ScoobyNet.com - Subaru Enthusiast Forum

ScoobyNet.com - Subaru Enthusiast Forum (https://www.scoobynet.com/)
-   Computer & Technology Related (https://www.scoobynet.com/computer-and-technology-related-34/)
-   -   BEST VOIP PROVIDERS? WHO DO YOU RECCOMEND? (https://www.scoobynet.com/computer-and-technology-related-34/687960-best-voip-providers-who-do-you-reccomend.html)

Supercue 16 May 2008 08:02 AM

BEST VOIP PROVIDERS? WHO DO YOU RECCOMEND?
 
After being severely shafted for the last 5mths by Virgin (no lube either:Whatever_ ) on my phone bill at home, I've decided to opt for VOIP.

My biggest requirement besides the obvious things like call quality, cost etc. is to be able to divert calls to my mobile when out on call at the lowest price.

Your thoughts would be appreciated;):thumb:

RichB 16 May 2008 09:10 AM

We use Home - Gradwell Dot Com ...

Dark 17 May 2008 07:45 AM

I've used draytel.org for the last 6 months without any problems.

Supercue 18 May 2008 07:04 AM

Decided to give Draytel a trial and see how I get on.
Thanks for your help:thumb:

TonyBurns 19 May 2008 12:31 PM


Originally Posted by Supercue (Post 7876535)
After being severely shafted for the last 5mths by Virgin (no lube either:Whatever_ ) on my phone bill at home, I've decided to opt for VOIP.

My biggest requirement besides the obvious things like call quality, cost etc. is to be able to divert calls to my mobile when out on call at the lowest price.

Your thoughts would be appreciated;):thumb:

Cost is usually less for voip, so is the quality, though its also down to the provider, data systems were never meant to run voice applications and hence wont be as good, but it doesnt mean its not for you.
As for the mobile, be in for a shock, voip on a mobile is a no-no really, most of the big mobile companies have barred the use of voip applications on their network because they use up far too much bandwidth, take note that the bandwidth will hit your bill if you do use a mobile voip application.

Tony:)

RichB 19 May 2008 03:19 PM

You might want to look into getting a QoS (quality of service) router.

Something that gives priority to VOIP traffic over all over traffic, our call quality is currently poor because of this.

Supercue 19 May 2008 08:31 PM


Originally Posted by TonyBurns (Post 7882511)
Cost is usually less for voip, so is the quality, though its also down to the provider, data systems were never meant to run voice applications and hence wont be as good, but it doesnt mean its not for you.
As for the mobile, be in for a shock, voip on a mobile is a no-no really, most of the big mobile companies have barred the use of voip applications on their network because they use up far too much bandwidth, take note that the bandwidth will hit your bill if you do use a mobile voip application.

Tony:)

Thanks Tony, I'm really looking to use the call forwarding features rather than anything else. This feature alone will slay my current charges by over 50%:thumb:



Originally Posted by RichB (Post 7882845)
You might want to look into getting a QoS (quality of service) router.

Something that gives priority to VOIP traffic over all over traffic, our call quality is currently poor because of this.


I'm going to be using a Draytek 2800g Vigor coupled with a Cisco 7960.
I'll also be giving the VOIP dedicated bandwidth so hopefully all should be OK:p

I'll let you know how I get on once everything is set up. I'm just waiting for the router to be delivered so by the weekend I should be live.:thumb::D

Dazza's-STi 31 July 2008 11:38 PM


Originally Posted by RichB (Post 7882845)
You might want to look into getting a QoS (quality of service) router.

Something that gives priority to VOIP traffic over all over traffic, our call quality is currently poor because of this.


just for info, qos will only have any effect when your uploading from you home network, if thats where your using it... will have no effect at all on incoming traffic. common miss-conception even with engineers who i talk to who should know better;)

daz

Dazza's-STi 31 July 2008 11:48 PM


Originally Posted by TonyBurns (Post 7882511)
Cost is usually less for voip, so is the quality, though its also down to the provider, data systems were never meant to run voice applications and hence wont be as good, but it doesnt mean its not for you.
As for the mobile, be in for a shock, voip on a mobile is a no-no really, most of the big mobile companies have barred the use of voip applications on their network because they use up far too much bandwidth, take note that the bandwidth will hit your bill if you do use a mobile voip application.

Tony:)

No offence Tony, but you need to read up a bit before making wide statments like those... :thumb: data networks handle voip perfectly if set to do so, and voip uses around 22kbps... not sure of how many mobile operators prevent voip traffic, wouldn't have thought any would now though...

daz

RichB 01 August 2008 09:45 AM

At work we are in a shared office, they have given us an IP address but using a packeteer are throttling us to about 2mb down and 1mb up.
Our VOIP is poor when anyone in the office goes on the internet.
Any suggestions Dazza, we have a router but it doesn't have a lot of features on it.
Would setting up NAT to send all VOIP traffic to the base stations IP address help? It obviously sorts itself out anyway but it can get quite crackly.

I suspect it's mostly due to the number of machines (12 ish) hanging off this one small connection that's to blame really.

RoadrunnerV2 01 August 2008 10:23 AM


Originally Posted by Dazza's-STi (Post 8041848)
No offence Tony, but you need to read up a bit before making wide statments like those... :thumb: data networks handle voip perfectly if set to do so, and voip uses around 22kbps... not sure of how many mobile operators prevent voip traffic, wouldn't have thought any would now though...

daz

Ditto :) VoIP can be toll quality as per the MOS test results and will work if deployed right. My company has successfully been operating on pure VoIP for the last 18 months.

With regards to mobile operators, it's not down to bandwidth. It's because their infrastructure isn't designed to handle real-time traffic. Plus why invest heavily into deploying VoIP when they already have a lucrative cash cow ;)

RoadrunnerV2 01 August 2008 10:36 AM


Originally Posted by RichB (Post 8042140)
At work we are in a shared office, they have given us an IP address but using a packeteer are throttling us to about 2mb down and 1mb up.
Our VOIP is poor when anyone in the office goes on the internet.
Any suggestions Dazza, we have a router but it doesn't have a lot of features on it.
Would setting up NAT to send all VOIP traffic to the base stations IP address help? It obviously sorts itself out anyway but it can get quite crackly.

I suspect it's mostly due to the number of machines (12 ish) hanging off this one small connection that's to blame really.

Your main issue is down to bandwidth consumption.

Some steps to take.

I would suggest looking at prioritising your VoIP over your Data. Easiest way is to replace your router with a router that supports QoS. Something like the DrayTek Vigor 2910 would do the trick.

You need to identity what VoIP codec you are using?

Identify the number of concurrent calls at peak times?

Look at how your LAN is setup.

Getting the answers for the above isn’t as difficult as it first looks :)

Dazza's-STi 01 August 2008 11:55 PM


Originally Posted by RoadrunnerV2 (Post 8042190)
Ditto :) VoIP can be toll quality as per the MOS test results and will work if deployed right. My company has successfully been operating on pure VoIP for the last 18 months.

With regards to mobile operators, it's not down to bandwidth. It's because their infrastructure isn't designed to handle real-time traffic. Plus why invest heavily into deploying VoIP when they already have a lucrative cash cow ;)

I'd need a list of kit, please let it be Cisco:lol1: at least i'd have a chance, and a network diagram...
from what you've said, the packeteer should be able to shape the traffic and provide QOS, if not you could put a swicth in before the packeteer and police the traffic before it get to the packeteer i.e.pre-empt the dropped packets the packeteer is creating with its throttling... I normally do this on frame relay networks before the provider polices and drops packets in the network... there are ways to get excelent quality... just need some thought.. after all 16,000 BBC staff can't be wrong:thumb:

RoadrunnerV2 04 August 2008 01:07 PM


Originally Posted by Dazza's-STi (Post 8044068)
I'd need a list of kit, please let it be Cisco:lol1: at least i'd have a chance, and a network diagram...
from what you've said, the packeteer should be able to shape the traffic and provide QOS, if not you could put a swicth in before the packeteer and police the traffic before it get to the packeteer i.e.pre-empt the dropped packets the packeteer is creating with its throttling... I normally do this on frame relay networks before the provider polices and drops packets in the network... there are ways to get excelent quality... just need some thought.. after all 16,000 BBC staff can't be wrong:thumb:

Yep it's on Cisco :D My company specialises in CCME and I'm guessing you need CCM with the number of staff. I'm happy to give a few pointers for designing a VoIP infrastructure.

Beastie 05 August 2008 06:11 AM

Guys
Have you looked at justvoip.com where you can use the voip service by connecting your landline phone with the destination phone. i.e. you only use the computer to request the call. Your landline phone rings, you answer, then the destination phone rings and they answer. Cheap as chips and call quality is perfect. You can also do computer calls to destination phones as well if thats your bag. We have been using for months now and very satisfied.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:19 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands