Show us your tape backup throughput rates
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Show us your tape backup throughput rates
Preferably on a X86 windows platform.
State: direct attach, San Attached, Over Network - onto tape
and software used
David
State: direct attach, San Attached, Over Network - onto tape
and software used
David
#5
Scooby Regular
LTO Autoloader, 1gb per min, local attached, and across dual gigabit network
DL380 G4's, Windows 2003 SP1, Backup Exec 9.1
not the best, but that was well over 18months ago I put that in
DL380 G4's, Windows 2003 SP1, Backup Exec 9.1
not the best, but that was well over 18months ago I put that in
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Lovely Lancing in West Sussex
Posts: 3,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LTO2, 1.2GB per min SCSI locally attached Windows 2003 SP1 with Backup Exec 9.1. Drops down to half that when backing up the remote agents over the LAN.
Darren
Darren
#9
Scooby Regular
On a Dell PowerEdge 6650 with fibre connected storage, but with SCSI connected SDLT autoloader about 2Gb/min. Would the type of data have an impact on the speed of backup, ie the back of a single large database be comparitively quicker than the same amount of data in seperate, little, files?
#11
Scooby Regular
Dell PowerEdge 2850
Server 2003
Backup Exec 10
DLT1 Drive (directly) attached
Local backup - average is 190Mb/min (slow or what)
Dell PowerEdge 2650
Server 2003 + BackupExec 10
DLT1 (directly attached)
Network backup via Agent - average is 170Mb/min (over 1Gb copper)
System is 3yrs old.
Server 2003
Backup Exec 10
DLT1 Drive (directly) attached
Local backup - average is 190Mb/min (slow or what)
Dell PowerEdge 2650
Server 2003 + BackupExec 10
DLT1 (directly attached)
Network backup via Agent - average is 170Mb/min (over 1Gb copper)
System is 3yrs old.
#12
Never thought about comparing throughputs!
Good choice in topic David
No point in even mentioning our rates, 10x DLT7000 in a STK L700. Slow is not the word...
This thread should give me some numbers to compare against when the new LTO's turn up.
Good choice in topic David
No point in even mentioning our rates, 10x DLT7000 in a STK L700. Slow is not the word...
This thread should give me some numbers to compare against when the new LTO's turn up.
#13
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 8,384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by David_Wallis
Preferably on a X86 windows platform.
State: direct attach, San Attached, Over Network - onto tape
and software used
David
State: direct attach, San Attached, Over Network - onto tape
and software used
David
#14
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Yep..
Also going to ditch Galaxy CommVault and probably go Netbackup..
Our problem is we are govererned by some tight financial regs, so need to keep the data for a minimum of 6 Years, this means there is around 10tb of data weekly going into secure storage..
We use Multiple SDLT and LTO2 Loaders, but we are only seeing @30gb per hour, but we do encrypt all data too..
David
Also going to ditch Galaxy CommVault and probably go Netbackup..
Our problem is we are govererned by some tight financial regs, so need to keep the data for a minimum of 6 Years, this means there is around 10tb of data weekly going into secure storage..
We use Multiple SDLT and LTO2 Loaders, but we are only seeing @30gb per hour, but we do encrypt all data too..
David
#16
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
well thats good because we have an EVA5000 and a MSL6000 with 4x LTO2's
Is it actually network attached or SAN attached??
David
Is it actually network attached or SAN attached??
David
#17
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 8,384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by David_Wallis
Yep..
Also going to ditch Galaxy CommVault and probably go Netbackup..
Our problem is we are govererned by some tight financial regs, so need to keep the data for a minimum of 6 Years, this means there is around 10tb of data weekly going into secure storage..
We use Multiple SDLT and LTO2 Loaders, but we are only seeing @30gb per hour, but we do encrypt all data too..
David
Also going to ditch Galaxy CommVault and probably go Netbackup..
Our problem is we are govererned by some tight financial regs, so need to keep the data for a minimum of 6 Years, this means there is around 10tb of data weekly going into secure storage..
We use Multiple SDLT and LTO2 Loaders, but we are only seeing @30gb per hour, but we do encrypt all data too..
David
Netbackup seems better than Networker (Legato product) - but all back-up s/w is evil.....
#18
Originally Posted by DrEvil
We use Netbackup, but first off the data goes to disk, then off to tape after a period of time (sorry I forget the exact details, as I don't manage that side of things here). We too have tight rules to follow regarding data retention for 6 yrs.
Netbackup seems better than Networker (Legato product) - but all back-up s/w is evil.....
Netbackup seems better than Networker (Legato product) - but all back-up s/w is evil.....
David, is throughput your biggest issue?
We use Netbackup to dump its backup images to a DataDomain device, it seems to average about 45MB/s for multiple jobs/streams. You can then duplicate the images onto tape and vault them with in our case slowww DLT's...
H
#19
Originally Posted by David_Wallis
well thats good because we have an EVA5000 and a MSL6000 with 4x LTO2's
Is it actually network attached or SAN attached??
David
Is it actually network attached or SAN attached??
David
#20
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
if you dump to disk first, do you then have to restore a backup file from the tape to disk and then restore the required file from that backup file, or does it deal with staging the backup files, and make restores easier??
David
David
#21
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 8,384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by David_Wallis
if you dump to disk first, do you then have to restore a backup file from the tape to disk and then restore the required file from that backup file, or does it deal with staging the backup files, and make restores easier??
David
David
Big plus is when people request a recently backed up file - no faffin' around trying to get a tape loaded back into the jukebox.
#22
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Most of our restores are normally from months ago, shadow copy on the data servers has helped though
Shame it costs £50 to retrieve a tape
David
Shame it costs £50 to retrieve a tape
David
#24
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: There on the stair
Posts: 10,208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just checking last nights backups...
Backup Set Information
Family Name: "Media created 08/06/2006 18:00:04"
Backup of "\\******\****"
Backup set #11 on storage media #1
Backup set description: "Daily\weekly\monthly set 2"
Backup Type: Full - Back Up Files - Reset Archive Bit
Backup started on 08/06/2006 at 21:13:23.
Backup completed on 08/06/2006 at 21:19:23.
Backup Set Summary
Backed up 11 files in 6 directories.
Processed 19,694,898,278 bytes in 6 minutes and 0 seconds.
Throughput rate: 3130 MB/min
Backup Set Information
Family Name: "Media created 08/06/2006 18:00:04"
Backup of "\\******\****"
Backup set #11 on storage media #1
Backup set description: "Daily\weekly\monthly set 2"
Backup Type: Full - Back Up Files - Reset Archive Bit
Backup started on 08/06/2006 at 21:13:23.
Backup completed on 08/06/2006 at 21:19:23.
Backup Set Summary
Backed up 11 files in 6 directories.
Processed 19,694,898,278 bytes in 6 minutes and 0 seconds.
Throughput rate: 3130 MB/min
#26
Guest
Posts: n/a
Finally moved to our Server team so thought i'd come back to this thread.
Backup Exec 10d on DL380 G4's using MSL500's to SAN attached storage is giving 300-400mb per minute depending on which of our backup servers I look at. A 150gb job is taking about 6 hours.
Backup Exec 10d on DL380 G4's using MSL500's to SAN attached storage is giving 300-400mb per minute depending on which of our backup servers I look at. A 150gb job is taking about 6 hours.
Last edited by Bravo2zero_sps; 11 August 2006 at 12:28 PM.
#28
Guest
Posts: n/a
Cheers Darren, i'm over the moon about it, off on a Proliant course in 2 weeks and have been learning loads already as we have over 200 servers on site plus our DR site and external hosting so lots to learn on what does what Got some books on order to start studying as its time I got some MCP's.
Hows things with you? Had anymore thoughts on moving on somewhere else?
Hows things with you? Had anymore thoughts on moving on somewhere else?
#29
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: A Shanty Town near you !
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
80 - 90MB per second to LTO2
This is from a clarion SAN going directly to tape. With TIvoli Storage Manager
They are large SQL databases
This is from a clarion SAN going directly to tape. With TIvoli Storage Manager
They are large SQL databases
Last edited by Monkeh; 08 August 2006 at 12:31 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sam Witwicky
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
17
13 November 2015 10:49 AM
gazzawrx
Non Car Related Items For sale
13
17 October 2015 06:51 PM