Notices
Computer & Technology Related Post here for help and discussion of computing and related technology. Internet, TVs, phones, consoles, computers, tablets and any other gadgets.

BEST VOIP PROVIDERS? WHO DO YOU RECCOMEND?

Old May 16, 2008 | 08:02 AM
  #1  
Supercue's Avatar
Supercue
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,806
Likes: 0
From: Essex, England
Cool BEST VOIP PROVIDERS? WHO DO YOU RECCOMEND?

After being severely shafted for the last 5mths by Virgin (no lube either ) on my phone bill at home, I've decided to opt for VOIP.

My biggest requirement besides the obvious things like call quality, cost etc. is to be able to divert calls to my mobile when out on call at the lowest price.

Your thoughts would be appreciated
Reply
Old May 16, 2008 | 09:10 AM
  #2  
RichB's Avatar
RichB
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 3,666
Likes: 0
From: Bore Knee Muff
Default

We use Home - Gradwell Dot Com ...
Reply
Old May 17, 2008 | 07:45 AM
  #3  
Dark's Avatar
Dark
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 739
Likes: 0
From: West Lothian, Scotland
Default

I've used draytel.org for the last 6 months without any problems.
Reply
Old May 18, 2008 | 07:04 AM
  #4  
Supercue's Avatar
Supercue
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,806
Likes: 0
From: Essex, England
Default

Decided to give Draytel a trial and see how I get on.
Thanks for your help
Reply
Old May 19, 2008 | 12:31 PM
  #5  
TonyBurns's Avatar
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 2
From: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Wink

Originally Posted by Supercue
After being severely shafted for the last 5mths by Virgin (no lube either ) on my phone bill at home, I've decided to opt for VOIP.

My biggest requirement besides the obvious things like call quality, cost etc. is to be able to divert calls to my mobile when out on call at the lowest price.

Your thoughts would be appreciated
Cost is usually less for voip, so is the quality, though its also down to the provider, data systems were never meant to run voice applications and hence wont be as good, but it doesnt mean its not for you.
As for the mobile, be in for a shock, voip on a mobile is a no-no really, most of the big mobile companies have barred the use of voip applications on their network because they use up far too much bandwidth, take note that the bandwidth will hit your bill if you do use a mobile voip application.

Tony
Reply
Old May 19, 2008 | 03:19 PM
  #6  
RichB's Avatar
RichB
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 3,666
Likes: 0
From: Bore Knee Muff
Default

You might want to look into getting a QoS (quality of service) router.

Something that gives priority to VOIP traffic over all over traffic, our call quality is currently poor because of this.
Reply
Old May 19, 2008 | 08:31 PM
  #7  
Supercue's Avatar
Supercue
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,806
Likes: 0
From: Essex, England
Default

Originally Posted by TonyBurns
Cost is usually less for voip, so is the quality, though its also down to the provider, data systems were never meant to run voice applications and hence wont be as good, but it doesnt mean its not for you.
As for the mobile, be in for a shock, voip on a mobile is a no-no really, most of the big mobile companies have barred the use of voip applications on their network because they use up far too much bandwidth, take note that the bandwidth will hit your bill if you do use a mobile voip application.

Tony
Thanks Tony, I'm really looking to use the call forwarding features rather than anything else. This feature alone will slay my current charges by over 50%


Originally Posted by RichB
You might want to look into getting a QoS (quality of service) router.

Something that gives priority to VOIP traffic over all over traffic, our call quality is currently poor because of this.

I'm going to be using a Draytek 2800g Vigor coupled with a Cisco 7960.
I'll also be giving the VOIP dedicated bandwidth so hopefully all should be OK

I'll let you know how I get on once everything is set up. I'm just waiting for the router to be delivered so by the weekend I should be live.
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2008 | 11:38 PM
  #8  
Dazza's-STi's Avatar
Dazza's-STi
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,970
Likes: 0
From: Some say he has frost on his helmet...
Default

Originally Posted by RichB
You might want to look into getting a QoS (quality of service) router.

Something that gives priority to VOIP traffic over all over traffic, our call quality is currently poor because of this.

just for info, qos will only have any effect when your uploading from you home network, if thats where your using it... will have no effect at all on incoming traffic. common miss-conception even with engineers who i talk to who should know better

daz
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2008 | 11:48 PM
  #9  
Dazza's-STi's Avatar
Dazza's-STi
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,970
Likes: 0
From: Some say he has frost on his helmet...
Default

Originally Posted by TonyBurns
Cost is usually less for voip, so is the quality, though its also down to the provider, data systems were never meant to run voice applications and hence wont be as good, but it doesnt mean its not for you.
As for the mobile, be in for a shock, voip on a mobile is a no-no really, most of the big mobile companies have barred the use of voip applications on their network because they use up far too much bandwidth, take note that the bandwidth will hit your bill if you do use a mobile voip application.

Tony
No offence Tony, but you need to read up a bit before making wide statments like those... data networks handle voip perfectly if set to do so, and voip uses around 22kbps... not sure of how many mobile operators prevent voip traffic, wouldn't have thought any would now though...

daz
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2008 | 09:45 AM
  #10  
RichB's Avatar
RichB
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 3,666
Likes: 0
From: Bore Knee Muff
Default

At work we are in a shared office, they have given us an IP address but using a packeteer are throttling us to about 2mb down and 1mb up.
Our VOIP is poor when anyone in the office goes on the internet.
Any suggestions Dazza, we have a router but it doesn't have a lot of features on it.
Would setting up NAT to send all VOIP traffic to the base stations IP address help? It obviously sorts itself out anyway but it can get quite crackly.

I suspect it's mostly due to the number of machines (12 ish) hanging off this one small connection that's to blame really.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2008 | 10:23 AM
  #11  
RoadrunnerV2's Avatar
RoadrunnerV2
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Dazza's-STi
No offence Tony, but you need to read up a bit before making wide statments like those... data networks handle voip perfectly if set to do so, and voip uses around 22kbps... not sure of how many mobile operators prevent voip traffic, wouldn't have thought any would now though...

daz
Ditto VoIP can be toll quality as per the MOS test results and will work if deployed right. My company has successfully been operating on pure VoIP for the last 18 months.

With regards to mobile operators, it's not down to bandwidth. It's because their infrastructure isn't designed to handle real-time traffic. Plus why invest heavily into deploying VoIP when they already have a lucrative cash cow
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2008 | 10:36 AM
  #12  
RoadrunnerV2's Avatar
RoadrunnerV2
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by RichB
At work we are in a shared office, they have given us an IP address but using a packeteer are throttling us to about 2mb down and 1mb up.
Our VOIP is poor when anyone in the office goes on the internet.
Any suggestions Dazza, we have a router but it doesn't have a lot of features on it.
Would setting up NAT to send all VOIP traffic to the base stations IP address help? It obviously sorts itself out anyway but it can get quite crackly.

I suspect it's mostly due to the number of machines (12 ish) hanging off this one small connection that's to blame really.
Your main issue is down to bandwidth consumption.

Some steps to take.

I would suggest looking at prioritising your VoIP over your Data. Easiest way is to replace your router with a router that supports QoS. Something like the DrayTek Vigor 2910 would do the trick.

You need to identity what VoIP codec you are using?

Identify the number of concurrent calls at peak times?

Look at how your LAN is setup.

Getting the answers for the above isn’t as difficult as it first looks
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2008 | 11:55 PM
  #13  
Dazza's-STi's Avatar
Dazza's-STi
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,970
Likes: 0
From: Some say he has frost on his helmet...
Default

Originally Posted by RoadrunnerV2
Ditto VoIP can be toll quality as per the MOS test results and will work if deployed right. My company has successfully been operating on pure VoIP for the last 18 months.

With regards to mobile operators, it's not down to bandwidth. It's because their infrastructure isn't designed to handle real-time traffic. Plus why invest heavily into deploying VoIP when they already have a lucrative cash cow
I'd need a list of kit, please let it be Cisco at least i'd have a chance, and a network diagram...
from what you've said, the packeteer should be able to shape the traffic and provide QOS, if not you could put a swicth in before the packeteer and police the traffic before it get to the packeteer i.e.pre-empt the dropped packets the packeteer is creating with its throttling... I normally do this on frame relay networks before the provider polices and drops packets in the network... there are ways to get excelent quality... just need some thought.. after all 16,000 BBC staff can't be wrong
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2008 | 01:07 PM
  #14  
RoadrunnerV2's Avatar
RoadrunnerV2
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Dazza's-STi
I'd need a list of kit, please let it be Cisco at least i'd have a chance, and a network diagram...
from what you've said, the packeteer should be able to shape the traffic and provide QOS, if not you could put a swicth in before the packeteer and police the traffic before it get to the packeteer i.e.pre-empt the dropped packets the packeteer is creating with its throttling... I normally do this on frame relay networks before the provider polices and drops packets in the network... there are ways to get excelent quality... just need some thought.. after all 16,000 BBC staff can't be wrong
Yep it's on Cisco My company specialises in CCME and I'm guessing you need CCM with the number of staff. I'm happy to give a few pointers for designing a VoIP infrastructure.

Last edited by RoadrunnerV2; Aug 4, 2008 at 01:18 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2008 | 06:11 AM
  #15  
Beastie's Avatar
Beastie
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,397
Likes: 17
From: Scotland
Default

Guys
Have you looked at justvoip.com where you can use the voip service by connecting your landline phone with the destination phone. i.e. you only use the computer to request the call. Your landline phone rings, you answer, then the destination phone rings and they answer. Cheap as chips and call quality is perfect. You can also do computer calls to destination phones as well if thats your bag. We have been using for months now and very satisfied.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KAS35RSTI
Subaru
27
Nov 4, 2021 07:12 PM
Frizzle-Dee
Essex Subaru Owners Club
13
Dec 1, 2015 09:37 AM
IanG1983
Wheels, Tyres & Brakes
2
Oct 6, 2015 03:08 PM
SmurfyBhoy
General Technical
5
Sep 24, 2015 10:27 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:31 AM.