Aztec Performance Ltd

iTrader: (234)

Has anyone else experienced slower and 'odd' download speeds. Ever since the new build 0.673?

Bob

ozzy

Nope; although I use RevConnect. Their new build (to coincide with the newer DC) kept crashing. Seems to have settled down recently though.

bigsinky

like ozzy i use revconnect and have had no slow downs since the newer "c" build

Luminous

iTrader: (3)

Wow, I like the sound of Revconnect. Going to try that now. Is there a good forum that you people use to keep up to date with what is happening in the P2P world?

bigsinky

@luminous

you need to be aware alot of hubs don't allow revconnect and yo may be kicked and banned for using it, but yes alot better than DC++ in that multiple connections can be made.

Not sure of forums, i don't frequent any DC++ forums, i just go to hubs with a shed load of users. it also helps if you have a hefty share i.e >250gig as you tend to get onto some of the better hubs.

cheers

big sinky

Aztec Performance Ltd

iTrader: (234)

What do you mean by multiple connections? I assume you dont mean multiple downloads, which can be done on DC++ anyway.

Bob

bigsinky

sorry multiple source downloading and partial file sharing

Aztec Performance Ltd

iTrader: (234)

like kazza? On my 576k broadband I can get a healthy 54k download rate from a single connection on DC++. Just that recently alot more connections seem to be slower. Can still get the 54k but not as readily.

700mb film takes around 3.5hrs.

Bob

Luminous

iTrader: (3)

I'm liking Revconnect. Running at 150 kb/s now . Thanks for the tips

bigsinky

yep my 3meg connection is maxed out @ 376kb per sec atm. so much ****, so little time

Aztec Performance Ltd

iTrader: (234)

Am trying it out now. Certainly easier than std DC++ as you have to keep an eye on it.

Bob

Aztec Performance Ltd

iTrader: (234)

Am liking it Maxes out bandwidth without having to keep an eye on it