am not there - yet!
Trout
Trending Topics
27 August 2002, 09:33 AM
#8
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 1,835
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Errrrrr - no - nothing deliberate - just that the source did not provide box, partno or anything - and no - it's not robbed 
Will investigate and let you know.
Trout
Will investigate and let you know.
Trout
27 August 2002, 12:04 PM
#10
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 1,835
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
DR,
I don't need a MAF as I use a LINK - many of the aftermarket ECUs can be run on MAP sensor instead of MAF.
There are pluses and minuses - however on the Phase II engine it is definately a plus as the MAF is the most fragile component on the car!
Trout
I don't need a MAF as I use a LINK - many of the aftermarket ECUs can be run on MAP sensor instead of MAF.
There are pluses and minuses - however on the Phase II engine it is definately a plus as the MAF is the most fragile component on the car!
Trout
27 August 2002, 12:16 PM
#11
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Trout
Thanks for offering to investigate
From the picture you have posted the filter seems to be from the Pipercross PX700 Range
http://www.pipercross.com/PX700.htm
Would be ideal if your source knows the Pipercross Stock Code for a MY98 UK
[Edited by madou - 8/27/2002 12:27:22 PM]
Thanks for offering to investigate
From the picture you have posted the filter seems to be from the Pipercross PX700 Range
http://www.pipercross.com/PX700.htm
Would be ideal if your source knows the Pipercross Stock Code for a MY98 UK
[Edited by madou - 8/27/2002 12:27:22 PM]
27 August 2002, 01:04 PM
#12
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 1,835
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Madou,
this filter is NOT a Scooby part - I think it is for a Range Rover - rated to 340bhp normally aspirated so around 500bhp turbo....mmmmmmm - turbo (Homer Simpson mode!)
Will see if I can find out.
Trout
this filter is NOT a Scooby part - I think it is for a Range Rover - rated to 340bhp normally aspirated so around 500bhp turbo....mmmmmmm - turbo (Homer Simpson mode!)
Will see if I can find out.
Trout
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
