Notices
Computer & Technology Related Post here for help and discussion of computing and related technology. Internet, TVs, phones, consoles, computers, tablets and any other gadgets.

please confirm - 2no. 256MB DDR chips in dual channel modem faster than 1no. 512MB?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11 June 2005, 04:56 PM
  #1  
Fuchsrohre
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Fuchsrohre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default please confirm - 2no. 256MB DDR chips in dual channel modem faster than 1no. 512MB?

Can I assume that 2no. 256MB DDR chips working in DUAL CHANNEL mode will be faster than a single 512MB DDR chip on its own ?

I've asked a similar question in the past but would just like confirmation that "dual channel" implements a 128 bit memory interface...

...compared with a single DDR which would operate with an 64bit wide memory interface ?
Old 11 June 2005, 05:01 PM
  #2  
_Meridian_
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
_Meridian_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Mancs
Posts: 2,806
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

They are faster in benchmarks. I doubt you'll spot any difference in the Real World.


M
Old 11 June 2005, 05:36 PM
  #3  
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
TonyBurns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Yes it will be quicker, just think of it as filling up a watering can, 2 small ones to 1 big one, 3 hose pipes filling up at the same rate, the 2 small ones will be full in half the time the big one will, basically thats how it works.

Tony
Old 11 June 2005, 05:59 PM
  #4  
Fuchsrohre
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Fuchsrohre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Don't confuse me with your watering can analogy Tony- I'm confused enough as it is DOH!

Meridian, surely in a single cycle, a 128 bit access is a lot more beneficial than its 64 bit equivalent ?

Last edited by Fuchsrohre; 11 June 2005 at 06:21 PM.
Old 11 June 2005, 06:32 PM
  #5  
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
TonyBurns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Basically 2 256mb ddr/ddr2 will "fill up" twice as quick as 1 512 ddr/ddr2.
I think thats what you wanted to know
Though the down side is, that you will eventually have to change to something bigger if you want more memory.

Tony
Old 11 June 2005, 06:39 PM
  #6  
Fuchsrohre
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Fuchsrohre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Tony, I've got 2no. 512MB which I'm looking to add another 2 or perhaps an additional 2no 1024MB
Old 11 June 2005, 07:00 PM
  #7  
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
TonyBurns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Ok back to the beginning
I take it the mother board is a duel channel mobo?
You can mix and match a bit on these, if you have 4 slots like mine does, you can have 2 pairs or 2 of 256mb ram running in duel channel mode, you can run single channel mode if you put them next to each other in different coloured banks (same colour bank = duel channel) or you can run say a 256mb and a 512mb in duel channel BUT you have to reflect this on the other duel channel otherwise it wont work.
Thats it, ive confused myself

Tony

Trending Topics

Old 11 June 2005, 07:13 PM
  #8  
davedipster
Scooby Senior
 
davedipster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Essex
Posts: 2,600
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fuchsrohre
Can I assume that 2no. 256MB DDR chips working in DUAL CHANNEL mode will be faster than a single 512MB DDR chip on its own ?

I've asked a similar question in the past but would just like confirmation that "dual channel" implements a 128 bit memory interface...

...compared with a single DDR which would operate with an 64bit wide memory interface ?
Faster if your mobo supports Dual channel. Mine does - A7N8X deluxe.
Always use matched pairs as well.
Old 11 June 2005, 08:24 PM
  #9  
jpor
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
jpor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fuchsrohre
Can I assume that 2no. 256MB DDR chips working in DUAL CHANNEL mode will be faster than a single 512MB DDR chip on its own ?

I've asked a similar question in the past but would just like confirmation that "dual channel" implements a 128 bit memory interface...

...compared with a single DDR which would operate with an 64bit wide memory interface ?
Put it this way. Yes dual channel is faster as programs are being run faster. But you will find that 2 x 512MB(1024MB or 1GB) in Dual Mode even better as Windows XP has more physical RAM to run programs and thus will not need to swap file to the hard disk any surpless programs that won't fit into RAM.
Old 12 June 2005, 12:01 AM
  #10  
_Meridian_
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
_Meridian_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Mancs
Posts: 2,806
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Fuchsrohre

Meridian, surely in a single cycle, a 128 bit access is a lot more beneficial than its 64 bit equivalent ?
Yes, but in computing nothing is that simple. For instance, in theory DDR RAM is twice as quick as SDR, in practice the difference is about 15%. In the case of SC to DC, the improvement with Dual-Channel is about 7% at best.


M
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
28 December 2015 11:07 PM
timmy2take
Non Scooby Related
2
02 October 2015 08:09 AM
madmover
Member's Gallery
4
28 September 2015 10:46 AM
Nick_Cat
Computer & Technology Related
2
26 September 2015 08:00 AM
S600HBY
Subaru Parts
0
25 September 2015 09:46 AM



Quick Reply: please confirm - 2no. 256MB DDR chips in dual channel modem faster than 1no. 512MB?



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:12 AM.